u/Original_Engine6810

What do you think about this?

​

Hey everyone,

I'm exhausted and don't know where to explode anymore. Long story short, I struggle with ADHD, depression, and OCD. After years of suffering, I finally gathered the courage to see a psychiatrist. My dad came with me, and it went horribly wrong.

The psychiatrist barely listened to me and immediately sided with my dad. My dad, as always, called me "cowardly, timid, not participating in life." The doctor didn't challenge him at all. Instead, he just nodded along and repeated the same boomer crap: "Just get a job, earn money, get out there." As if I'm not doing these things because I simply don't want to. He even took a dig at me, saying "You can't just lie in bed popping pills, you have to force yourself to do things." That was their solution.

Is there a name for this? For a psychiatrist invalidating his patient like this, reducing everything to "just get a job" right in front of the parent who constantly belittles him?

I somehow managed to convince him to prescribe me something. He wrote Fulsac (fluoxetine, basically Prozac). He said it was "for motivation," but even then he mocked it: "It probably won't work, maybe it'll fix you just a tiny bit at most." Meanwhile, my suicidal thoughts are intense. Part of me thinks maybe only then my dad would finally snap out of his "I'm always right" mode. But I'll still try the damn pills.

My question: Is Fulsac (fluoxetine) actually good for ADHD, depression, and OCD? Is it really just a "tiny fix," or does it have the potential to genuinely help? (And please don't defend this psychiatrist. He is the rotten system itself.)

I feel completely alone and hopeless. Has anyone else been through this? What should I do?

Also, small addition: Do these meds actually not work, like he implied? Is it true that they're useless?

​

Hey everyone,

I'm exhausted and don't know where to explode anymore. Long story short, I struggle with ADHD, depression, and OCD. After years of suffering, I finally gathered the courage to see a psychiatrist. My dad came with me, and it went horribly wrong.

The psychiatrist barely listened to me and immediately sided with my dad. My dad, as always, called me "cowardly, timid, not participating in life." The doctor didn't challenge him at all. Instead, he just nodded along and repeated the same boomer crap: "Just get a job, earn money, get out there." As if I'm not doing these things because I simply don't want to. He even took a dig at me, saying "You can't just lie in bed popping pills, you have to force yourself to do things." That was their solution.

Is there a name for this? For a psychiatrist invalidating his patient like this, reducing everything to "just get a job" right in front of the parent who constantly belittles him?

I somehow managed to convince him to prescribe me something. He wrote Fulsac (fluoxetine, basically Prozac). He said it was "for motivation," but even then he mocked it: "It probably won't work, maybe it'll fix you just a tiny bit at most." Meanwhile, my suicidal thoughts are intense. Part of me thinks maybe only then my dad would finally snap out of his "I'm always right" mode. But I'll still try the damn pills.

My question: Is Fulsac (fluoxetine) actually good for ADHD, depression, and OCD? Is it really just a "tiny fix," or does it have the potential to genuinely help? (And please don't defend this psychiatrist. He is the rotten system itself.)

I feel completely alone and hopeless. Has anyone else been through this? What should I do?

Also, small addition: Do these meds actually not work, like he implied? Is it true that they're useless?

These countries often continue to use socialist symbols, rhetoric, and revolutionary imagery, yet many critics argue that, in practice, they have moved far away from socialism itself. In my view, some of these states can still be seen as geopolitical forces opposing American dominance, which is why certain groups continue to support them. However, this raises an important question: was their shift away from socialism an unavoidable historical necessity, or did later leaders gradually steer these countries toward capitalism, ultimately betraying the original revolution after the deaths of the founding figures?

This debate appears frequently when discussing countries that preserved the language and symbolism of socialism while adopting market-oriented economic systems, centralized state capitalism, or nationalist policies. Some people argue that these changes were forced by economic isolation, global pressure, sanctions, technological competition, and the need to survive in a capitalist world order. Others believe that a bureaucratic ruling class slowly emerged inside these revolutions and transformed the system from within, prioritizing stability, state power, and self-preservation over socialist ideals.

More broadly, many revolutionary states seem to experience a similar pattern over time: revolutionary energy weakens, institutions become more rigid, leadership turns increasingly centralized, and economic survival begins to outweigh ideological goals. As a result, socialism may remain more as a symbolic identity, historical legitimacy, or nationalist narrative rather than as a genuinely transformative economic and social system.

What do you think explains this pattern most convincingly: external pressure and historical necessity, internal corruption and bureaucratic degeneration, or something deeper within the structure of revolutionary states themselves?

