



Next Question: The Bow
In the ongoing saga of preparing my nephew’s old 3/4 violin for my daughter to use in middle school orchestra:
Next up, the bow.
I was all set to just buy her a new bow on the assumption that the bow that came with this violin was probably crap.
But actually it has two bows. The orange-ish one is, I believe, even crappier than I thought it would be. Plus the hair is super sparse (half gone) and it’s a little warped, and I am sure it isn’t worth putting new hair on it.
But the other one is in much better shape. It may need new hair for no other reason than it’s been sitting around for at least 16 years, but the hair that’s on it is full and looks like it was probably pretty new when my nephew quit playing it. What I do NOT know is whether it’s a decent bow or not. I don’t have the skills or knowledge to know what to look for.
I can say it’s an octagonal design (if I’m not miscounting the sides). It’s much heavier than the round orange bow. It doesn’t seem to be warped in any way.
Does hair have to be refreshed just from age alone if it looks like it’s in good shape? I haven’t rosined it up yet since I am still also missing a string on the violin. But it does at least play.
Assuming it needs hair, should I rehair it or stick with my original plan to get a 3/4 carbon fiber bow?
I can’t find a maker’s mark on it anywhere. Any clues to whether it’s a decent bow or just a nice looking piece of junk?