u/nosuchthingasakafir

I’m 19, didn’t go to uni for the record. I’m interested in doing an NCTJ course of course it would’ve helped if I went uni and then did my NCTJ on top but here we are

Is it worth the hassle for someone without a degree? Is it risky? What skills do you learn and is the full time fast track option better or the part time alternative?

Very passionate about journalism and it’s something I desperately want to get into, I just need a door to enter to get started even if it’s small.

Do they help you find work? Or do they expect you to freelance after you’ve got your qualification? I’ve heard some people online saying that the NCTJ course was overall better than their entire 3 year degree, but to me that sounds a bit too good to be true.

For those that have done it, what kind of connections can someone expect to make? And what kind of opportunities may someone be able to get both during and after completing the course?

I don’t mind doing it in Manchester or Cardiff. Preferably Manchester. Probably won’t be able to do it in London though realistically.

And finally is it worth doing it without a degree beforehand? I hope it won’t make too much of a difference.

Here is what most, not just Muslims but non Muslims (including ex Muslims) fail to realise

Perhaps some of you like to expose Islam because it’s humorous, I can fall into that category too
Perhaps some of you do it as a form of venting, I can fall into that category too

However, here is what’s most important about exposing Islam with the hopes of actually waking Muslims up

When people say not all Muslims are terrorists, that’s true. Of course it doesn’t change the fact that the core ideology promotes and calls for endless terror. Not all Muslims prostrate towards the black stone 5x a day whilst reciting a bunch of meaningless words in Arabic that were mostly plagiarised from the Talmud (aka salat / performing Islamic ‘prayer’), but that doesn’t mean that in Islam, it is not obligatory to do so. Not all Muslim women wear the hijab, not all Muslims skip lunch during the Islamic calendar of Ramadan, but that doesn’t change the fact that those things are Islamic, regardless of whether all Muslims engage in them, most, some, few, one or zero.

Here is where the average so called “moderate” Muslim stands, whether he realises it or not, and whether you realise it or not.

The average “moderate” Muslim, is nothing, but a disposable, discardable, worthless and insignificant pawn on the chess board of the jihadis (aka the “fundamentalist Muslims aka the “extreme” Muslims). The average Muslim is nothing but a blanket that keeps the terrorist warm. The average Muslim is nothing, but a number for them

So long as there are people who merely identify with the Muslim “faith” (it’s not a faith it’s a political ideology disguised as a religion so that the stupid ones (moderate Muslims) remain trapped in it thinking there’s an imaginary god all behind it), but so long as there are people in the world (being most Muslims) who merely identify as Muslims, that is all that matters.

Because a Muslim, regardless of how “extreme” or “moderate”, will always be loyal to Islam first, either consciously or subconsciously . It’s engrained so deeply in the culture and it stems out of several Islamic doctrines.

Mere identification with Islam = effectively guaranteed loyalty to the cause of Islam (irregardless of how “practising” they are or whether they’re even truly aware of the actual goals of Islam).

This is dangerous for obvious reasons. Because we know that Islam is bad, and there are millions of people who may be genuinely good people, don’t forget many of these people at the end of the day are still mothers of children and are fathers and are uncles and aunts etc, but all of these people are blindly loyal firstly and fore mostly to a BAD ideology before themselves even

Hypothetically if there were a nation with a growing Islamic population, as soon as the population figures of the mohammadans reach the majority, the “fundamentalists” wage a national jihad in an attempt to take over the nation, and they can easily do so not because they are necessarily competent, but because they are in the majority. Islam is a numbers game only. They’re not competent in any way in the modern world, their only competency are their numbers.

And this is how Islam spread and took over in many nations in the modern era, Iran, Lebanon, Indonesia to name a few.

In the medieval periods it was less deceptive and was more direct (I.e outright offensive violent jihad), but even historically in cases where that wasn’t possible (where the kuffar were a majority initially and were overall stronger, this gradual numbers game process of the Muslims was still a well used tactic, a great case being Spain especially during the 10-12th century era).

So long as the average Muslim is a Muslim, he’ll forever remain a member of the overall global Islamic plan as a stupid number on their system for their benefit, whether he realises it or not

I know the obvious answers “just start a YouTube channel, create stories and offer them to media outlets” etc

I get that. What I mean is, is that’s nice and all but you’re not actually gonna make a living out of it unless you’re either doing it professionally (degree most likely needed), or you somehow blow up and gain a large following

Any advice?

