u/blackmamba4554

https://x.com/including_women

When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".

Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.

Is it because of patriachy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?

And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?

https://x.com/including_women

When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".

Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.

Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?

And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?

https://x.com/including_women

When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".

Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.

Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?

And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?

https://x.com/including_women

When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".

Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.

Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?

And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?

https://x.com/including_women

When I came across this page, I was really shocked that there were so many examples of this sexist phrase. It is not "still" at all. It is "nothing has changed since Titanic".

Are male lives less valuable? if so, men are oppressed. Nothing matters than live.

Is it because of patriarchy? So why is the progressive BBC promoting patriarchy?

And why don't all the gender equality advocates criticize BBC and other media for this?

ILGA Europe have not included surrogacy in its annual reports but have included artificial insemination.

That is, biological parenthood doesn't matter for gays, but it does for lesbians.

Surrogacy must be addressed as an LGBTQ issue. And opposition to surrogacy is a form of homophobia. Lack of this is one of the main reasons why things are so bad with surrogacy in Europe. It is highly unlikely that they are unaware that today surrogacy is perhaps the only way to build families. As gay couples across Europe report that adoptions have become extremely difficult, if not impossible.

Why such disregard for us? Why on Earth is Spain dark green? For torturing gay families?

Gay men have completely lost their identity. And bi men are never taken seriously at all in the mainstream LGBTQ organizations. It is we who must determine our rights and not allow others to impose them on us.

Plus, servility to anyone who calls themselves a feminist, even if they cause a colossal damage. That's why ILGA Europe is afraid to include surrogacy as it could cost them politically, but isn't afraid of losing G and B(m) at all. Or simply don't want to do it in spite of the obvious demand for it. and instead of protesting, gays write on forums "They made surrogacy more difficult. I cried all night." And also upvote biased reports like that. Or repost it. Of course, it's about LGBTQ people.

Why is there such disregard for our most important issues in these LGBTQ organizations. Gay couples can't create families. What could be more important? Could this be changed? Or is everyone content with this grim situation?!