r/RepTimeQC

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Andiot

2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Gmt Master 2 Bruce Wayne v3

4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $490

5. ⁠⁠Album link: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/231845285?uid=1

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment:Everything looks good but the date wheel looks slight vertically high.

7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Clear and clean

8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks a bit high

9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Good

10. ⁠⁠Bezel: 12 Oclock traingle looks off.

11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): it's fine I think.

12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: looks good

13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Plastic looks beat up I fear that this one has been RL’ed allot idk. I wasn’t supposed to have this one. They sent it anyways.. please check!!

Hi everyone! Total newbie here. This is my first rep, and I’m looking for some expert eyes to help me out. I’ve tried to compare it to Gen (authentic) photos, but I’m still training my eyes. Any help is greatly appreciated!

Dealer name: ETHAN WATCHES

Factory name : VSF

Model name: GMT-Master II 126710BLNR "Batgirl" on Jubilee

Price Paid: $580

Album Links: X

Index alignment: Looks okay to my untrained eye. Does the 6 o'clock marker look centered with the crown logo to you?

Dial Printing: Seems crisp. No obvious bleeding or crooked text but it is very very important for me and I think it’s good but again I am a noob

Date Wheel alignment/printing: The "11" looks well-centered. The cyclops magnification looks okay to me

Hand Alignment: Seems fine, the GMT hand (blue) looks correctly synced.

Bezel: The transitions at 6 and 18 (where blue meets black) look smooth.

Solid End Links (SELs): Looks like a tight fit with no visible gaps.

numbers: +4 s/d, 288° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error. (Numbers seem healthy based on what I've read).

the serial number on the rehaut is 6X0SG350.

Hi all, posting on behalf of something without the required Karma.

Dealer name: Ficotime

• Factory name: VSF

• Model name: GMT-Master II 126710GRNR "Bruce Wayne" (Jubilee Bracelet)

• Price Paid: $600 USD

• Index alignment: Everything looks well-aligned. The 12 o'clock triangle and 6 o'clock baton are centered.

• Dial Printing: Crisp and clean. The "GMT-MASTER II" green text pops nicely against the black dial. No visible bleed.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates are well-centered in the window. Cyclops magnification and anti-reflective coating look correct for VSF.

• Hand Alignment: Good. The GMT hand is properly synced with the hour hand.

• Bezel: Grey/Black transition is clean. Ceramic inserts are well-finished.

• Solid End Links (SELs): Tight fit. No visible gaps between the lugs and the bracelet.

• Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +8s/d; Amplitude: 242°; Beat Error: 0.1ms.

Hello, asking for assistance QC’ing my first rep purchase. Rolex Daytona 116500LN BTF. Would love to know more about what to look for rather than just a thumbs up or down, as I need to build upon my knowledge base, apply what I’m learning to future purchases and to be able to pay it forward by contributing to the community. This community has been great and has encouraged me to do a lot of research on my own while guiding me along the way. Any advice or insight would be greatly appreciated.

1. Andiot

2. ⁠BTF

3. ⁠Rolex Daytona 116500LN

4. ⁠$550

5. ⁠ https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/233694133?uid=1

6. ⁠Index alignment: centered, straight and appears to be properly spaced

7. ⁠Dial Printing: Font looks clean and sharp

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Nothing appears to be crooked

10. ⁠Bezel: Appears as if tachymeter triangle at 12 lines up with dial

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok I guess

12. ⁠Video loaded

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: N/A

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner Date 126610LN

4. ⁠Price Paid: $368 (incl shipping)

5. ⁠Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/233690498?uid=1

6: Index alignment: looks relatively ok given slight pic rotation (no matter how much I tried to correct it), top index slight clockwise rotation along with the 9 o clock.

7: Dial printing: on par with the other GLs I’ve seen

8: Date Wheel alignment/printing: I think it’s ok just seems to the left because of camera location.

9: Hand alignment: looks good ?

10: Bezel: seems ok

11: SEL: look good

12: Timegrapher numbers: in the acceptable range per the guide: kindly suggest me is it ok ?

1. ⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: WatchSeed

2. ⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner Starbucks 126610

4. ⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $490

5. ⁠⁠⁠Album Links: N/A

6. ⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: need expert thoughts

7. ⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks good to me

8. ⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks fine to me

9. ⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good

10. ⁠⁠⁠Bezel: Looks off by a click but after asking about it they sent me a picture with the bezel clicked back to align perfectly (first pic)

11. ⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good

12. ⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Rate: +/- 0s/d.

13. ⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Any input would be helpful thanks.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): Overseas 4500V 41mm SS/SS Blue ZF A9015

4. Price paid: $618 with shipping

5. Index alignment: Used the alignment tool. The 6 o'clock index appears shifted slightly to the right. There is also a slight radial misalignment on the 7 o'clock to 1 o'clock axis relative to the chapter ring (roughly 0.5 degree rotation).

6. Dial printing: The Maltese Cross at 12 o'clock has a microscopic clockwise (CW) rotation and is offset slightly to the right of the vertical center-line between the 12 o'clock indices. Sunburst effect and "Vacheron Constantin" text look crisp.

7. Date wheel alignment/printing: Date (13) is sitting slightly high in the window, which seems to be a common trait for the ZF/Miyota 9015 configuration.

8. Hand alignment: Looks perfect.

9. Bezel: The Maltese Cross-inspired bezel notches are symmetrical and well-finished.

10. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (Integrated bracelet), but the "Quick-Switch" integration at the lugs looks tight with no visible gaps.

11. Timegrapher numbers: +2s/d rate, 297° amplitude, 0.0ms beat error.

12. Anything else you notice: please suggest

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot

2. ⁠Factory name: ARF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): BRUCE WAYNE JUBILEE

4. ⁠Price Paid: $520/- (incl shipping)

5. ⁠Album links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/233690498?uid=1

6: Index alignment: looks Ok.

7: Dial printing: on par with the other GLs I’ve seen

8: Date Wheel alignment/printing: I think it’s ok just seems to the left because of camera location.

9: Hand alignment: looks good ?

10: Bezel: seems ok

11: SEL: look good

12: Timegrapher numbers: in the acceptable range per the guide: kindly suggest me is it ok ?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Andiot
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Milgauss 116400 GV VSF 1:1 Best Edition 904L Steel Blue Dial on SS Bracelet VS3131
4. ⁠Price Paid: $395 (Plus Shipping)
5. ⁠Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/233725352?uid=1
6. ⁠Index alignment: 3 marker look a little tilted off upward
7. ⁠Dial Printing: I don’t see any issues
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: Look fine
10. ⁠Bezel: My bezel look fine
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): no issues to me
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:+2s/d 280° 0.1ms 28800
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: n/a

It look like a GL to me, but any additional eyes and input would be greatly appreciated!!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Jtime

2. ⁠Factory name: XF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Overseas Ultra-Thin 2000V

4. ⁠Price Paid: $418

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/eAQjwTTR#4aLTMUfOBl1lhwmjpWUr7A

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks good but finishing on indexes (chamfering) does not look like gen

7. ⁠Dial Printing: lettering is good. Numbers around the indexes look dim but that may be the lighting

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good

10. ⁠Bezel: corners look pretty rounded

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok, but tough to evaluate

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: outstanding

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: I have not been able to find a gen version of this watch with a dial finish that even looks similar. Even old qc posts of this model seem to have a grey cast and a textured radial pattern. The dial of my watch looks very uniform and gloss, almost like lacquer. The cross appliqué on the dial is also solid, unlike gen which as far as I can tell is a hollow cross.

I would appreciate any insight from those more experienced since the Timegrapher numbers look amazing and I don’t want to RL. I know it is a rep, but I was between the brown overseas 4500V and this watch, and I’m starting to feel like maybe I made the wrong choice if the ultra-thin deviates so much from gen.

Thank you so much to anyone who takes a look and gives some input!

1. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: LiLi
2. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
3. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36 mm
4. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $410
5. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Album Links: https://shop02682640.wecatalog.cn/t/a4KMDgH
6. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: need expert thoughts
7. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: everything seems to be good
8. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
9. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good
11. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, but could be better
12. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: -3 s/d
13. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: Any input would be helpful and really appreciate .

Hello guys,

Since i RL my first example here i am again hoping for your clear vision and honest opinion. Thanks in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer name: NecoClock

2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster 300 Diver Black

4. ⁠Price Paid: 358$

5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/y4w3gSCD#kVP_CFnSjMaQ0l3mEOXBXQ

6. ⁠Index alignment: looks better than the first qc… 3 is a bit cw tilted

7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine for me

8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good to me

9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks to be good for me

10. ⁠Bezel: looks fine, pip centered

11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): is ok… bottom right maybe litte bigger but all good for me

12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, amp 293 and err 0,1 …. Think thats fine.

13. ⁠Anything else you notice: The tilted 3 is only thing not ok but i thinks not so dramatic and think about GL

Please help me with your wise experience! Have i overlooked something?Thanks in advance!