Yes islam contains a ton of myths, folklore, practises and plagiarisms from a bunch of other religions. But nothing in Islam is more influenced from the Talmud than anything else

Almost every chapter of the koran contains something Talmudic. It goes beyond stupid Mickey Mouse cartoon stories, there’s random ass quotes from Jewish rabbis essentially copy and pasted into the Koran. Everything about judgement day and hellfire is Talmudic. Everything about angles and jinns is Talmudic. “Alif laam meem” and all of these meaningless Arabic letters scattered throughout the koran that Muslims say “are miracles of Allah!” (lol) ARE FROM THE TALMUD.

Jewish rabbis would have these “Alif laam raa” codes in the Talmud to communicate with eachother in secret without anyone knowing what they’re talking about. In the koran of course it makes zero sense because it’s plagiarised, and it becomes obvious that mohamad was trying to lure the Jews into joining him so that when he would recite the koran in medina among the Jews and they would hear “alif laam meem xyz abc bla bla”, his hope was for them to be like “oh my how does this mohamad guy know about our secret coded language? Wow he really must be a true prophet as only allah could’ve told him!” (Little did the stupid mohamad know that this isn’t from the Torah, which is most likely what he would’ve thought, how embarrassing).

Many of the five pillars of Islam are taken from the Talmud with a little Islamic spin on them. These are all huge topics I can go into detail about but it isn’t the point here

But here’s what messed with my mind. It goes beyond just the koran and Hadiths that are heavily Talmudic. (If you’ve ever seen weird Hadiths of mohamad talking about silly superstitious nonsense like “oh if you eat 7 dates every day you’ll be protected from magic” or “oh if you yawn but don’t cover your mouth Satan enters your mouth and when you sneeze he comes out of you” are all Talmudic and taken from what the rabbis said. Mohamad’s obsession with odd numbers, Talmudic. Right being good left being bad allah having two right hands all of this is Talmudic (the rabbis said god has two arms and both of them are right lol)

But the crazy part is this. Tafsir is plagiarised from the Talmud as well. Especially tafsir ibn kathir, Ibn Abbas and jalalayn.

Literally random stuff that rabbis said in the Talmud are pretty much copy and pasted in tafsir ibn kathir for example, it’s so weird.

Just imagine if for example, let’s say a book came AFTER Islam claiming to be from god, let’s say Mormons and their book. Imagine you, as a Muslim/ ex Muslim, discover their book. And literally read not just things in your koran in their book, but you find bloody tafsir ibn kathir in their book AND NONE OF THEM KNOW IT AND ALL OF THEM BELIEVE THAT THEIR BOOK IS THE ETERNAL WORD OF THE GUY WHO CREATED THE UNIVERSE

Do you see how funny that is? Anyways even as an ex Muslim, it still shocked me when I discovered JUST HOW MUCH of the Talmud influences Islam. Not just Mohamad and his narrations and his koran, but the “ScHolArZ oF iSlam” as well.

In Aramaic, Al is a word that means “God.” It’s the same in ancient Hebrew, however Hebrew evolved and the Al sound became an El sound. The same goes for any other Hebrew/Aramaic word that has an “a” sound, in modern day Hebrew the “a” becomes an “e” sound. For example, in the Bible it says when a man and a woman get married, they become Akhad/ahad. Which in Aramaic means “one in unity”. In Hebrew this word ahad is pronounced “ekhad” - hence when the Jews recite the shema (it goes something like shema yisrael adonai bla bla something ekhad, which means “hear o israel, say your god is ekhad”

Old Testament prophets and messengers/angels keep this Al/El theme (Al in Aramaic/ancient Hebrew, El in modern day Hebrew). E.g. prophet JoEL, prophet DaniEL, prophet EzekiEL, RafaEL, angel GabriEL, ELijah, etc. in Aramaic these same names would just be pronounced as “GabriAL, EzekiAL)

In the semetic languages, AL or EL is a word that means god. Hence how all of those names translate to something like “servant of El (god), the spirit of El (god), etc)

Now, Arabic stems from Aramaic, so it maintained the AL sound. In modern day Arabic, yes al just means “the”, so the name of allah in Arabic is actually a very stupid name because what kind of a god’s name is “the god” (al lah) but that’s beside the point.

Allah’s name in Arabic just means “the god” (how stupid). In Aramaic, however, his name translate to “God Lah” (Al-Lah).

