Login

u/No_Focus_3668

Image 1 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 2 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 3 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 4 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 5 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 6 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 7 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 8 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 9 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 10 — ZF Tudor BB54
Image 11 — ZF Tudor BB54
▲ 7 r/RepTimeQC

ZF Tudor BB54

  1. Dealer name: FicoTime
  2. Factory name: ZF
  3. Model name (& version number): Tudor BB54
  4. Price Paid: $320 USD, including shipping and insurance
  5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/r1ZAAJBJ#VPnjoTzwQujQf3J0KgMUVw
  6. Index alignment: It may just be the angle, but the triangle at 12 seems slightly off when lined up with the shield and the 6 marker. The 3 marker also appears a bit lower than the 9.
  7. Dial Printing: OK
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Good
  10. Bezel: Lume pip align, all good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good overall, with slight gaps on the top left and bottom right. Not as tight as a VSF Sub, but still acceptable for this model ?
  12. Timegrapher numbers: –2 s/d, amplitude 295, beat error 0.1ms
  13. Anything else you notice: Timegrapher numbers look strong. It also appears the lume mismatch issue has been corrected, which is great. Bracelet looks ok?

Hello everyone, ZF Tudor rep, so any feedback is appreciated. Mainly looking to confirm it’s good for a GL, especially the index alignment. Nothing looks seriously off or wonky to my untrained eye, but I’d appreciate a more experienced opinion.

u/No_Focus_3668 — 18 hours ago
▲ 5 r/RepTimeQC

ZF Tudor BB54 from FicoTime

  1. Dealer name: FicoTime
  2. Factory name: ZF
  3. Model name (& version number): Tudor BB54
  4. Price Paid: $320 USD, including shipping and insurance
  5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/r1ZAAJBJ#VPnjoTzwQujQf3J0KgMUVw
  6. Index alignment: It may just be the angle, but the triangle at 12 seems slightly off when lined up with the shield and the 6 marker. The 3 marker also appears a bit lower than the 9.
  7. Dial Printing: OK
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Good
  10. Bezel: Lume pip align, all good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Look good overall, with slight gaps on the top left and bottom right. Not as tight as a VSF Sub, but still acceptable for this model right ?
  12. Timegrapher numbers: –2 s/d, amplitude 295, beat error 0.1ms
  13. Anything else you notice: Timegrapher numbers look strong. It also appears the lume mismatch issue has been corrected, which is great. Bracelet looks ok?
u/No_Focus_3668 — 1 day ago