r/infp

Do you have a tendency to get attached to people too quickly? Like way before you actually know them. So it’s really just your idealised version of them running wild in your imagination. Keep having this issue, and while I’m aware of it I don’t know how to fix it.

Do you have any tips on how to stay grounded in the moment and have more realistic expectations?

Say hi, if you’re looking for the same:)

So obviously, before I being, you can't graduate into another mbti type.

But the older I get, the more comfortable I am with Ne and Te working together. I need to socialize. I'm starting to love meeting new people.

I definitely need my alone time but socializing is taking a bigger role in my life the older I get. How about you?

This summer I want to sleep under Your Shadow The clear summer sky The silence of air I want to get towards you One last time

(24, F) am in a friendgroup with two other girls. One is Infj and one is Esfj. The Infj shares some of my interests, for example I can talk to her about movies and TV shows. The Esfj is not interested in any media (wild I know). She only listens to music veryyy casually in the car and she never watches any shows or movies. The online content she consumes is mostly mainstream female influencers. She also doesn‘t know anything about pop culture.

Both of these friends are kind of chronically offline (opposite of me). Usually when we meet up we talk about real life stuff like work, studying, family etc. I am fine talking about this stuff bc I want to know how everyone is doing etc. but honestly at some point it gets boring. With my other friends I usually talk about our favorite artists and stuff we‘ve seen recently a lot, concerts we went to etc. and it‘s very fun for me to talk about this stuff.

So when I‘m with this infj and esfj friend (we mostly meet up as trio but now and then also one on one). I sometimes (maybe after 2 or 3 hours of cacthing up) bring up something like a movie I‘ve seen recently and ask the infj if she‘s heard of it/ seen it. Then she might follow up with mentioning a show she has enjoyed recently. Now, I know the esfj friend doesn‘t enjoy media but still I think that she could particpate in this convo like ask why I liked it so much or what it is about etc. But every time I bring up a topic like that she immediately gets dead silent. In a way that makes it really obvipus that she‘s kind of annoyed or very disinterested. So the infj and me will stop talking about it after at most 10 minutes bc it’s uncomfortable. At this point this behaviour from esfj annoys me because no matter what she talks about I will ask questions and give my opinion and let her talk about it even when it‘s boring to me. I feel like she can talk to me about over 90% of the stuff she wants to talk about and I can only talk about like 20%. It comes off as self centred to me and the older I get the more fed up I am getting with stuff like that.

Does anyone else have this issue? I might sound dramatic but to me it‘s kind of a big deal and it kind of makes me dislike her.

I’m need to vent. I’m an INFP, if that test means anything. And I’m a 26 year old female.

I’ve been thinking about life for a very long time. I would consider myself an extremely philosophical thinker. Or just a thinker and observer. Not a talker.

Something is wrong. With society. With people. Everything’s been corrupted.

Everything started when I got an iPhone. At.. 13? I think. But there’s also movies. And books, even.

A flattering appearance is all that people care about. Clothes. Dressing up. Makeup. All these influencers. That’s all they care about. How they look. Anti-aging stuff everywhere.

I’m not saying that we should neglect our appearances. But that is the main thing that’s been important and is what the influencers are trying to ‘influence’ onto people. Why?

Everything is a distraction. I wonder how smart and happy humans would be without such distractions. Dont you think most of these distractions that have been made were put here on purpose by ‘evil higher up’s’ so we never make it to our human capabilities? What we are really meant for? I don’t what that is. But I know it’s not what society has made us today. All these distractions WILL consume us. The phones have consumed us. Video games have consumed us. Movies and shows have consumed us. AI will consume us soon enough. We think w have control over ourselves but we don’t. It doesn’t seem like we do. We always go back to those distractions, don’t we? I suppose there are healthy balances to everything. But I think all of our minds are going to get weaker. Short form content has consumed us.

We can’t focus anymore. Don’t you think that’s exactly how they want it? The evil higher ups? I don’t know who or what they are. But there’s something. Why are we all giving in to it? We are we like sheep? Or zombies? I like sheep. The animal. But we are zombies. Why do we just obey?

They are changing the whole world so one day it will be impossible to wake up without being a zombie for them. A servant.

I hate influencers. All these ‘day in the life’ videos. We aren’t meant to see everyone daily lives. We are so bored with our own lives that we have to record ourselves to make it seem like we are important to people and make it seem like our lives are entertaining.