If you open up the stupid koran in chapter 53 verses 19-22 around that area, mohamad in the koran talks about the three daughters of al-lah. “Have they not observed Al Lat, Al uzza and Manat?” Bla bla bla (koran surah 53)

Al Lat meaning god lat
Al uzza meaning god uzza

These are the famous “satanic verses” of the Koran. Not that the devil actually influenced Allah’s revelation, because those Mickey Mouse cartoon concepts are obviously not real, but those are the verses of the story where “Mohamad was sad that the people of Mecca were not believing in him, so he asked allah for some help, and allah revealed some pagan verses to allah the three daughters of allah to be worshipped temporarily to act as birds to deliver the worship in the skies up to allah”

“But oops no allah didn’t actually reveal that, Satan hijacked the revelation and tricked mohamad! Later on angel JibreEL came and fixed the revelation and those words were removed from Allah’s eternally written koran! Hooray Wahamdoolala!”

(The whole satanic verses incident is quoted throughout the tafsir’s of those ayahs there’s YouTube videos all about it in detail anyways that isn’t the point here)

So anyways, in 7th century Arabia, AL was a word that was used to refer to god (and then the name of the god was stated)

This is just a quick side point, but this is how I think and I think other Muslims would wake up if they thought like me. Isn’t is strange how the alleged eternally existing god who created the universe’s name is allah, who’s name just so coincidentally happens to sound pretty damn similar to a 7th century Arabian pagan goddess (Al Lat) during the time of mohamad, and allah just predestined (as allah predestined everything in the bullshit mythology of Islam), allah just so happened to predestine that during the time he decided to reveal his 124,000th prophet (after failing 123,999 times…that he predestined would happen lol), that there would be a pagan god who’s name would sound almost identical to his, which would make allah obviously seem like a huge fraud and make it sound like he is just a name of a god of his time, when really he isn’t as he is the true eternal god?

Do you see how clumsy allah is? If you actually believe in him? This alone is more than enough of a reason to know that Islam is so obviously false, ‘truly those of you who have intellect will understand’ (see I can talk like allah in the koran too!)

Anyways back to my point. So Al (god) Lah.
Who is Lah? Lah is the god in charge of the moon. The non god Lah or the moon god Sin perhaps you’ve heard of him.

Not the actual moon. The god in charge of the moon. Before Islam existed, there was a god in charge of the moon (Al-Lah) and a god in charge of the sun (the sun god Ra). The moon is a male and the sun is a female. The moon good and the sun god had sex and they conceived the three daughters of Allah.

Hence why the black stone looks like a vagina. This isn’t a coincidence. It’s the goddess of fertility. In mohamad’s time, pagan Arab women when they would want to have a baby, but would have their period (meaning they aren’t pregnant) would put their fingers (down there) and wipe their blood on the black stone as like a middle finger or a fuck you to the pagan gods above “fuck you Al-Lah, I wanted to get pregnant but I know I’m not now as I just had my period yesterday so take this!” As she wipes her blood off of her fingers onto the black stone (the one that mohammadans kiss today).

This is true, look it all up. And of course the filthy mohamad was kissing that very same black stone

This is why for example after the battle of uhud (625ad) where mohamad ran away like a coward saying “who will give his life for me? Who will sacrifice his life for me?” When a rock got thrown at his face by I believe khalid ibn walid and mohamad panicked, and the quraysh were laughing at and mocking the coward mohamad, abu bakr said to the quraysh “go and suck on the clitors of al-lat”

The clitorus of al lat is the black stone. He told them this because the pagan Arabs used to kiss the black stone. Which during that period of Islam (625ad), the Muslims didn’t do so (not that they could anyways even if they wanted to as they were living in medina and they were enemies with the Meccans). After 630 (the conquest of mecca), mohamad kissed the black stone anyways, or in other words, “kissed the clitorus of al-lat”. Hence the famous Hadith in Bukhari of umar saying “oh had I not see the messenger of allah kiss the black stone, by allah I wouldn’t have done it” - signifying that even they knew it was pagan (and of pagan origin) but they’re only doing it as they saw mohamad doing it (Islam is a cult), make sense?