These countries often continue to use socialist symbols, rhetoric, and revolutionary imagery, yet many critics argue that, in practice, they have moved far away from socialism itself. In my view, some of these states can still be seen as geopolitical forces opposing American dominance, which is why certain groups continue to support them. However, this raises an important question: was their shift away from socialism an unavoidable historical necessity, or did later leaders gradually steer these countries toward capitalism, ultimately betraying the original revolution after the deaths of the founding figures?

This debate appears frequently when discussing countries that preserved the language and symbolism of socialism while adopting market-oriented economic systems, centralized state capitalism, or nationalist policies. Some people argue that these changes were forced by economic isolation, global pressure, sanctions, technological competition, and the need to survive in a capitalist world order. Others believe that a bureaucratic ruling class slowly emerged inside these revolutions and transformed the system from within, prioritizing stability, state power, and self-preservation over socialist ideals.

More broadly, many revolutionary states seem to experience a similar pattern over time: revolutionary energy weakens, institutions become more rigid, leadership turns increasingly centralized, and economic survival begins to outweigh ideological goals. As a result, socialism may remain more as a symbolic identity, historical legitimacy, or nationalist narrative rather than as a genuinely transformative economic and social system.

What do you think explains this pattern most convincingly: external pressure and historical necessity, internal corruption and bureaucratic degeneration, or something deeper within the structure of revolutionary states themselves?

What are your general thoughts on this event? Doesn't the concept of "umma" (Islamic community) practically work?

I can't work because of my depression and problems. I couldn't get psychiatric help because of my mother. I had a very hard time convincing my father. As I slowly get better and become financially independent, I beat my brother I want to run away from home, I'm fed up. I'm weak, stupid, unemployed, and I've been insulted and humiliated for not going to school. I've been kicked out of the house so many times, and they acted like nothing happened, as if the problem was with me They used my basic needs as a weapon against me. My father and mother physically harmed me. My younger brother would always get angry and try to hit me, push me, for no reason. When I responded, my family blamed me, saying I should have backed down, but when I got tired of staying silent and started shouting and getting angry, all they did was threaten me and blame me. I was the whole problem Now I constantly pretend to be crazy, acting like a baby, both to disgust myself and to isolate myself. I'll use my father financially at home before I leave. Is there anyone else who feels the same way as me?

I can't work because of my depression and problems. I couldn't get psychiatric help because of my mother. I had a very hard time convincing my father. As I slowly get better and become financially independent, I beat my brother I want to run away from home, I'm fed up. I'm weak, stupid, unemployed, and I've been insulted and humiliated for not going to school. I've been kicked out of the house so many times, and they acted like nothing happened, as if the problem was with me They used my basic needs as a weapon against me. My father and mother physically harmed me. My younger brother would always get angry and try to hit me, push me, for no reason. When I responded, my family blamed me, saying I should have backed down, but when I got tired of staying silent and started shouting and getting angry, all they did was threaten me and blame me. I was the whole problem Now I constantly pretend to be crazy, acting like a baby, both to disgust myself and to isolate myself. I'll use my father financially at home before I leave.

Is there anyone else who feels the same way as me?

The party is full of billionaires, workers are exploited, small businesses have little oversight, unions are subservient to the state rather than the workers, and generally, workers have no power against those in power.

What are your thoughts on this? For example, are even openly racist and fascist ideas considered freedom of expression? If not, and if punishment is necessary, as in reactionary countries and regimes, where fascism and racism are used as a stigma and accusation, then those who are socialists themselves are punished simply for thinking differently If this stigmatization is used for elimination, it sounds a bit dystopian and extreme, but you get the idea.

Bu konuda ne düşünüyorsunuz? Örneğin, açıkça ırkçı ve faşist fikirler bile ifade özgürlüğü olarak kabul ediliyor mu? Eğer değilse ve gerici ülkeler ve rejimlerde olduğu gibi cezalandırma gerekiyorsa ve bu damgalanma olarak kullanırsa sosyalist insanlar için bile

What are your thoughts on this? For example, are even openly racist and fascist ideas considered freedom of expression? If not, and if punishment is necessary, as in reactionary countries and regimes, where fascism and racism are used as a stigma and accusation, then those who are socialists themselves are punished simply for thinking differently If this stigmatization is used for elimination, it sounds a bit dystopian and extreme, but you get the idea.

Demokrasi ideoloji değil durumsa halka rağmen halk için hareket etmek doğru mudur

Sosyalistler bayrak mi indirmiş

/RDTTR Kapalı, ne yapmalıyız? Tek güvenli yerimiz orasıydı. İkinci Depogram vakası olduk.

/RDTTR It's closed, what should we do? That was our only safe place. We've become the second Depogram case.