We used to just go about our days without recording it. Children used to be able to live without a parent pointing a phone in their face while they play with a new toy or something. And don’t tell me, ‘Oh, what if they just want a record to look back on in the future?” Why don’t you just look with your own eyes and take a private picture or video and save it for yourself? Why don’t you just be present in that moment and remember it in your mind? Is yourself and your brain not good enough of a place to keep your precious memories? You have to post it to the world? You can’t have a photo album or a computer I suppose to store videos just for yourself? Oh right. You can make money off of it! Right. Money. Because money is more important than keeping your life private and safe and you are just another slave to the system that tells us money will make you happier. Don’t you feel disgusting that you are making money by posting your precious memories of your pure child? Don’t you know about the disgusting people that are watching your videos of your child?

I know money helps. It’s good to have a clean home. And money for necessities. Maybe education. Even education I am now weary about these days. The ‘evil higher up’s’ could be having their ways with the educational system and changing the actual education we know of. Putting lies in textbooks. I don’t know though. I will have to think about that one.

I’ll stop with this rant. But it makes me very angry. About how simple minded and how easily humans can be persuaded by evil for the fake happiness they push onto us.

Does anyone understand what I’m trying to say?

Everything feels wrong. It feels like a dystopian movie. I don’t want to believe any of it. It doesn’t feel real.

I want people, myself included, to stop being slaves to the evil ones. I want to know what is happening at the very top. I never will. At least I know something’s wrong and we are all believing lies everyday.

I need to keep my peace and I hope every one else understands what I’m trying to say. I do not want to become one of these crazy, conspiracy people. I’m not. I am logical. I just always have asked ‘Why?’ I’m turning more and more to Christianity because of all of this. There’s too much evil happening and I want everyone I know and love to be protected. If Christianity is even true. But it’s better than nothing.

An ENTJ and I have a crush on each other.

I'm looking for the experience of couples that lasted - at least - 6 months, please.

EDIT: How old are/were you?

(I'm used to see INFP+INTJ and ENTJ+ISFP.)

This might sound weird soo, I (19M) ENTJ met an online friend (19F) who’s INFP, in the beginning she would initiate conversations and stuff but now like after 3 weeks she started to only send reels/tiktoks every other day and Im the one who get to initiate everytime and she replies normally (not dry replies). My problem is its like she doesn’t care whether we play together unless im the one initiating and asking her even tho shes playing solo. Idk I feel like she wouldn’t care if I just block her or pull myself out. I hate being the one to always initiate. Ik this is kinda weird but the problem is kinda me, once i meet someone interesting i give them most of my attention and time and i think this ruins everything

I am more interested in intuitive types, so Infp, Enfp, Enfj, Infj. All of them are empathetic and care of other’s feelings. But what’s the difference in perceiving someone’s emotions?

I’m focusing on delving into some unconscious aspects of each individual type to learn more. If you’re INFP or any other type really feel free to message me or leave a comment and I can explain more

I’m wondering if this is a “me thing” or something more common for INFPs. Due to my childhood I have learned to be overly self reliant and it wears me out. Right now I am struggling with a potential career change and I just want someone else to figure out who I am, what job won’t kill me, and get me hired! 😂

and I keep wondering what I did wrong. I'm going to refer to her as Jane. Jane refers to herself as an Empath and has always talked about narcissists in our friendship. a lot of her ex friends including her own ex husband are narcissists .

She has said some strange things in the past that point towards paranoia. for example, she was convinced her friend was spying on her through a crystal ball and she also ghosted this friend. her ex friend sent her gifts and a letter saying how amazing she was but jane was not impressed.

jane also talked about how her other ex friend tried saying hi across the car park and Jane ignored her, feeling embarrassed for her.

she also judged her ex friend for smiling at a funeral, at her dad's funeral. (not jane's dad.. her own dad's funeral)

but I thought everyone grieves and acts differently during those times?

ANYWAYYY I sent this friend about three voice notes. I asked if she wanted to meet over Xmas. she said yeah but then she was sick and never actually told me which was also weird. then I suggested another time.

then I sent three unrelated voice notes about things going on and basically never heard from her again except one or two odd videos on tiktok. I don't know what to do. I thought maybe she got offended or something.

