Hiring some one who has a side hustle
What do you think about hiring someone who has a side hustle. I personally think this might lead to a burnt out employee. Would love to hear your perspective.
What do you think about hiring someone who has a side hustle. I personally think this might lead to a burnt out employee. Would love to hear your perspective.
What do you guys think about hiring someone who you know runs a business on the side.
I do think it could lead to conflict of interest and an employee who is burnt out. But I could be wrong. Would love to see from others perspective!
Will pay 15K for consultancy around it. Needs to have experience in subscribing to API on api setu.
A project needs to have positive Net present value on CashInflows. Net PV = CF/(1+K) + Cf2/(1+K)^2…
But how do we figure out the discounting rate? The discounting rate to be used is simply the oppurtunity cost of the money that is going to be invested into the project (Machinery,Plant,Process etc). So in case of equity or the owners capital the oppertunity cost is the alternative best use of the capital. In case of the debt it is the increment of loan interest which could have been avoided. To understand the cost of debt is tricky, as the formula assumes that the debt increases by the interest rate [Why so? because it is assumed that the interest is being paid by Further borrowing]. So why further borrowing? We are paying interest from our revenue generated? Its so because here is the assumption (which can be considered more logical) that when we use revenue to pay off our interest liability we are missing the oppurtunity to retire our debt using that revenue. And hence the cost of this decision is the discounting rate.
Is my logic correct? Or is there anything i am missing?
A project needs to have positive Net present value on CashInflows. Net PV = CF/(1+K) + Cf2/(1+K)^2…
But how do we figure out the discounting rate? The discounting rate to be used is simply the oppurtunity cost of the money that is going to be invested into the project (Machinery,Plant,Process etc). So in case of equity or the owners capital the oppertunity cost is the alternative best use of the capital. In case of the debt it is the increment of loan interest which could have been avoided. To understand the cost of debt is tricky, as the formula assumes that the debt increases by the interest rate [Why so? because it is assumed that the interest is being paid by Further borrowing]. So why further borrowing? We are paying interest from our revenue generated? Its so because here is the assumption (which can be considered more logical) that when we use revenue to pay off our interest liability we are missing the oppurtunity to retire our debt using that revenue. And hence the cost of this decision is the discounting rate.
Is my logic correct? Or is there anything i am missing?
Need someone who has worked with WBLR and rules around it. Please dm! Won't lowball
The title says it all. I am looking for consultation on my Google ads on my various businesses. Kindly mention your asking in dm. Don't worry I won't lowball.