Al-lah , the moon god. This is why the Koran says in a stupid verse “it is not permissible for the sun to overtake the moon” but the koran doesn’t say it the other way round. Why? They’re competing with the sun god. The moon is better. This is why it’s haram in Islam to worship allah (by bending over for the kabah) during fajr till dhur (from sunrise to noon), because during this entire time sun god worshippers are worshipping the sun, get it? This is why in the stupid koran it says the sun sets in a pool of boiling hot water (hamiyah in Arabic). Does the moon set anywhere? No, the moon is superior. The stupid sun sets in a pool of murky water tho because the sun is stupid. This is why mohamad said in that famous Hadith in relation to this that when the sun sets in a pool of hot water, it bows down and prostrates to allah (being the moon god) and asks permission (from allah the moon god) to rise again. Does the moon (allah) need permission from the sun to rise? No! Mohamad is competing against the sun mfs. The mohammadans are the moon guys, get it?

This is why fasting in Ramadan is all about the moon. Not the sun. And all of this moon god influence comes from the sabians, who worshipped the moon god al-lah (who also fasted in the same way as Muslims did 1000 years prior to Islam originally, including calling their festival after the 30 days ‘al fitr’, research it if you’re really interested). The early Muslims were even accused of being sabians as found in the Hadiths. The Islamic sources as so self sabotaging in the modern day. Even the stupid Koran in surah 2 says “indeed Jews and Christian’s as sabians and Muslims will enter paradise”. Sabians are pagans, why is mohamad mentioning them?

Also, in Arabic it says sabieen, which if you can read Arabic and are an Arab is very stupid and makes no sense grammatically. The koran is full of stupid grammatical errors anyway. There is no such thing as “as sabieen” as the koran says, but we know what mohamad in his grammatically incorrect Arabic means, he’s talking about the sabians.

So finally who is allah? Allah is the god in charge of the moon. Allah is the moon god. Akbar is the sun god. Akbar is a word that means “bigger” yes. It’s the name of the sun god also (probably because the sun is “bigger” (akbar) than the moon lol). Allah hu Akbar is not only a political statement that means “allah is greater!!!!” That is said during terrorist attacks (which go back to mohamad as mohamad would chant alla akbar when invading infidels), allah hu akbar also means “allah and akbar” aka “the moon god and the sun god” but that’s a whole different topic

These aren’t arguments to make a Muslim leave Islam, Muslims wouldn’t understand this stuff, especially the silly non Arab ones, there’s different arguments to use with Muslims to get them to leave Islam. This is for those who already know Islam is false, and seeing these things (I’ve mentioned) becomes pretty clear

Are (or ex Jews) aware of just how much of Islam is essentially copy and pasted from the Talmud? Not the Torah, the Talmud. Almost every chapter in the koran contains something Talmudic. And it goes beyond just mere fairytale stories, random quotes of ancient Jewish rabbis in the talmud are in cooperated into the koran, the specific names and terms that those Jewish rabbis would use to describe god in Hebrew are also incorporated into the koran, and I believe a Talmudic concept of Hebrew letters that make up some kind of a code are also found in the koran, everything about koranic judgement day, hellfire, “jinns” (imaginary ghosts in Islam), embryology, cosmology, the five pillars, literally everything has a very deep Talmudic influence to it

And then it gets even more strange as it isn’t just the koran alone that’s so heavily plagiarised from the Talmud. It goes even further beyond the koran. All of Islamic literature is heavily influenced by the Talmud. The companions of mohamad plagiarise from the Talmud, many Hadiths of Mohamad talking are of him speaking of Talmudic concepts. For example I’ve seen ex Jews on this sub in the past talk about how the Talmud contains Jewish rabbis believing in crazy superstitious myths things like for example “oh if you sleep on your left shoulder the devil will lean on your right shoulder and bite you” or whatever strange stuff like that that you’ll find these Jewish rabbis talking about in the Talmud are also found all throughout the Hadiths.

And then finally it gets even more strange when you realise that commentaries of the koran by medieval Islamic clerics and “scholars” are also heavily influenced by the Talmud. We call it “tafsir”, which basically means exegete or interpretation (of the Koran). The same way you have the Torah and the Talmud, is the same way Muslims have the koran and the tafsir.

And tafsir (commentaries of the koran by Muslim clerics)….are also using the Talmud to explain the koran

It’s so weird and I wonder how many Jews or ex Jews especially are actually even aware of this and if they are, how it makes them feel? There’s 2 billion people in this world who, what you guys consider to be the meaningless words of some crazy rabbi 2000 years ago, two billion people out there actually believe that those are the eternally written words of the guy who created the universe lol (and none of them know it).

