r/CerebrasSystems
Deploying 250MW for openAI by end of 2026?
How the hell would they achieve that? They barely have 35-50MW ready today - that means they would have to 5x their output in 8 months, or run the risk of renegotiating or worse, having openAI pull out of their contract entirely, It would be near impossible to execute. Most of their DC are “promising” 2027 readiness. The majority of valuation mostly comes mostly from the openAI contract, with UAE customers and hardware sales not even making the company close to the IPO valuation.
The stock would definitely dip if the targets aren’t reached, or more contract acquisitions don’t happen directly after IPO - their waferscale chip is only ideal for small-mid models, requires purchasing the whole CS-3 system to take advantage of the chip, has limited training etc etc.
Can anyone try to sell me on why this stock is still a buy at an IPO price reaching $160? The openAI deal just isn’t solid enough.
Edit: the 250MW number is from the S-1:
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2021728/000162828026025762/exhibit1011-sx1.htm
250MW of Capacity by the end of calendar year 2026”, with an additional 250MW by end of 2027 (totaling 500MW), and a further 250MW by end of 2028 (totaling 750MW
Arm, SoftBank made last-ditch effort to buy Cerebras before IPO
msn.comJust like the duracell battery: it just keeps going, and going, and going...
Cerebras Is Asking IPO Buyers to Finance an AI Capacity Buildout
ipogrid.comCerebras to raise IPO price range to $150-$160 as demand surges, sources say
finance.yahoo.comFigma was in the same situation as Cerebras
Figma was oversubscribed 40x, from 33$ share launched at 89$, peak 2 days later at 125$ and went downhill since there.
Although, Figma isnt in the same league as Cerebras's moat and was easy to see a freaking second rate Adobe wasnt worth that much at 100$(50b) , I still dont trust to buy this shit if it does the same, aka , launching at 250-300$ ( fully diluted mkt cap of 80-100b) on IPO day. Company isnt worth half of SNDK without being proven yet.
What do you think?
Fully diluted MKT cap including
- The OpenAI Elephant (33.4M shares): A massive warrant held by OpenAI. This is the single biggest dilutive factor outside of the founders.
- Employee & Insider Pay (48.5M shares): This includes stock options with a very cheap strike price ($4.97) and RSUs that vest specifically because the IPO is happening.
- Future Hiring Pool (45.9M shares): Shares set aside for the "2026 Plan" and Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) to attract new talent post-IPO.
- Executive Bonuses (9M shares): Performance-based shares (PRSUs) for the founders/executives.
- Recent Warrants/Issues (6.4M shares): Miscellaneous shares and high-priced warrants ($100 strike) issued just before the IPO.
at 130$ with all this dilution including , mkt cap is around 40b, so a 300$ will be around 100b
So when you decide to buy the IPO, what MKT CAP fully diluted valuation you think it s a good bet?
Cerebras Systems plans to raise IPO price range - Bloomberg
msn.comIPO & OpenAI Deal - low multiple or am I misunderstanding?
Cerebras is IPOing next week around $125/share implying a ~$40B valuation. Help me understand the multiple here because something feels off.
They have a Master Relationship Agreement with OpenAI signed in January 2026 worth more than $20 billion over 3 years - 250 megawatts of AI compute per year in 2026, 2027, and 2028 for a base of 750MW total. That implies roughly $6-7 billion in annual revenue just from OpenAI alone.
On top of that OpenAI has expansion options for an additional 1.25 gigawatts through 2030 which could push total contract value above $50 billion if exercised.
Their 2025 revenue was $510 million. So if the OpenAI deal kicks in fully they're going from $510M to potentially $6-7B in annual revenue almost overnight.
At $40B valuation and $6-7B in forward revenue that's roughly a 6-7x revenue multiple - which for a high growth semiconductor/AI infrastructure company seems almost cheap compared to what Nvidia trades at.
What am I missing? Is the market discounting execution risk on delivering 250MW per year? The customer concentration? The OpenAI kill switch clause?
The price list has been released. To be honest, I’m a bit surprised, because the price is much lower than I expected. From HIive, the price is already around $180, so this pricing is definitely lower than what I expected… I was hoping it would be at least around $150.
news says CRBS oversubscribed 20X, does it mean IPO buy shirnks 20 times?
suppose you indicate 400 shares of $125 for IPO intentional buy with underwriter like etrade, then you get only 20 shares with $200??? is that the case?
Etrade just alerted. Expected pricing 5/13
if Cerebras's architecture is the future, 10x Nvidia replacement shouldn't at all cost all port all resource to Cerebras instead Nvidia, accelerate development and resolve constraint
why not intentionally sacrifice short-term Nvidia scale to accelerate Cerebras long-term?
Anyone with technical knowledge can explain
base on cerebras current constraint and strength, if constraint was solved practically, wouldn't that pick them no brainer?
if reward clear why don't at all cost resolve the constraint Cerebras face, then nvidia can gone for good with groq.
base on company ranking cycle, we would sense: who lead wrong direction was the one have most resources and wasted most, and who lead right dir access to little or none.
cerebras 10× intelligent mass per time passes for both training and inference (if you total the time u run on nvidia minus cerebras, that's the number u just wasted waiting on nvidia, and eventually shipped 10x slower, overtime 10x less usable intelligence).
for user experience, here is the story. even 4G to 5G most barely notice diff(battery drains was the one much noticeable but like nobody know it), but still rest people choose 5G think is upper replace and worth the higher price, dont even talked initial 5g infra cost. who one bought ergonomic keyboard from logi tech, and they not even sell split keyboard
and when come to the real innovation side here, it become inverse. ppl keep port their $ to legacy gpu co, instead of exponentially accelerate Cerebras.
other some few downside i know like: 3× to 11× higher price on api (that's ceil but i still unsure the expense cost) and dont support img input.
A History and Analysis of Cerebras
I’ve followed this company for years and this might be the single best piece I’ve read on Cerebras that summarizes their history and lays out a solid investment thesis. Enjoy.
https://gannoncapital.substack.com/p/cerebras-systems-the-nvidia-killer
I think Taalas has a bright future and could end up owning edge AI chips potentially putting small models into laptops or workstation and be the hard coded brain of cars and robots. But I also have to imagine if Cerebras purchased Taalas or licensed their tech in a partnership, they produce hard coded wafers with Cerebras redundant pathways and wafer cooling. You could see frontier models air cooled with crazy small energy foot print and absolutely unimaginable speed.