u/richandepressed

I know it might sound weird for a lot of people, but I have a simple theory about the afterlife. Again, I don't know if I should believe it or not, but it's a theory that assumes two things that could be really simple to assume, which would make it a very simple theory technically.

The theory is based on two points:

1. We could assume that NDEs (Near-Death Experiences) are truly unexplainable. I mean, some of them are actually unexplainable. We could assume that, though I don't know if I actually believe it or not.

2. If NDEs are unexplainable, and if every NDE is shaped by what people truly believe deep down—and everyone is different—it would technically mean that the afterlife is just decided by our own consciousness at the moment of dying.

Essentially, it means that our own awareness and consciousness actually shape the afterlife. I mean, it sounds similar to the Law of Attraction or manifestation or whatever, but technically, if step one is true, it would sound logical.

But I don't know, it might just be stupid. Anyways, give me your thoughts, guys. Don't be too harsh with the critics; I'm just theorizing here.

I heard there were NDEs that described physical events that were happening while the person was unconscious which is really odd and could perhaps prove a literal separation of consciousness from the body.

However I don’t think it did happen but I heard the claim there are some NDEs like that so I really wonder if there actually was and if yes what afterlife did they describe ?

First of all, a lot of people seem to say that NDEs describe an afterlife with love and peace, where everything is going to be good. But here is the thing: as humans, we live across a wide spectrum of emotions. Reducing the human experience to one emotion sounds really boring.

Think about it: it would be really boring to just have love and peace constantly with no variation at all and literally no friction. Why do you guys enjoy watching basketball, for example? It is because basketball has two opposing teams trying to win something. There are people trying and people competing, which involves a lot of different emotions. It is not just because LeBron James likes to jump and laugh.

Now, let's also take the Abrahamic heaven perspective. It doesn't make much sense to have everything in abundance, because in that case, nothing really becomes valuable, and therefore everything becomes boring. It just sounds really simplistic.

A punishment also doesn’t make much sense because pain is a human feeling made to biologically recognize danger, so focusing on that feeling to punish also seem really simplistic.

Let's just judge purely from the experience. A lot of people claim the afterlife is love and peace; however, it doesn't make any sense why it would be that.

On this earth, we have a lot of different emotions and states of mind. There is anger, there is excitement, and so much more; it isn't only love and peace.

I think it does reinforce the theory that NDEs could just be the consciousness trying to comfort itself, rather than really experiencing the afterlife.

Because if we just look at it sweeping away all of the emotions it's just nonsensical to assume that we live a earthly life with all of the emotions we have on the spectrum, and then go to the afterlife and just keep one emotion.

A lot of NDEs seem to be really emotional and describe love and peace as being in the afterlife, suggesting that everything is good. However, from a purely spiritual point of view (and I know a lot of people are not like this), we have a lot of frequencies in our dimension right now a lot more than just love and peace. I can name others like anger, fear, etc. The way humans operate is by shifting between these frequencies. It would be nonsensical if, in the afterlife, there is only the frequency of love and peace.

Every time I see an NDE, a lot of people say it is a place of love and there are no problems, but doesn't that sound boring?

I mean think about it, do you guys actually feel excited by a world where nothing happens and where the only thing present is “love” and peace ? It sounds more like cope to me honestly, a bad cope. I don’t know if the consciousness really imagine that in an NDE tho.

Do you guys think that tech and AI could ever totally imitate human sex and completely take it over and give the elites the total power over people’s desires or is there a spiritual aspect to it they can’t replicate ? Is sexuality a part of the anima or is it simply a part of the physical body ?

Also, if we go into the Neuralink debate, could these guys actually totally control human consciousness through brain chips that gives immediate dopamine and that can map thoughts ? How far can these guys go with tech technically ? Is there any minor ?

I wonder what body dictated physical attraction, would it be the spiritual that dictates our subconscious choices of attraction or would it be the physical ? Perhaps the anima could play a role on that ?

I just saw a video that shows that Christians in Ethiopia don’t eat pork, have a call to prayer, take their shoes off before entering the church and have separate male and female sections.

What is interesting is that Ethiopian Christians are some of the first Christians with an almost untouched Christianity that shows that the 2 religions are actually similar so the fact that Islam got that accurately is interesting.

It actually strengthens the Quranic claim of a continuation, which could show truth or perhaps show that the founders knew a lot about Christianity

Why do looks subconsciously occupy such a high place for us ? Why do guys especially value looks so much and do so much to get a physically attractive partner ? If you look a bit deeper a lot of society is driven by people wanting to get laid that contribute to the economy so honestly why are looks and especially facial attractiveness so important that people constantly chase it ?

