u/According_Pickle954

All i see on my feeds are mostly ppl getting internships, but hardly see anyone posting about getting new full time roles nowadays even on my LinkedIn feeds.

What does that means, is that a sign of things to come?

Hi everyone,

I’m trying to get a more grounded view on Celestica (CLS) and would appreciate perspectives from people who follow AI infrastructure or semiconductor-related names.

CLS recently reported strong earnings and continues to benefit from AI infrastructure demand (servers, networking, hyperscaler supply chain exposure). It’s positioned in the broader AI ecosystem alongside names like AVGO, MU, SNDK, and AMD.

Despite this, the stock has been volatile and has pulled back / consolidated after its recent run-up, which is making it hard to interpret whether the market is presenting an opportunity or signaling that expectations are already fully priced in.

A few things I’m trying to understand:

Does CLS still represent a value/growth opportunity given its strong earnings and AI exposure? Is the recent price weakness more about short-term rotation/profit-taking rather than fundamentals?

How do you view its positioning compared to other AI infrastructure / semiconductor names?

After the earnings beat and guidance, is the current pullback a potential entry point or just normal post-rally consolidation?

Im trying to understand how people are thinking about its longer-term positioning within the AI infrastructure cycle.

Would appreciate any insights.

Hey everyone, I’m planning on buying Cerebras (CBRS) when it IPOs this Thursday (May 14th). I’m a retail investor using Interactive Brokers (IBKR).

Given that the IPO is reportedly 20x oversubscribed and the price range was just bumped to $125–$135, I know I won’t get the institutional price. I’m trying to figure out the best execution strategy to avoid getting "bagged" by the Day 1 hype.

My current thoughts:

1. Wait for the afternoon dip: I've heard most IPOs peak at the 11 AM public open and cool off around 2 PM ET once the initial flippers exit.
2. The "Day 2" Strategy: Is it statistically better to just wait for Friday morning to see if there’s a sell-off after the first-day excitement?
3. Limit Orders: Since I'm on IBKR, I plan on avoiding market orders to stay safe from the spread.

For those who have traded hyped AI IPOs recently (like ARM or others), what was your best entry point? Did you buy the opening candle, or wait a few days for the volatility to settle?

The real question is what price and valuation are u guys be willing to pay for this IPO. I also wanted this, but at what price are u all willing to pay for it?

Hi everyone,

I’ve been following the recent rally in SanDisk (SNDK) and other memory-related AI plays, and I’m trying to understand whether this cycle is genuinely different from past memory cycles or if it’s still likely to follow the traditional boom-bust pattern that memory stocks are known for.

The bull case seems strong:

AI/data center demand is exploding

hyperscaler spending remains very high

memory/storage demand for AI workloads appears structural

earnings and margins have been improving rapidly

At the same time, memory has historically been one of the most cyclical parts of semiconductors

shortages → pricing spikes → huge earnings growth

then eventually oversupply → margin compression → sharp corrections

What I’m trying to figure out is:

Is AI fundamentally changing the long-term outlook for memory companies like SNDK?

Or is this still ultimately another memory supercycle that could reverse once supply catches up?

For those who’ve followed past memory cycles, does the current setup feel materially different?

If someone is considering entering after the recent run-up, how would you think about the risk/reward here?

Im trying to understand how investors are thinking about the durability of this AI-driven memory demand cycle.

Would appreciate any perspectives from people who follow the semiconductor/memory space closely.

Hi everyone,

I’m trying to get a more grounded view on Celestica (CLS) and would appreciate perspectives from long-term investors here.

CLS has had a strong run over the past year due to AI infrastructure demand (servers, networking, hyperscaler supply chain exposure), but recently the stock has been quite volatile and consolidating despite continued AI tailwinds.

CLS operates in the same broader AI infrastructure ecosystem as companies like Broadcom (AVGO), Micron (MU), SanDisk (SNDK), and AMD — benefiting from the ongoing AI buildout across data centers, networking, and hardware supply chains.

However, unlike some of these higher-profile AI names, CLS seems to have less hype and attention, despite being exposed to similar demand tailwinds.

A few things I’m trying to understand:

• Is CLS still in a strong long-term AI infrastructure growth phase, or has most of the re-rating already happened?
• How does its growth profile compare to more prominent AI beneficiaries like AVGO, MU, SNDK, and AMD?
• Does CLS’s relatively “under-the-radar” profile suggest inefficiency/opportunity, or slower re-rating potential?
• After its strong run and recent consolidation, is this still a good entry point or has most of the AI-related upside already been priced in?
• How do you view its positioning compared to other AI infrastructure / hardware names?
• Does the recent consolidation suggest healthy digestion after a strong move, or slower future upside?
• At current valuation levels, is it still attractive as a long-term compounder, or more of a “wait for pullback” setup?

Would appreciate any insights from people who follow the company or the AI infrastructure space closely.

Cerebras Systems (CBRS) is set to go public on the Nasdaq around May 14, 2026, aiming to raise up to $3.5 billion at a valuation of approximately $26–$40 billion. The AI chipmaker is offering 28 million shares priced between $115–$125, driven by massive demand for its wafer-scale engines.

Have to Start from Somewhere first, why not Start with the Civil Servants first?

Can start with organizing dating events for Civil Servants.

Had many encounters where the company simply as me to do what is essentially free work for them but they arent serious in hiring.

After taking so much time and effort to do the pre-interview assignments to an acceptable standard. And even got called up for the interview later on to discuss the work that i done, but eventually always got ghosted or rejected later on.

There's even once when the hiring manager told me that they change their hiring criteria to require a PHD for the job position, after i have already submitted all my assignments.

I didnt want to waste my time to do free work for such companies only to get ghosted later on.

How do i tell early on if a company is simply asking their candidates to do free work for them or if they are really serious in hiring?

Who will win, but sides fought until either side is annihilated. Which means both fought until either China or Vietnam is fully conquered and occupied by the other party.