u/SirKrimzon

Image 1 — [Discussion] Is there a more washed brand than Kith that suffered a greater fall from grace?
Image 2 — [Discussion] Is there a more washed brand than Kith that suffered a greater fall from grace?

[Discussion] Is there a more washed brand than Kith that suffered a greater fall from grace?

I swear I’m not trying to be the lefty of kith, but I keep following him on insta in a sick way just to see how much more absurd and wack he can get.

Anyway, I think Ronnie every month or so opens wikiroulette.co and decides yep “that’s gonna be my next collab”.

Like bruh cmon, Jonah Hill wearing a heavy ass sweater for a summer collection selling kith lemonade with his face on it? What is bro smoking? Almost tempted to sell my kith x FLW sneakers because it’s embarrassing to be associated with kith now. Honestly, it’s so bad that I don’t even remember a time when kith was great. All my recent memories and associations with him are covered in a mountain of mediocre, low effort, uninspired, lame, washed dooky collabs.

Anyways, what’s the most washed brand you know analogous to the Steve Buscemi “how do you do kids” meme?

u/SirKrimzon — 2 days ago

Best infant car seat compatible with Gazelle S that doesn’t make me want to kill myself?

I just purchased the gazelle S which I love and tried to find an affordable infant car seat that was compatible and purchased the maxi cosi mico pro.

It is compatible, but it is an absolute pain to remove because I have to use an exceedingly large amount of force to squeeze the back of the car seat to then remove it from the stroller. I can barely do it so I know my small wife cannot.

Is there a infant car seat you guys recommend that is compatible? Ideally that works with the adapters that came with the stroller. Thank you.

reddit.com
u/SirKrimzon — 6 days ago

Best infant car seat compatible with Gazelle S that doesn’t make me want to kill myself?

I just purchased the gazelle S which I love and tried to find an affordable infant car seat that was compatible and purchased the maxi cosi mico pro.

It is compatible, but it is an absolute pain to remove because I have to use an exceedingly large amount of force to squeeze the back of the car seat to then remove it from the stroller. I can barely do it so I know my small wife cannot.

Is there a infant car seat you guys recommend that is compatible? Ideally that works with the adapters that came with the stroller. Thank you.

reddit.com
u/SirKrimzon — 6 days ago
▲ 474 r/Watches

[Discussion] Watch Hot Takes! I'll go first, the modern Omega Seamaster divers are HIDEOUS

I know this will upset a lot of people but I stand on the fact that the modern Omega Seamaster divers are some of the ugliest, most un-refined and grotesque watches out there. Where do I start? For starters, the bracelet has zero taper and the link design looks like something from a cheap 70s seiko. The helium escape valve is an abomination sticking out at 10 o clock which offers no practicality for most people and is largely a gimmick. There is no cohesion to this watch. The hands are atrocious, the wavy dial is gimmicky, the clasp is about the size of an ancient spartan shield, and it looks like an awkward franken-watch that is attempting to be both dressy and sporty but achieving neither. In my head it's attempting to be that perfect "hybrid" watch for Omega, analogous to the Rolex Date-Just or Cartier Santos, but it lacks all the charm of those watches.

Vintage Seamasters are amazing and I am not knocking the movement of this watch (it is very good). I just think visually, it is quite hideous and honestly I don't know why it's so popular. Do people like it because it's "ugly but cute" in a similar vein to Crocs or Birkenstocks? Or do people just love James Bond that much and are willing to overlook the $7000 furuncle on their wrist?

Please share your hot takes!

u/SirKrimzon — 6 days ago
▲ 23 r/Cartier

Why in the world doesn’t Cartier make a modern Tank Louis in a manual wind movement and yellow gold?

It’s literally the quintessential tank model but all we have are a large automatic and quartz models.

We just want a medium yellow gold tank with a manual movement!

u/SirKrimzon — 6 days ago
▲ 210 r/ThrowingFits+1 crossposts

What’s your daily driver watch?

I’ve been into watches probably longer than fashion so I’ve always been curious, what you guys daily? Do you even wear a watch? Do you consider it unnecessary or more fashion nowadays given that they are largely relegated to the realm of beautiful antiquated objects? Do you think about them when designing outfits?

My grail and daily is a vintage Cartier Santos Galbee. I find it much more elegant and refined compared to the modern Santos. I can literally wear this watch with any outfit and it works. Monochrome, earth tones, T shirt, suit, whatever. It works.

Curious to see what y’all rock.

u/SirKrimzon — 7 days ago

I know this is a very open ended question and the history of streetwear has spanned several decades and that there are different sub genres of streetwear.