Sent her this morning: "You free sometime this week? We should go to [venue]. [followed by a relevant inside joke]"

She replied within minutes, asking if I was free on Saturday. I said I have work. She then corrected my inattentive ADHD brain — "Maybe not this week lol" — and sent a screenshot showing the venue is closed for most of this week. Then asked what days I was free next week. I said only Mon-Wed. She responded:

"Let's wait till the week after then" — (so likely 20th or 21st).

She did the logistical checks. She worked around two scheduling conflicts to keep the plan alive. That's not how disinterested responses look. "I'm busy" is one message. This was four.

The odds aren't 90% but they're well above a coin flip. We have a rough plan and a venue. I was paranoid the entire time — 130bpm sitting down over a Snapchat. Apple Watch called me out lol.

Agree I should have checked their website first. You could argue I could have switched to a different place, but this one aligns with the inside joke between us. And complicating it would paint the picture that I'm desperate.

My work schedule is busy - full-time employed and doing MBA, so scheduling this may be hard - but she remembers this.

CONTEXT (ORIGINAL POST)

She (21F, INFP) and I have known each other for 4 years. I've seen her romantically for about a year, and the signs have gradually become less and less platonically defensible.

A few weeks ago, after a group dinner, she was in my car outside her place and, unprompted, said — with a nervous chuckle, my parents aren't home, then slower and warmer: We can definitely meet up sometime.

I bond way more with INTPs because of the Ne-Si axis, and on the other hand, always felt very intimidated by ISTPs. But to my surprise, I’ve come to realize we share a lot of things in common. (The ones I met at least)

Although I still feel a distance because of my Se blindness, there’s still a space with them for authenticity, knowledge, introspection,… they’re cool dudes.

i keep trying to tell my siblings i prefer people who are more chaotic and exxp but mys siblings keep insisting golden pairs are golden pairs for a reason, especially since they both happen to like their golden pairs. like, idk, i never met these MBTI types irl, but my siblings are just frustrated with me for insisting i dont think id like them since i never met any, so they say i wouldnt know. meanwhile my only two best friends i got on well with in high school were both ENFP.

so pls just tellme your experiences and whther you think it works. are any of them golden retriever coded? i tend to prefer people like that. also, do they tell you what to do too much? and are they playful/spontaneous sometimes, i tend to find that attractive.

https://preview.redd.it/eyhx6yvhineg1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=c364114fb52e97db2baa77de93066d9c8a0b7635

Reader Map

• What does the Feeling Framework deal with
• Fi as internal valuation and continuity
• Fe as external emotional mapping / regulation
• How each fails when isolated
• Fi + Fe Combined
• Jungian grounding (Appendix)

Feeling Framework

What does the Feeling Framework deal with

Evaluative data.

This includes, but not limited to:
• Values
• Relational resonance
• Emotional significance
• Like / dislike
• Importance
• Moral weight
• Emotional meaning
• Worth
• Inner alignment / dissonance
• Preference

Feeling does not deal with:

• truth / falsity
• definitions
• explanations
• cause → effect chains
• systems
• raw sensory data
• logic
• possibilities by themselves

Those belong to other domains.

Fi (as lived)

• The continuity of the Internal Emotions
• Preserves personal value structures
• Coherence in Feelings and Emotions from the user perspective
• Evaluates internal worth of itself and other things
• Experiences emotions without the need to perceive them
• Detached from the external emotional regulation processes

Fe (as lived)

• Reads and perceives emotional environments
• Translates affect between people
• Empathises and understands emotions
• Detached from inner valuation
• Copies and Lives the feeling rather than let it flow through it
• Manages relational dynamics

Forget the mainstream definitions

We want you to forget all the definitions of Fi and Fe in the mainstream sources:

“Fi is personal values”
“Fi is subjective feeling”
“Fe is empathy”
“Fe is social harmony”

Not because these are wrong, Empathy is in fact a consequence of Fe, Sympathy is in fact a consequence of Fi. Fe does look for social harmony, and Fi does seek value and worth. However, these are all merely but shallow definitions of a whole complex entity defining a significant part of us.

And the truth is that we can only explain each cognitive function more and more —
and still you will only understand them when you grasp the real essence of each.

And as we mentioned before, this is again our ultimate goal:
To introduce you to each cognitive function as a living entity,
as a big portion of our cognition,
a whole universe found within us
that defines who we are.

