Login

u/zarnrako

Image 1 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 2 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 3 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 4 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 5 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 6 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 7 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 8 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 9 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 10 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 11 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 12 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 13 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 14 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 15 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
Image 16 — [QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black
▲ 13 r/RepTimeQC

[QC] Omega Seamaster 300 Diver VSF Black

Hello guys,

Since i RL my first example here i am again hoping for your clear vision and honest opinion. Thanks in advance!

  1. ⁠Dealer name: NecoClock

  2. ⁠Factory name: VSF

  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster 300 Diver Black

  4. ⁠Price Paid: 358$

  5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/y4w3gSCD#kVP_CFnSjMaQ0l3mEOXBXQ

  6. ⁠Index alignment: looks better than the first qc… 3 is a bit cw tilted

  7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine for me

  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good to me

  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks to be good for me

  10. ⁠Bezel: looks fine, pip centered

  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): is ok… bottom right maybe litte bigger but all good for me

  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, amp 293 and err 0,1 …. Think thats fine.

  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: The tilted 3 is only thing not ok but i thinks not so dramatic and think about GL

Please help me with your wise experience! Have i overlooked something?Thanks in advance!

u/zarnrako — 14 hours ago