r/MensRights

99% of police, fire fighters and the military are men.

There are women in these roles but almost all of them are in support roles like back office clerical work.

EMTs are like 80% men.

The entire infrastructure of society is powered by men.

Yet women are constantly attacking us and slandering us and saying that we're all rapists and shit.

We really need to take a stand here. It's so fucking infuriating.

Someone at work today brought up the whole "95 million men are rapists" thing, and it just bothered the fuck out of me.

Remember when women pushed to have a female-only Uber service? Because men can't be trusted and we're all rapists?

Why don't we have a female-only police force? You call 911 and only women, show up.

Let's see how that works out.

I think a lot of men do not realize we are in a crisis because they do not typically encounter men’s rights issues until they have gone through a divorce, had children, and things start to go south.

Like, you need to get your first false rape claim before you realize that the world is fucked and that men are minorities.

We're victims in the society that WE created!

Isnt feminism a movement for womens rights? I noticed that every community almost always talks about how trash and how toxic men are, I mean lets assume that today there is no equal basic rights**(even though thats wrong),** is talking about the men in this system helpful? Or they should talk about the system itself?

Thats quite confusing to me, and many white knights are agreeing with them, yet they ignore those white knights and go for "toxic" men.

I feel like those feminists just like to say that it's rightful to dislike on all men without ever even considering anything else.

This just makes me sad. Link to post: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1snqu4e/a_new_statesman_poll_suggests_women_report_more/

The text generated:

Research indicates that teachers, on average, give boys lower grades than girls, even when boys perform equally or better on objective, anonymous tests. This grading gap is often attributed to teacher bias regarding behavior, as girls are frequently perceived as more attentive, industrious, and compliant, leading to better teacher-assigned grades. 

Key Findings on Teacher Grading Bias:

• Widespread Bias: Studies across the US and Europe show a consistent trend of girls receiving higher grades than boys of similar measured ability.
• Behavioral Factors: Teachers often incorporate non-cognitive factors, such as classroom behavior, participation, and organization, into grading, where girls tend to outperform boys.
• Subject Disparity: The grading bias against boys is prevalent in both literacy and mathematics.
• Long-Term Impact: This bias can have long-term consequences, as it can discourage boys from pursuing specific academic paths and contribute to the "gender gap" in student performance, with boys often showing less progress over time.
• Teacher Gender: Some studies have suggested that female teachers may, on average, award lower marks to boys than external examiners do, while male teachers may award them higher marks.
• Gap Widens with Age: The grading disparity against boys often widens from 4th to 8th grade,, although it may ease during the transition to 10th grade.  National Institutes of Health (.gov) +8

Potential Reasons for the Gap:

• Expectations: Teachers may hold different expectations for boys and girls, with a tendency to view girls as better behaved and more motivated.
• Behavioral Differences: Boys may exhibit behaviors that are less favoured in a classroom setting, such as lower attention spans or more disruptive behavior, which can negatively impact their grades.
• Subjective Grading: When grading is more subjective, teachers may, often unintentionally, favor girls over boys.  ScienceNorway +5

Consequences:

• Lower GPA: Girls have historically maintained higher grade point averages (GPA) than boys.
• Misleading Assessment: Teacher-assigned grades may not always accurately reflect the true academic potential or knowledge of male students, as seen in studies comparing teacher grades to anonymous test results.

 

Sources it used:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11521978/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Teachers/comments/1ne7bn2/teachers_its_time_to_admit_theres_gender_bias_in/

https://www.sciencenorway.no/forskningno-gender-differences-norway/why-boys-get-poor-grades/1554417

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nickmorrison/2022/10/17/teachers-are-hard-wired-to-give-girls-better-grades-study-says/

https://news.uga.edu/study-chalks-boys-lower-grades-up-to-conduct/

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272775718307714

https://www.in-mind.org/article/to-which-genders-disadvantage-are-school-grades-biased-girls-or-boys

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329341521\_Gender\_Bias\_in\_teachers'\_grading\_What\_is\_in\_the\_grade

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/female-teachers-accused-of-giving-boys-lower-marks-6943937.html

https://theweek.com/news/world-news/958209/teachers-give-higher-grades-to-girls

https://news.uga.edu/why-girls-do-better-in-school-010212/

https://aibm.org/research/boys-girls-and-grades-examining-gpa-and-sat-trends/

Not only the procedure itself but how much the privacy of a boy kid gets violated especially by women is horrendous. I want to hear people opinion on this. This thing eats me alive everyday how easily they have made men believe it is okay for them to cut their most excluaive organ!?