Fi — The Silent Continuity of Worth

A river.
A current.
A living emotional field.

That’s what Introverted Feeling (Fi) is.

Imagine Fi like a deep underground river — unseen by the owner but continuous, and this flow reflects over the surface.

It’s nature is just to flow, just like the Ti tower of logic, one block after another, the flow doesn’t stop. Which can become overwhelming and intense.  

Fi is not expression.
Fi is not communication.
Fi is being affected.

Every emotional experience is absorbed internally and integrated into a living value-field.
Each emotion doesn’t stand alone — it joins the river.

The river remembers.
It carries emotional weight forward, this weight, value, worth, they’re all being carried in one direction.
It never resets.

Fi does not process emotions.
Fi holds them.

And because it holds them,
it does not need to explain them, or justify them, translate them, or regulate them. It’s just a river of emotions and feelings accumulating one over another. An Fi doesn’t understand why does it feel this way, it just knows it, it can’t instantly trace why it values this thing, or perceive something as right or wrong, it just knows it.

It simply knows what feels right, wrong, aligned, violated, meaningful, empty.

How Fi builds its inner continuity

Earlier we explained the Introverted vs Extraverted cognitive functions, and we explained how a cognitive function like Fi is a sphere black from the outside, mirrored from the inside. Alone by itself, without Se, Ne, or Te working in conjunction with it, it would just look empty from the outer perspective, a spectator would only see a black sphere. From the inside however, it gets as intense as it could, a mirrored sphere full of the relative framework information, uncontrollable spasms of feelings and emotions, reflecting and bouncing from one point to the other. The mirror reflects an image of the overall direction of this river.
Information enters this sphere from another function, causing a chain reaction and adding to the overall momentum and inertia. Emotions enter Fi like water joining a current.
Each experience subtly alters the flow —
not abruptly,
not analytically,
but permanently.

Values are not chosen.
They are formed.

Once formed, they are unnegotiable.

If something violates this inner continuity, it is rejected — not intellectually, but existentially. The Fi own share of stubbornness among the Introverted functions.

And just like Ti structures concepts into flawless coherence,
Fi structures worth into flawless emotional consistency, unaware of why, but confident with what it feels, with what it values and worth.

No contradictions are allowed.

Not as a rule —
but as a natural consequence of continuity.

This is what they mean by “Fi is subjective”

Subjective here does not mean arbitrary.
It means internally anchored.

Fi does not outsource valuation.
It does not ask:
“What should I feel?”
“What is appropriate?”
“What do others value?”

Those questions belong to Fe.

Fi asks only one thing:
“Does this align?”

And if it doesn’t, no amount of explanation, logic, or justification can override that.

Just like Ti rejects data that does not fit its structure,
Fi rejects emotional input that violates its inner inertia and momentum that the river flows by.

As you can probably speculate till now, same Ti internal mechanism is being seen here within the Fi, the difference is almost only with the type of data it deals with.

Fi and “mere emotional expression”

Fi does not express to process.
Expression is optional.

Emotions are already processed by virtue of being held without understanding the “Why”s, the Connections, the reasons and explanations

This is why Fi users often appear emotionally opaque,
reserved,
or unreachable.

Not because they lack emotion —
but because the emotion is already integrated.

And just like Ti questions data before abandoning a structure,
Fi questions external emotional pressure before abandoning a value, and this deserves a whole topic by itself, but we will get into that later.

Now here is the critical note

Fi cannot deconstruct emotions selectively.

If a core value is violated,
the entire emotional continuity destabilizes. There is no partial adjustment, and there is no control over the network.

Just like pulling a block from the bottom of a Ti tower collapses the structure,
violating a foundational value collapses Fi’s emotional reality, and this feels like you’re not in-tuned with your feelings, with your emotions and beliefs, with your worth and morality compass. This is so hard if you are able to imagine it or understand it, this is feeling lost at its purest forms, this is the textbook definition of losing yourself.

This is not “being upset.”
This is a collapse in the internal evaluative framework, your compass in everything that you perceive “Matters”.

Fe — The Architecture of Emotional Space

Fi is the river,
Fe is a canal system that somehow sets the direction, or at least is able to set the direction of this flow, that sees all the Fi information that passes through it, the Fe roots for the Fi.

Fe does not own emotions —
it moves them, or at least, the Fi flows in the Fe.

