r/CrusaderKings

🔥 Hot ▲ 938 r/CrusaderKings

There should be an Erectile Dysfunction Elder Trait.

Look, we're all adults here (or at least we all pretend to be). It doesn't make sense that my 80 year old, nearly blind, arthritic, and borderline senile Sultan is still regularly siring children with his 4 wives just because the wives are in their 20s. Viagra doesn't exist, there's no way the man has the blood pressure necessary to maintain an erection, let alone the stamina for the performance. The game already decreases fertility somewhat with age but the new Elder Traits provide a framework for a greater solution: add an Erectile Dysfunction Elder Trait.

reddit.com
u/Priordread — 13 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 297 r/CrusaderKings

Some bastard blacksmith killed my son

Fighting in Hungary, my favorite son dies, and right before I save scum to take it back, I do a double-take at who it was that killed him.

R5 - Henry from KCD kills my son in battle.

u/formalbatman1 — 8 hours ago

Unpopular Opinion: I don't want Paradox to add navy to the game

I know it would be more historically accurate to have navy represented in the game, but I am really worried if it is added, it would just add a lot of unnecessary hassle. Part of it is that I don't trust Paradox to do navy in a way that would be fun, considering that every other Paradox GSG has a really, really tedious navy system (especially CK2 and HOI4).

In fact, one of my favorite quality of life features coming to CK3 was the fact that I didnt have to waste a bunch of time building ships, raising them, moving them next to the army, embarking the army (which almost always didnt fit on one trip meaning I would need to do multiple trips), moving the ships next to the coast and then disembarking. Just to land a simple naval invasion. Instead, I could just tell the army where I wanted it to go and the army naval invaded on its own.

Again, I know that it is historically inaccurate, and there are some ways to make it more representative of history (like making troop embarkation a tribal innovation that the Khazars don't have access to at the start so they can't invade Constantinople). But overall I don't think exact historical accuracy should come at the cost of enjoyable gameplay. Ck3 isn't EU5, it's not a simulation. I would much rather just tell the army where to go and then they go. Even other games like Civ6 do this exact thing and nobody has an issue with it.

Anyway that's just my personal opinion

reddit.com
u/3pointI — 4 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 1.5k r/CrusaderKings

Chapter 5

By God Alone confirmed for September

Silk and Silver for November

u/Humluc — 19 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 232 r/CrusaderKings

After Ch. V what else is “missing” from Ck2?

So with Chapter V bringing merchant republics & trade routes and a catholic rework (cardinals, elections, etc), there is only a few things that are not yet implemented in any way from Ck2:

- Societies (secret & warrior/ monastic)

- Council mechanics

- Supernatural events! (Jesus gives military advice +30 martial)

- Navies (unconfirmed as of today)

… and who could forget the fan-favorite: Sunset Invasion!

Any other features u would love to return in Chapter VI and onwards?

reddit.com
u/TheIncredibleYojick — 14 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 973 r/CrusaderKings

Major fix to AI court language selection

This single bullet in the patch notes is a sleeper Big Deal. It should completely fix the issue of the entire world deciding to speak Chinese.

u/BeeInABlanket — 17 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 209 r/CrusaderKings+1 crossposts

Thoughts on new max Domain Limit ?

I Personally think this is a disgrace. Max Domain limit has been reduced by 11 (-10, presumably for Eastern Roman Emperors, since the crown now has requirements to be used). While the core premise of rebalancing Domain limit away from stewardship is good Imo, they definitely overdid it to a point where Domain limit is now a scarce resource. I think they should add back at least 5-6 of the lost Domain Limit to other sources like for example making a Tier 5 Education worth 5 Domain limit or returning Domain limit to one early and high Medieval Innovation each, what do you think ?

u/elite_memster — 17 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 765 r/CrusaderKings

The Byzantine Emperor just breathed a sigh of relief

R5 : The Crown of Justinian now only give +1 domain if you are the Byzantine Emperor

u/neilyoung57 — 17 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 1.9k r/CrusaderKings

Why is ruler dancing

For whatever reason my perfectly health ruler is dancing. Ignore that i didn't screen record im not screen recording for a five seconds

R:5 the video is so you can see my ruler dancing

u/Sugeroptus — 23 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 77 r/CrusaderKings

King Robert of Sicily and his seeing-eye wife

He's not blind yet, but he will be soon. Also just watching him shake and squint made me feel bad for him

u/Wonderful-Big-8044 — 7 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 165 r/CrusaderKings

My Henry became the King of Egypt!

With the new update I immediately started a campaign as Henry and by luck a crusade for Egypt has started so I joined it and I was just throwing my soldiers to die into Salah Ad-Din's armies, so that I could get score in the crusade, and finally my Henry became the king of Egypt.

u/Gold-Tangerine-7944 — 11 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 159 r/CrusaderKings

That domain limit change though..

Really liking the domain limit update from what I've played so far. feels a little weird not bum rushing down stewardship first, but God does it also feel good not to have to. Was pretty hesitant when I first heard the changes, pleasantly surprised so far. Frees up some room for RP.

reddit.com
u/JustLukeAtThat — 13 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 498 r/CrusaderKings

Investiture Controversy in the new expansions

it keeps getting better

r5: the new circle on the right shows the symbols of the empire and pope, likely representing the investiture controversy

u/BitEffective3107 — 18 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 292 r/CrusaderKings

Law Rework?

So maybe Silk and song Silver will bring us a rework for laws (and councils?) even before a possible "Conclave"-like DLC in 2027?

u/Nofarwell — 18 hours ago