Hi, I've recently had an issue that leads me to believe I'm being slandered/defamed online on one of those FB groups the feminazis and bitter folks frequent.

Does anyone have any experience infiltrating such groups like that or the Tea App as a man that I can use to start collecting evidence to build a case to protect myself?

Let's not talk about these boys loneliness and mental health, instead discuss on how they can't be a competent workforce. They only want to extract labour from men.

https://preview.redd.it/z06ylnjf2bxg1.jpg?width=689&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=613c9d40ad0dceda9e3358c550d501ba54468a63

This presentation of data is deceptive. It conflates two different sources: the 1 in 5 women and 1 in 4 men figure comes from CDC self-reported surveys, while the '93.6% male perpetrator' figure comes from official legal case statistics. If the same CDC survey criteria were applied consistently, the data would show that women account for nearly half of the perpetrators of sexual violence.

According to data from the CDC (NISVS), the prevalence of men being 'made to penetrate' is comparable to women being raped. Furthermore, nearly 90% of male victims in these cases reported that the perpetrators were female.

Comparison of annual prevalence rates:

• 2010: 1.1% of women reported being raped, while 1.1% of men reported being made to penetrate.
• 2011: 1.6% of women reported being raped, compared to 1.7% of men made to penetrate.
• 2012: 1.0% of women reported being raped, while 1.7% of men made to penetrate.
• 2015: 1.2% of women reported being raped, compared to 0.7% of men made to penetrate.
• 2017: 2.3% of women reported being raped, while 1.3% of men made to penetrate.

https://www.newsweek.com/millions-of-clicks-on-sexual-assault-wheres-the-outrage-11846239

I guess you see this reflected in proper horror movies too.

Think of how the villain or deranged one is almost exclusively a man and the innocent victim we root for is very often a woman. Many of the youtube short horror films are often even more on the nose with their misandry than that.

Note: before any smart alec says that not every short movie follows that trend, of course there's a level of variety. Nevertheless, this is definitely a recurring theme.

People were fighting in the streets in this nice town accusing strangers. Men in Epsom, and men in the UK are owned a massive apology. Not only for the lies of this loon but for the fact that she is not being prosecuted.

It's rare for academic studies to ask men about their experiences of domestic violence - it breaks the dominant narrative. However a new paper looks at results from 13.898 men.

Lifetime IPV	Male Violent	Partner Violent
Physical Violence	7.4%	18.4%
Forced to have sex	1.7%	2.5%

Also their 2013-14 (Wave 1) data shows that male victims of IPV had nearly three times the odds of a suicide attempt in their lifetime.

One of the authors is the infamous feminist Zac Seidler - so expect spin. When men hit women, they "use IPV". When women hit men, the men have "been exposed to IPV" and that counts as "male involvement in IPV".

From Intimate partner violence and suicidality among Australian males

If you look at the history of parents (particularly in certain countries/regions in the world) preferring baby boys over baby girls, the dominant narrative that's circulated seems to be quite biased. Parents in those countries tend to prefer those baby boys because those baby boys are gonna make a mighty fine workhorse. They'll go out and face pressure to earn the lion's share of the family's income (to be used by the family ofc). They'll usually be the ones expected to do the most dangerous and physically taxing tasks. Women will work too but as someone who's done work outside and done domestic work, with all due respect, one tends to be a lot more harsh than the other.

I think this is ultimately a comment on how imposing gender expectations hurts everyone. It hurts the baby girls obviously and it hurts the boys/men because they'll carry so many of the toughest burdens and, for doing so, experience the pleasure of being called an oppressor or privileged asshole because he was pressured into filling a pre-assigned role that so often isn't exactly fun for him either.

He paid for her meal and still get shamed online and shit on