This isn’t hateful by the way in case any mods see the title and assume I’m being racist. Since you guys are ex Muslims, I would have imagined you may have at least read the sirah (biography) of moohoomood (salalahu bla bla bla). All it takes in a lot of cases is for the average Muslim to pick up a sirah, read about mohamad’s life, and he’ll find himself really struggling to believe in islam if he has even half a brain (like a hijabi woman hahahaha, sahih Bukhari 2658)

Anyways, I don’t see a lot of people ever bringing this up. Maybe they haven’t read it or maybe they have but they skimmed over it. Or maybe they didn’t see it as problematic.

Off of the top of my head idk maybe around a little past page 100 or so of the sirah of ibn ishaq, after a meeting with mohamad, his uncle Abu talib and the quryashi nobles (regarding mohamad’s intolerant and abusive behaviour and attitude towards them in Mecca), Mohamad says to his uncle something along the lines of

“oh I just wish for them to say la ila ha ilala (bla bla) for us Arabs can unite and conquer the non Arabs and have mastery over them”

Change the words “Arab” and “non arab” to “white European” and “non whites” and notice how you’re brain will all of a suddenly function properly and how you’ll find yourself getting angry or upset at that. What’s the difference?

The idea of Nigerian Muslims existing or banglastani or Indonesian Muslims ever existing never crossed the mind of mohamad I don’t think. The goal isn’t for every human on earth to necessarily convert to islam, it’s just for shariah to dominate the globe (which will never happen in our modern times anyway). Where Muslims (Arabs) are like a “chosen people” with far greater privileges than the non Muslims / non Arabs / “kuffar and mushrikeen” lol

In fact speaking of those ethnicities there’s multiple Hadiths of mohamad talking about East Asians as having weird faces and flat eyes or something like that you can look em up for yourself, and I don’t need to get started on what mohamad and all the early Muslims said about the black African races.

But anyways, early Muslims also said the same thing. I can’t be bothered to find all the narrations now but many mozlamic scholars stated the supremacy of Arabs over the non Arab bakistanis and how allah favoured the Arabs (there’s many Hadiths of mohamad saying oh allah favoured me from the best of peoples from the best of tribes bla bla bla bla)

There is a degree of ethno imperialism with the spread of islam. As the Turks kind of did the same thing and embraced a “Turkish supremacy” type of culture themselves.

Anyways I find the silly non Arab mohammadans to be the most cringe. None of them speak Arabic. None of them know why they’re even Muslims in the first place (spoiler alert it’s because at some point in history more or less their ancestors were victims of jihad, no different to non Muslims being persecuted today), none of them truly understand their own crappy inherited religion as none of them speak Arabic. Many of them dress like Arabs and change their accent to talk like Arabs, especially here in the uk. It’s so weird and silly. Arabizing yourself (if that’s even a word lol) has nothing to do with worshipping or pleasing the guy who created the universe. It’s so stupid and so cringe.

None of them have a clue what they’re even reciting when they’re bending over for the black rock in Mecca. Half of the time these non Arab hijabi women are reciting verses of the Koran that talk about the private parts of the huris in mozlamic paradise during their “prayer” and they have LITERALLY NO CLUE AT ALL because they don’t speak Arabic. They probably think they’re reciting these magical Arabic verses that talk about the universe or some bs hahahahaha how silly and deluded.

The Arabs laugh at the silly Indian boys. I personally call them hindu mohammadans.

When one of the “eNeMiEs oF iSLam grrrrr🤬” comes out with such ignorant statements such as “Mohamad said in the Koran xyz” or “Mohamad wrote the Koran”, I see moslems getting really angry and try “correcting them” saying “NOOOO THE KOORAN IS THE WORD OF ALA NOT MOHOMOD (salalahu bla bla) omg🤬🤬🤬”

What you should say in response to these silly Mohammadans is the following.

The koran is a book authored by Mohamed until proven otherwise. Just because the koran says it’s from god doesn’t actually mean it comes from god, silly. That’s what we call a ‘false dichotomy’. People who live in the real world understand this. However moslems, in their ignorance and delusion fail to grasp this which is understandable.

It goes like this: “the stupid koran are the words of mohamad until YOU (I.e the mohammadan) can prove otherwise (I.e prove that the koran is actually the eternally preserved word of the guy who created the universe lol)”

Flip it on em. The burden of proof is upon THEM, not YOU.

The same goes for anything else.