That doesn’t mean Fi doesn’t flow by itself within the user, Fi is a whole entity, the river itself, it flows no matter what, in the user’s cognition it flows by itself. But now we are talking about Fe, what is Fe, Fe is a place where Fi flows, Fe moves the Fi, it roots for it, it’s able to contain it.

And this definition by itself is beautiful on its own, it really grasps the dynamics between the Fe and Fi, how a strong Fe will contain all the chaos of the Fi, set a direction to it, literally hug the Fi, give it the comfort after all this chaos. Meanwhile, the Fi will fill the utter emptiness that Fe is, filling the river track with the flowing water nourishing all kind of life in it. Fe seeks Fi, it needs it, it looks for it. The Fi seeks nothing really, it doesn’t actively or consciously seek anything, it is all what “Seeking” is about, it’s everything that comes side-by-side with the action of seeking without the action itself, it’s the reason, the value, the worth, the compass, the emotion, the feeling, that the “seeking” as an action is all about, its the intense uncontrollable flow of all of these things by itself. A healthy, strong Fi user most of the time resembles the flow of this river. And a comforting beautiful flow is never complete without an Fe, with all its beautiful qualities, rooting and containing the Fi.

And Fe is smart, it reads emotional environments,
tracks emotional signals,
detects tension, harmony, escalation, withdrawal.

Fe is zoomed out.

Where Fi is dense, continuous, and internal,
Fe is spacious, adaptive, and relational.

It does not ask:
“What do I feel?”
“What do I value?”

It asks:
“What is the feeling here?”
“What is happening emotionally here?”
“What am I supposed to feel?”
“What should I value?”

And yes — all of these questions are cruelly relevant to Fe.

The question “What am I supposed to feel?” does not come from an internal feeling source.
It emerges from observation.

Fe observes what is happening emotionally here — in the atmosphere, the people, the scene, the relationship, the moment — and from this observation it derives what is appropriate, expected, or required emotionally.

Fi will never ask “What am I supposed to feel?”
It simply feels.
It does not consult the outside world.
It does not reference context, rules, expectations, or emotional atmosphere.
It does not allow external conditions to dictate its internal evaluation.

Fe does.

Fe, by itself, stripped from everything else, does not generate feeling directly.

It does not produce feeling from within, the way Fi does.

Instead, Fe empathizes.
It empathizes with:

• people
• scenes
• memories
• emotional atmospheres
• other people’s feelings
• relational dynamics

And this is where its ability to feel stems from.

Fe feels through something.
It feels with something.
It feels in response to something.

But on its own, Fe does not simply generate feeling.
It does not feel in the Fi sense of feeling.

That is why “What do I feel?” is a nonsensical question for Fe by itself.

The same applies to value.

Fe does not really see value.
It does not internally define value.
It does not originate value.

Instead, it copies value —
from the collective,
from the environment,
from what everyone sees as valuable.

This is the inauthentic side of Fe.

And this is not an insult — it is a structural truth.

Fe adopts value because value already exists out there.
It aligns with what is rewarded, expected, respected, or condemned.
It mirrors collective valuation rather than forming its own.

Again — Fe alone, as an individual function.

Fe doesn’t see value — it sees connection. It doesn’t see the value of someone — it sees a relationship. It doesn’t see worth — it sees interaction. It doesn’t see intrinsic meaning — it sees emotional linkage. It sees friendship, love, a feeling, attachment and relational meaning — all of which stem from connection, not from internally generated value.

On its own, Fe does not even possess the sense of “my own value,” “self-worth,” “self-importance,” or “love yourself.” These are Fi concepts, that Fe isn’t able to comprehend.

We stress the phrases “on its own,” “stripped from everything,” and “by itself” deliberately. This description does not apply to Fe users — it applies to Fe itself. Cognition never operates in isolation, and no function works alone in a real person.

This is why you will notice many of the characteristics described above appearing in high Fe users, but not in a pure form. A high Fe user will almost always also have a relatively strong Fi, and therefore you will observe strong Fi activity alongside Fe.

On the other hand, you will often observe weak Fi activity in low Fe users. And the terms High–Low and Strong–Weak are used on purpose, not interchangeably.