1. Dealer name: Repwatchking
2. Factory name: VS
3. Model name (& version number): Oyster Perpetual 41mm 3230 VSF
4. Price Paid: $577 + shipping
5. Album Links: X
6. Index alignment: Index alight looks pretty good.
7. Dial Printing: Seems like the spaces are slightly to big and not enough between P and E
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing:
9. Hand Alignment: Hand alignment looks pretty good
10. Bezel: Has a bezel but no alignment needed
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No issues
12. Timegrapher numbers: + 3 sec per day
13. Anything else you notice: None besides the dial printing

Afternoon everyone, this is my first post in this community. Watch looks pretty good except the dial printing. I'm pretty new to this so I'm looking for feedback also as I could be completely wrong.

ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 124060 (no date) 

1. Dealer name: JTime

2. Factory name: VSF

3. Model name: 124060

4. Price paid: 511 USD

5. Album links: https://imgur. com/a/E5hXu9J

6. Index alignment: they are slightly off in my opinion. Especially the 1,2 o'clock markers. Also the 12 o'clock triangle is slightly on the left so therefore it not points to the center of the Rolex crown logo.

7. Dial Printing: I'm nut sure, it not that crisp and the last two lines (superlative...) seems a little wobbly, but I'm really looking for your advice and opinion on this.

8. Date wheel alignement/printing: N/A

9. Hand alignment: looks ok to me but open for your advice

10. Bezel: markers are slightly off and the triangle with the lume pip is not in centered imho. What do you think?

11. Solid end links (SEL): the lower left seems suspicious but input would be greatly appreciated

12. Timegrapher numbers: BEAT 28800, AMP 277, 0 s/d, B.E. 0.0ms

Hi,

I would appreciate feedback on this one:

1. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dealer name: Fico
2. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Factory name: ZF
3. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Tudor BB58
4. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $329
5. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Album Links: QC album here https://mega.nz/folder/u0ZFBLLC#AbBTuXGvw8BNiFqyYWywfw
6. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: OK
7. Date Wheel alignment: N/A
8. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: OK
9. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: OK
10. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Bezel: Matches other reps I've seen
11. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok to me
12. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: Picture attached (+2s 279* 0.0ms 52* 28800)
13. ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Anything else you notice: No major concerns from my untrained eye.

Appreciate the input!

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Aqua Terra Black 38mm VS8800
4. Price Paid: 378$
5. Album Links: Here
6. Index alignment: Seems okay
7. Dial Printing: The logo seems slightly off, but I think it’s very hard to tell just by eye.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Date looks centered but seems little deep. Printing is okay I think but I'm not sure how the others
9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay
10. Bezel: Okay
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No SEL I think
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 288°, 0.0 ms, 52.0°, 28800
13. Anything else you notice: The logo on the clasp looks a little strange

1. Dealer name: FicoTime
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor BB54
4. Price Paid: $320 USD, including shipping and insurance
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/r1ZAAJBJ#VPnjoTzwQujQf3J0KgMUVw
6. Index alignment: It may just be the angle, but the triangle at 12 seems slightly off when lined up with the shield and the 6 marker. The 3 marker also appears a bit lower than the 9.
7. Dial Printing: OK
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good
10. Bezel: Lume pip align, all good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good overall, with slight gaps on the top left and bottom right. Not as tight as a VSF Sub, but still acceptable for this model ?
12. Timegrapher numbers: –2 s/d, amplitude 295, beat error 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Timegrapher numbers look strong. It also appears the lume mismatch issue has been corrected, which is great. Bracelet looks ok?

Hello everyone, ZF Tudor rep, so any feedback is appreciated. Mainly looking to confirm it’s good for a GL, especially the index alignment. Nothing looks seriously off or wonky to my untrained eye, but I’d appreciate a more experienced opinion.

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: Clean
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex

OP celebration 36mm

4. Price Paid: $558 shipped by FedEx-Deposit made, pending full payment after QC.

5. Index alignment: looks good

6. Dial Printing: looks fine. The blue could be a bit light?

7. Hand Alignment: fine

8. Bezel: Looks good

9. Solid End Links (SELs): no issues

10. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d, 266°,

0.1m/s

11. Anything else you notice: does the gap between links seem a little wide or is that just me?

Sorry I don’t know how to post videos

Hello, first time buyer, requesting feedback and guidance on my findings below. Look forward to hearing from you!

Model: Rolex GMT Bruce Wayne

Dealer: Geektime

Factory: VSF V3

Price: $700

Album: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/233475620?uid=1

Index alignment:markers look centered, lines look straight.

Dial printing: looks clear

Date wheel: lookd Good it’s centered, font looks correct

Hand alignment: looks good to me comparable to other vsf gmt models on here

Bezel: the grey and black bezel looks good

SELs: looks good I don’t see any major gaps.

Timegrapher: not sure tbh