For me the answer unequivocally is the Air Jordan 1. I don’t think any other sneaker has had more cultural influence than this sneaker. It’s a classic, quite versatile in different styles and has remained relevant for 40 years.

That is incredibly hard to do. The supreme box logo hasn’t done that. Bape camo hasn’t had that staying power. Stussy is the goat but it doesn’t have the same cultural cache as the Jordan brand.

It’s instantly recognizable and even though currently it’s a little less popular than in years past, sneakers are making a comeback amongst the masses and this shoe will be on the top again imo.

Let me know your thoughts and what pieces you consider the greatest of all time. It doesn’t have to be footwear, it can be any fashion item.

Also, if you guys have any interest in other fashion genres besides streetwear, please check out my subreddit /r/threadtalks. This is the only place on Reddit for genre-agnostic enthusiasts ranging from streetwear fans to vintage heads and even avant-garde and menswear nerds to share knowledge in an open-minded and unique way. We discuss all manner of fashion history, personal style and garment construction. Hope to see you there.

u/SirKrimzon — 8 days ago

Thought this was an interesting idea. I was looking back at some of the older fits my younger self thought were peak, and it was cool to see how it changed over the years. Some things stayed the same while others didn’t. I went through the skinny jean phase where I wore nothing but Express tees two sizes too small, my MFA phase, my ALD fucc boi phase and now I’m not sure what I am. I suppose a mix of everything that came before. I’m continuing to learn and try different things though I’m far more comfortable in my style than I was before. It’ll be curious to see what I look like in another 15 years.

Hopefully this starts a trend of you guys posting similar collages.

Feel free to roast, but post fits if you do so we can roast you back.

Dweeb mods may remove this so I also posted it on my subreddit /r/threadtalks if this gets taken down.

u/SirKrimzon — 9 days ago

I mean, it’s clear that Ronnie has been putting out absolute dogshit cornball products with the lamest possible collaborations known to mankind for the last few years but, this is a new low for me. Jimmy Fallon and a Sandwich shop? Is the dude literally just pulling ideas out of a random idea generator and running with it? Does he have anyone else in his company to tell him no?

I don’t even want the old kith back anymore. At this point it’s like watching a very sad movie that gets worse with every scene.

u/SirKrimzon — 10 days ago

Bit of a click bait title admittedly, but I think for a lot of us, we mask our absurd materialistic habits with some warped reasoning. I certainly do and I just want to lay it out and hope others resonate.

For me lately, the desire of buying “timeless” garments that I can wear “forever” are my new crutch. For example, I’ve been on the hunt for the perfect vintage navy double breasted blazer for a while now, constantly scouring eBay saved searches and wasting obscene amounts of money on returns.

The truth is, I barely wear a sport coat or blazer. My work doesn’t require dressing up and when I do “dress up”, I rarely reach for a formal jacket.

But I have this idea in my head of the navy DB blazer with gold buttons being this 'must-have' or 'timeless' garment—or any other enticing marketing buzzword thrown about by countless #menswear dudes on IG—that I have now convinced myself I must own.

Even when I’m 60, I’ll be able to wear this, I just have to not gain weight or change my body shape too much for the next 30 years

Papa Ralph has been wearing one for 60 years, and he still looks great

These are the types of thoughts I have and now I can’t get out of my head the desire to buy this garment I will probably wear once a year if that.

Anyways, how do you guys justify your clothing addiction?

If topics like this interest you, please check out r/threadtalks where we already have an in-depth discussion about this topic and others going. This is the only place on Reddit for genre-agnostic enthusiasts ranging from menswear nerds to vintage heads and even avant-garde and streetwear fans to share knowledge in an open-minded and unique way. We discuss all manner of fashion history, personal style and garment construction. Hope to see you there.

reddit.com
u/SirKrimzon — 10 days ago

What’s an article of clothing, accessory or piece of footwear that you purchased that you get so much use out of, it’s considered one of your best purchases ever?

For me it’s my red wing flatboxes. I think they perfectly straddle the spectrum all the way from dressy to rugged in a way that few boots do. There’s just enough brown details where I can wear it with earth tones, but it also looks perfect in an all black monochromatic outfit. The cherry on top is the Klondike leather which reveals brown undertones over time as the top coat wears off. Unlike most red wings, it’s quite sleek and the toe box collapses with time. It also has tonal stitching which adds to its versatility unlike most RW with that one white stitch which reads super casual.