What is the actual biological drive behind it?

The only things I seem to see are random studies focused on emotional psychology, which isn't clear, or cross-cultural studies that are influenced by our modern world. I'm really asking about what you're guessing from a strictly neurological and biological perspective.

What matters specifically is why is it so important for us ? Why is it so centered in the lives of humans ?

Let's assume they want to do it, okay? Let's assume they actually want to take out 80% of humanity for their New World Order or whatever. Let's just assume that. As I said let’s assume they do want to do it for whatever reason, it’s easier that way.

And if they actually have the ways to do it, they could just:

1. Poison the water
2. Create a super virus and just create a cure for themselves

Could they actually spiritually do it or no ? Could they decide to just wipe out everyone in a way they can’t resist? I want to be specific on the fact that I am talking about a way where humanity can’t resist and undestand so not wars or manipulation or whatever.

Let’s assume they can totally really easily and they want it, would there be a spiritual reason on why they can’t do that ?

Let’s say people actually reincarnate, how does that actually even happen ? The only thing we seem to know are people remembering past events, however how does that actually work ? Do you wait or are you immediately transfered back ? And can anyone control it or is it totally random ?

Think about it, the furthest thing we know consciousness goes to are NDEs, the only thing we know is the closest to death is a dream.

So what if death was just the continuation of a dream made by the consciousness ? For this we would simply have to assume that consciousness is non physical, I personally believe it is non physical, as Lavoisier said energy cannot be destroyed nor created, this could also include consciousness.

Basically people compare death to sleep often times but when we sleep we do dream constantly (I think ?) so why wouldn’t the same thing happen in death if consciousness is non physical ?

However we would have to assume consciousness is non physical

I have a theory, what if in the afterlife the physical body is non existent but the consciousness survives and dreams another lfie. It seem to be coherent with the fact that NDEs are basically just that on a smaller scale, although they can be explained by the mind hallucinating and releasing DMT in moments of low oxygenation.

However a flaw in this theory is the fact that if this was the case we don’t truly know what was the beginning to this cycle of dreams.

I’ve been thinking about a simple but strange paradox. As artificial intimacy and AI partners become more advanced, is it possible for something uncanny or artificial to completely replace human reproduction?

The core question is:

Can an artificial system ever override the human drive to reproduce, or is that drive too deeply embedded in consciousness to be replaced?

By that I mean at a large societal scale where reproduction becomes fully controlled by the governement and where human reproduction becomes obsolete.

It might seem completely weird to some people but I wonder what you guys think of it, I believe the elites know deeply about what consciousness is and master it to reach their goals.

The elites seem to use collective consciousness to project their own goals unto the world, think about what rules the world for example, the US has power because of the dollar and if you look at dollar bills you could see a lot of symbolism perhaps engineered to collectively manifest a reality everytime people give power to this piece of paper. The illumanity symbol as a notorious example.

Masonic architecture is another example of this, an interesting info to know is that the Rothschilds have a personal psychic which could act as further proof of my theory.

So if we think about it, if everytime you wake up you don’t remember anything it would basically not be punishment and learning but just a never ending cycle.

It doesn’t make much sense to me from this view tho.

So explain exactly why purely scientifically you believe that consciousness does not stop at death and continues. For anybody that believes so, I would be really curious to see why purely from a non religious and unbiased view you believe that. Also tell us really clearly what you believe happens in the afterlife and why you believe that specifically.

An another aspect I want to add: Might seem a bit weird but according to the US army they found a lost pilot in Iran because of the electromagnetic field his body emitted, which shows that human consciousness is perhaps not only physical if we look at it from a scientific point of view

Neurologically what exactly do we know happens subconsciously when we feel physical attraction and could it be rewired by status cues or no ?

I see the argument that beauty standards change but if they change what is the exact subconscious process dictating physical attraction and can it truly change if beauty standards change ? It feels like everything around that field is highly theoretical and we can’t truly know everything for sure so I was wondering what we could know with certainty about consciousness in this case

Can wealth or status cues neurologically alter subconscious physical attraction or do they only influence conscious evaluation?

The historical claim is that being fat once signaled wealth, making it attractive.

But I want to separate being seen as a good mate choice from actually feeling immediate physical attraction these may be entirely different neurological processes.

Subcortical attraction signals fire at ~100-150ms, before prefrontal processing can apply any contextual knowledge like status or resource access. So did people in scarcity periods genuinely feel subconscious attraction to larger bodies, or did they simply reason that such bodies were desirable?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​