It’s: “mohammadans, when bowing down towards a black rock in Mecca whilst reciting a bunch of meaningless words in Arabic that were mostly plagiarised from the Talmud…are literally just bowing down towards a silly blacks stone whilst reciting a bunch of meaningless words in Arabic plagarised from the Talmud UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE. Until the mohammadan can prove to YOU that no actually this dirty filthy black stone is actually the direction where the guy who created the universe instructed us to prostrate towards while we supposedly worship him lol

I see a lot of non Muslims falling for these silly traps. They’re slow and sloppy. Always remember that the burden of proof is always upon the claimant so flip it on them

It isn’t “hey kafir why is islam false then huh?”

It’s: “hey abdool. Why is the filthy cult of mohammadanism the truth? You’re the one making the claim, not me, so prove it silly?”

Which they never can as Islam is not true in the real world

Looking for some new ex mozlom friends lol

In the amazing koran, allah (sobhono who? wotaholo) says: “Your women are a tillage for you, so approach your tillage as you please!” (2:223)

The context for this (as found in sunan abu dawud 2164, where that Hadith is referenced in the commentaries of that verse) is that it is well known that Jews only do it in one position. Some of the Arabs (the Medinan helpers) copied the Jews whilst some (the kooraysh) were more wild and did it however they wanted to. They asked mohomod about what positions they were allowed to do with their Muslim wives (aka their tilth’s) and allah the most amazing god for men ever revealed the following verse. Muslim women are a tilth for her Muslim man. Muslim women are a tillage made to be cultivated as the koran and tafsirs of that ayah say wahamdoolalal!

“The people of the Book (i.e. the Jews) used to have intercourse with their women on one side alone (i.e. lying on their backs). This was the most concealing position for (the vagina of) the women. This clan of the Ansar adopted this practice from them. But this tribe of the Quraysh used to uncover their women completely, and seek pleasure with them from in front and behind and laying them on their backs.

So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur'anic verse: "Your wives are a tilth to you, so come to your tilth however you will," i.e. from in front, from behind or lying on the back. But this verse meant the place of the delivery of the child, I.e the vagina” (Sunan abu Dawud 2164)

I’m surprised that this isn’t a widely discussed topic as it’s a very easy examination to make, even if you speak basic Arabic. Now allow me to explain.

In Arabic, the spelling of some imposter guy called isa (who’s mother is also the sister of Aaron and daughter of imran, lol stupid mohomot. By the way in aramaic his name is amram, mohamad got confused and pronounced the m as an n, anyways that’s not the point here).

The spelling of isa is this: “عيسى” (ayn, yaa, sin, yaa).

However in Hebrew/Aramaic his name is “yeshuaa”

And in arabic, among Christian’s pre Islam, during Islam, and today, his name is pronounced “yasuu”, not isa lol.

Any Arab or Middle Eastern Christian can confirm this. You can hear the original aramaic root too (yeshuaa in aramaic to yasuu in Arabic). If you’ve ever heard of or even seen the tragic ISIS video of the 21 martyrs, you’ll hear one of the Christian’s just before being beheaded saying “ya rabb yasuu” (oh lord jesus) as his final words.

Ya rabb yasuu. Not ya rabb isa.

Now anyways, if you take the name and spelling of yasuu and say it backwards, you literally get isa.

Yasuu = “يسوع”

Isa = “‎عيسى”

Since this is an ex Muslim sub Reddit I would expect the vast majority of you to at least be able to read basic Arabic. So if you see it, you can see it.

It becomes obvious that the author of the koran is saying the name of Jesus backwards. In Hebrew/Aramaic yeshuaa, in Arabic yasuu, in English Jesus. And among mohammadans, “isa”.

However despite this being shockingly easy to discover and notice, don’t just take my word for it. Even the “ScHoLars of IsLam hehe” have admitted this.

Koran 2:87 says some bs about some guy called isa ibn mariam. If we open up tafsir Ibn Ashur (of that ayah, 2:87), it is stated:

وعيسى اسم معرب من يشوع أو يسوع وهو اسم عيسى ابن

مريم قلبوه في تعريبه قلباً مكانياً

Translation: "And Isa is the Arabized Name of Yeshu' or Yeshoo' and it's the Name of Isa, the son of Maryam and they read the Name backwards.” He then goes on to give his theory being that mohomot in his qureyshi dialect was unable to pronounce yasuu so to make it easier for him Allah revealed it as “isa” to him lol but I don’t think that is true.

You can check the tafsir for yourself on al tafsir dot com, but it’s only in Arabic (they never translate this stuff into English).

This in and of itself is proof alone that the cult of mohammadanism is the anti christ religion, where its majority non Arab deluded followers literally say the name of Jesus in Arabic backwards. What a mad stupid religion jajajajajajaj