r/filmphotography

i started shooting film august of last year, so i'm still learning. i'm not really a photographer of any short but i've always liked taking pictures of what it see. i don't really know what makes a good photo but my friend said it's if i like it or not.

EDIT: Fujifilm 200. Minolta x-370, MD 50 mm f1.7

Shots from the past year by Lance McMullan [@lance_mcmullan]. All taken on Douglas Island in Juneau, Alaska.

I have a minimalistic kit - only one lens, two 2-shot film holders, no light meter. I go out most days and take 4 shots, develop them at home that day and scan them. I’ve used consistent film for a year, so I know how long to expose for depending on the time of day, weather, and bellows extension.

I don’t plan my photography, I walk into nature until an idea hits me. Since I’m documenting random moments throughout the year, I end up with ‘seasonal’ collections of winter ice & summer water.

Nikon FE Fomapan 400 - 70 mins standing development hc110

Taken with Bronica ETRSi film camera +135w back.

I recently bought this sick working camera new in box but I’m pretty new to working with film and ect. I know the camera is pretty old but do they still make film for it or am I going to have to shoot on expired film. Any and all help appreciated

I'm pretty sure a Priest used to live here. It was clearly built for one person. It's the smallest one bedroom house I've ever seen and there is an abandoned church right next door.

I've spent thousands of dollars on glass over the years but this Canon FD 28MM f2.8 is the best $200 I've ever spent. it's magic.

hello guys. so i have these photos that i took using canon ftb and kodak tmax 400. i decided to develop and scan myself using my phone (kodak mobile film scanner app). i have the light panel and scan it in dark (not total darkness). i use pctea developer. as you can see in the first photo, the scan somehow look edgy (i dont know the correct term to use here). my suspicion is that it is my phone (scanning problem and not the photo itself). is there any part of the processes that i need to do to upgrade the result?

On my recent roll on my Canon FTb-QL on Kodak 400, the shots that are underexposed seem to have vertical lines. Other shots that are exposed appropriatelyish have no lines. Is that a common result of not having enough light? For example in the baby pic, the one that is decent is f5.8 at 1/1000, then the bad one is f16 at 1/1000. The bad one has lines like other lowly exposed photos. Just odd to me. The last two are examples from the roll with no vertical lines.