Also, if you guys have any interest in other fashion genres besides heritage wear, please check out my subreddit /r/threadtalks. This is the only place on Reddit for genre-agnostic enthusiasts ranging from menswear nerds to vintage heads and even avant-garde and streetwear fans to share knowledge in an open-minded and unique way. We discuss all manner of fashion history, personal style and garment construction. Hope to see you there.

u/SirKrimzon — 13 days ago
▲ 25 r/CCW

I’ve read enough of anecdotal comments online that I’m having second thoughts about the BG as my EDC. I prioritize small footprint over all and love the form factor and feel of a larger gun in a smaller package with a 10 round capacity. But if the reliability issues are truly a concern, I may look elsewhere.

reddit.com
u/SirKrimzon — 13 days ago

I used to watch his stuff like crazy back in the day. Occasionally, he had some poignant insights into the nature of fashion and style, but 90% of his vids are idle babbling. Dude had jokes on occasions

u/SirKrimzon — 14 days ago
▲ 1 r/japanesestreetwear+1 crossposts

If so and you’d like a place to discuss every manner of men’s and woman’s fashion, please join /r/threadtalks. I made it as a common hub for fashion nerds from all corners of the internet (streetwear, haute couture, menswear, vintage, prep etc) to gather and nerd out about fashion history, construction, theory and personal style. It’s not catered towards beginners rather those with some sense of style and knowledge, which you guys clearly have more in the heritage world. Please join if you’re interested and I look forward to seeing your contributions!

u/SirKrimzon — 14 days ago

Wanted to share a quick inspo album of pure unadulterated costumes. We all know better than to wear anything remotely close to what’s pictured outside of maybe Halloween, but this is purely for entertainment purposes and to laugh at. None of these individuals come close to replicating the heat we regularly drop on fit check Fridays.

We all know anything superfluous that does not have a function (think bandana, extra layers, hats etc) are purely performative, unnecessary and should only be worn by post modern feminists who read Kafka on the Shore in public. It is crucial you wear nothing outside of a Bronson Henley, Lemaire loafers, MFpen pants and an Evan Elordi jellyfish semen-died shirt.

Anyways, I hope you guys can enjoy a rare look at these creatures in their natural habitat. Gaze upon them as you may a group of wild orangutans at the zoo. However, be careful, as they’ve been known to snatch our legacy belts and whip their owners with them in the blink of an eye. I shudder as I write.

If you want to see more stupid costumes please join /r/ThreadTalks where we talk about costumes outside the realm of post minimalist NY based brands masquerading as Japanese ones.

u/SirKrimzon — 15 days ago
▲ 55 r/Cartier

Yes the normale is the original tank but their most famous model is the Louis Cartier. Out of all the references I would say the Cartier Tank Louis Cartier Ref. 78086 from the 1970s–80s is the quintessential version. It is yellow gold, with a white Paris dial, Roman numerals, blued hands, and manual-wind movement in the perfect classic size.

Do you guys think any other ref takes the crown for quintessential Tank Louis?

u/SirKrimzon — 16 days ago

I think there’s a case to be made that as we entered the digital era and more occupations started moving away from skilled labor and into service-desk jobs, innovation in novel clothing forms decreased.

Historically, most clothing came from one of three functional roots: the military, sportswear, or workwear. The fourth pillar, tailoring, is technically its own category, but it takes a lot of influence from the military (lapels came from old military tunics; jacket vents came from the necessity for cavalry units on horseback). Even the ancestor of black tie, the tailcoat, had equestrian (sporting) origins.

This is a *small* sample of some of the ubiquitous products that came from one of these three roots: lace-up boots, canvas sneakers, chinos, cardigans, T-shirts, denim jackets, watch caps and jeans. In addition, there are many fabric types commonly used today that had functional origins: corduroy, moleskin, and ripstop nylon, to name a few.

My question for you all is: Do you think we are lacking innovation and new forms in clothing because we don’t have the same needs as our ancestors? (I’m not talking about niche, designer, or haute couture stuff obviously—like Yohji and Rei’s deconstruction of form in the '80s—but rather clothing that has trickled into the Rolodex of common garments.) In the USA, during the 1950s, 37% of the population worked a desk job and 63% worked in blue-collar trades, compared to 71% and 29%, respectively, today. People are simply not working with their hands or in the agricultural sector as much as they used to. I don’t have the statistics for the rest of the world, but I’m sure it’s fairly similar across developed countries. Not to mention, there has not been a major, truly global conflict in 80 years.

I believe this shift has led to a lack of novel clothing forms predicated on need over the last 50 to 80 years. What do you guys think? Am I oblivious to some obvious, major recent invention in the nature of clothing form outside of highly technical athleisure (which is not really an innovation in form, but rather in fabric)? Or are new brands forever cursed to recontextualize and reinterpret vintage garments with slightly unique silhouettes and fabrics for the rest of time?

reddit.com
u/SirKrimzon — 17 days ago