A low Fe user may still exhibit strong Fe activity due to cognitive development. Atmospheric and conditional circumstances, steming from environment, upbringing, conditioning, trauma, adaptation, or social necessity — and this is what referred to as Nurture. However, when Fe activity develops strongly in a low Fe user due to the cognitive development, signs of troubled cognitive dynamics may appear. And this might translate to troubled mindset, anxiety, or other forms of a troubled cognition.

The problem isn’t intense in a pessimistic way,
And the problem is not the user,
Nor the problem is Fe itself.
The problem might stem just simply because Fe is operating largely stripped away from Fi.

And the same principle applies in reverse.

A low Fi user may develop strong Fi activity, but when this happens and automatically there is no sufficient Fe activity, it might lead to some level of troubled dynamics. In both cases, the issue is identical: a function operating mostly in isolation, without its natural counterbalance.

 

Fe as the manager of the Feeling domain

Imagine a room full of high Fi users.

Each one is experiencing a rich, continuous inner emotional reality —
but none of them is speaking the same language.

Emotions are present,
but unregulated.

Only a strong Fe can:
• translate emotional states
• regulate escalation
• balance expression
• stabilize relational space
• create emotional coherence between individuals

Fe is not emotion.
Fe is emotional logistics.

Just like Te manages thinking externally,
Fe manages feeling externally.

Again, similar Mechanics, different Domains. Similar working Mechanism, different set of Data.

The emptiness of Fe — and its strength

Fe is empty inside.

And this emptiness is painful.

But it is also what allows Fe to absorb everything outside:
• moods
• tensions
• desires
• expectations
• emotional undercurrents

Fe does not judge worth.
It organizes affect.

Now the crucial fact: “Mere emotion”

1 — Raw emotion without valuation

Fi experiences emotion without regulating it.
Fe regulates emotion without owning it.

2 — Why Fi can become emotionally rigid

Because inner continuity feels like truth.
What aligns feels right.
What violates feels wrong.

And just like Ti stubbornness,
Fi stubbornness arises from flawless internal coherence.

3 — Why Fe can become emotionally hollow

Because regulation without valuation leads to emotional conformity without meaning.

4 — Each can fail in its own way

Fi alone risks emotional isolation and collapse.
Fe alone risks emotional emptiness and performativity.

When the feeling process diverges

When multiple values conflict,
Fi cannot hold both.

It will retreat,
withdraw,
and suffer internally
until one path survives.

Fe, in contrast, can hold multiple emotional realities simultaneously —
but may lose all sense of what matters.

And this is a beautiful learning path along the journey of the Fe user, to have a sense of What really matters?

Collapse: violation of the inner value

When a foundational value is violated,
Fi collapses.

Not loudly.
Not visibly.

Internally.

Just like Ti losing its structure,
Fi loses its emotional reality.

And similar confusion and collapse due to lack of mapping is seen in Ti.

The ultimate combination: Fi + Fe

The healthiest Feeling framework is Fi and Fe combined —
feeding into each other, correcting each other.

Fi gives meaning.
Fe gives translation.

Fi gives depth.
Fe gives connection.

Fi prevents emptiness.
Fe prevents isolation.

Fi overwhelmed
Fe contains

Fi feels lost
Fe gives direction

And,

Fe feels empty
Fi provides...Well, itself!

 

Sympathy vs Empathy

Sympathy; the act of feeling for someone. And the act of feeling for, is a direct action, you feel for, thus the feeling stems from within you. When you sympathise with someone, you feel sad when they’re sad, you’ll be concerned when they’re acting weird…etc. without the need of digging further. Put an Fi in a room of negativity, it will be tainted with negativity, without understanding “Why this negativity?” and without analysing. That’s why mostly Fi users just leave the room in this case, rather than trying to dig deeper, or get things fixed… etc.

An Fi function will just feel sad when seeing a crying child for example. Or will feel sorrow just for seeing someone in a helpless mood.

Empathy; the act of feeling with someone. And the act of feeling with, isn’t an individual act, meaning it doesn’t just feel, it understands then relates then feels. When you empathise with someone, you understand them, you consume their emotions, you share them, and you put yourself in their shoes, then you feel them. Put an Fe in a room of negativity, and it will consume this negativity, often seeking the urge of correcting it, fixing it, and dig for the reasons to try to get things along. Why? We believe that this is due to the fact that an Fe itself is empty. If an Fe left that room after consuming this negativity, it will carry this negativity with it along the way, it will stay troubled until it consumes something else. When it consumes something else it can easily replace the negative with positive, the bad with good. Unlike the Fi, which if stayed in that room, it will only exhaust itself, tainting with all the negativity, this taint will be for a long term, and the Fi doesn’t have the ability to systematically organise, manage, and knockoff this negative energy. It’s just simply much easier for Fi to leave before staying too much, and easier for Fe to solve it right there before leaving. Each one of the two have their own hardships, difficulties, and challenges.

