

I take it back ,I don’t think audiobooks count as reading in the same way anymore.
I’ve always defended audiobook listeners because, at the end of the day, you still consumed the story and the content of the book. Personally, I don’t listen to audiobooks because I zone out too much, but I never saw them as less than reading.
But after finishing Dear Debbie by Freida McFadden and going through the reviews on goodreads (Americans, before you come for me: I’m not from there and I will not be boycotting Amazon), I noticed something interesting. A lot of the people giving the book less than 3 stars had listened to the audiobook instead of physically reading it.
And it made me wonder: how sure are you that you hated the actual writing and not the narrator’s performance? A bad narrator can completely change the experience of a book the tone, pacing, emotions, tension, even how intelligent or annoying characters sound. Some narrators overact, others sound bored, and some voices just don’t fit the story at all.
So then I started checking reviews for other books, and I noticed the same pattern. A surprising number of negative reviews mention that the person listened to the book rather than read it. At that point, it stops feeling like they are only reviewing the author’s work,sometimes they are also reviewing the performance of the narrator without separating the two.