Note: Many day-to-day life dynamics are reflected from these cognitive functions; however, this is not a typology class. Of course these dynamics is used in typology, but as a whole, after the whole idea is consumed. The problem in real life typology is not the theory, or this example let’s say; its rather the judgment of the typing person on their object. So while the Sympathy and Empathy are really reflected from Fi and Fe, the challenge comes in accurately judging if a person actually mostly uses Sympathy or Empathy. This is a common mistake when it comes to any subject, mistaking the accuracy of the theory with how well it is really applied.

Scope note

This model describes cognitive tendencies — not caring, competence, or personal worth.

Final synthesis

• Fi alone preserves flawless inner values and risks emotional isolation.
• Fe alone manages emotion and risks meaninglessness.
• Together, Fi and Fe produce emotional truth and relational coherence.

Continuity without translation isolates.
Translation without continuity empties.

+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Appendix — Introverted Feeling (Fi): Some of the Jungian Writings

Carl Gustav Jung — Psychological Types
Collected Works, Volume 6 (CW6), R.F.C. Hull translation

Referenced themes include:
• Orientation by the subjective factor
• Hidden depth of feeling
• Difficulty of expression
• Inner value absoluteness
• One-sidedness and withdrawal

“Introverted feeling is determined principally by the subjective factor.”

“It is deep, but not extensive.”

“Its values are absolute.”

“It is silent and hard to access.”

Appendix — Extraverted Feeling (Fe): Some of the Jungian Writings

Collected Works, Volume 6 (CW6)

Referenced themes include:
• Orientation by the objective factor
• Regulation of emotional values
• Adaptation to collective norms
• Suppression of inner valuation
• Emotional conformity

“Extraverted feeling is oriented by objective values.”

“It adjusts itself to the emotional expectations of the environment.”

“Its danger lies in loss of inner value.”

“Feeling becomes a function of adaptation.”

I had been best friends with him for 3 years, we've known each other for 5 years, 2 years as a friend, we've met on first year of college and we become close friends after I switched my section to his classes, we got to know better, I used to flirt with him as a joke and had thought of kissing him , I knew he was homophobic and hated it so I stopped but also he had a girlfriend he loved dearly and waiting to get married, they are still dating btw ,so he talked about her all the time, like any chance he gets, he expressed how much he love her and care about her so I realised at that moment, I shouldn't be evil and selfish and to stop inappropriate thoughts about him. I've told him about my past and experiences with girls before, but as time goes by I have changed a lot about myself and become closer to God , I wanted a real thing like he have , beautiful relationship and someone I want to love , he truly helped me like have been a good influence and made a good impact on me so on Saturday we were going to take our graduation photo and he was talking about, relationship and mentioned about sex and how to satisfy a women, he asked me from my experience I told him and also mentioned that the G-spot is the important thing, he searched it on Google and was looking at it on pics ,I told him the weird thing is also men have G-spot ,he was shocked and says where? I didn't reply but he thought for a second and said in our a*s 🍑, I replied yea , I saw someone talking about it online and told him that's how I knew, so we got talking, he wanted to know about the very first time I did it ,and it was 3 some ,me and my guy best friend at that time and her ,he asked if I kissed him ,I told him yes, I did that , and me and him used to practice how to kiss on each other, he felt a little uncomfortable on that information, after that he left to meet his girlfriend, it was lunchtime, after we took our photos, the photographer suggested we should pick 3 to put in the album so I picked mine and saw his picture, he seems good looking and neat on picture, I complimented him and say didn't realise you were this handsome, he became nonchalant about it but later that night suggested I should repented for my sins ,which I did and he feared I might make a move on him ,I told him I wouldn't and I would distant if the temptation comes ,and today as we were talking, he said I'm flirting with him ,I wasn't I was making jokes like I used to so now I understand this new information about me freaked him out and wanted to adjust, but I hope he realised it happened in the past and I'm currently in completely different place from where I was before.