u/TeddieSnow

HAROLD AND MAUDE (1971)

HAROLD AND MAUDE (1971)

In my sixth decade, my favorite film ever is BEING THERE directed by Hal Ashby. But I forgot Ashby directed HAROLD AND MAUDE, and after 6 decades I decided to view it a 2nd time.

It's a chill masterpiece, people. There's no point in saying you should see this classic because you must see this classic. Not as a slick and pro as BEING THERE, but it works just fine.

During the time between viewings I wrote some plays and a lot of screenplays. So I'm picky, okay? I only saw two things I wanted tweaked, one tiny and one big. The second one is a spoiler and so if you haven't see this nutty film see it first before reading.

The tiny one is captured in the picture above. When Maude steals the cop's bike and she says, "Get the shovel!", that's historic cinematic perfection. But I want to add to it. I hoped the cop took a shot at them, hit the shovel, Harold doesn't drop the shovel but reacts in shock -- and Maude calmly says, "He's a helluva good shot."

The big one is spoiler territory, but here we go.

In screenwriting terms, there's a giant plant in this story that never paid off: the tattoo'd number on Maude's arm, indicating she was a Jew in a Nazi concentration camp. I had totally forgotten this and it shocked me as much as Harold. But they never discuss it.

Another related screenwriting best practice is "Don't put a gun on the stage if you're not going to use it." That probably goes back to theater.

What I saw was an opportunity to alter Maude's demise. In the story she takes pills to end her life because she's reached her 80th birthday. As if she had a pact with herself.

I think it's upsetting to the audience because her newfound friend and lover might be worth staying with a little longer, right? Art house film critics could argue that she was never going to feel any happier and so why not go out on top? Sure, but it still came off as a little cruel to Harold just the same.

If we wanted to keep the 'go out on top' thing, there would be a moment where Maude would have a heart attack. Maybe after getting off a carnival carousel. Or maybe simply at a lovely sunset. Either way I'd have Harold panic and say, "What's wrong?!?" and Maude would say, "Nothing dear. We're two of a kind. I died in Auschwitz 29 years ago darling..." and she dies in his arms.

Why?

Well when he drives like a maniac? Off that cliff? And impossibly survives it? I'd have made Maude JUST like him. Able to avoid death too. And she'd be up there with him and his banjo.

A happier ending, yes, but it would have explained the tattoo and why the two of them were ghouls of a feather.

I don't need anyone to agree, but I just had to share.

u/TeddieSnow — 10 hours ago
▲ 6 r/CDrama

Can't resist Tiffany Tang talking with her mouth full

I know she's legend, but this is our first exposure to Tiffany. (This is a clip from the Criterion version of BLOSSOMS SHANGHAI.)

u/TeddieSnow — 4 days ago

This one came to me in a dream and it woke me up

In my dream I was with a middle aged women who was once my neighbor in a different town.

She said, "Teddie, you have to understand: they pick what clothes I wear, pick what TV shows I watch, and pick what food I eat."

I thought for a moment and then said, "At least you get to pick your nose..." and actually woke up with a little laugh.

reddit.com
u/TeddieSnow — 5 days ago
▲ 7 r/Yelp

A way to stop Yelp's annoying DID YOU TRY (THAT PLACE) notifications?

I don't like being punished for looking up places.

reddit.com
u/TeddieSnow — 7 days ago
▲ 1 r/Yelp

When I'm on a PC, I don't like Yelp Sort. I prefer MOST RECENT reviews -- but now it's locked on YELP SORT in Firefox. On Brave -- the buttons are greyed out.

UPDATE --

I fixed it, but it's one weird bug. See this image --

https://postimg.cc/s1yyNGxF

You can see the greyed out buttons. But you can also see '11 reviews mentioning 'burgers'. I don't remember even looking for burgers, but that message appeared on ANY review I looked at.

I clicked CLEAR RESULTS and got YELP SORT and FILTER BY RATING back

So -- thanks to those who tried to help, but do me a small favor.

  1. Go to Yelp logged in as you
  2. Select your town and then search for a catagory of food (like "Italian food" or 'burgers")
  3. Clich the first result
  4. Scroll down to the YELP SORT and FILTER BY RATING buttons
  5. Are they greyed out?
u/TeddieSnow — 9 days ago

UPDATE -- After posting this, the ABC article was changed. I'm presuming one of the campaigns called. It now says Hilton is ahead and reflects a more recent survey. But they do not admit they edited the article, and so I'm lucky to have done the screencaps I did. Pathetic journalism!!!

Original post --

We Democrats and non-MAGA types are trying to navigate this tricky Governor's race.

Everyone knows we need a Blue hopeful to pull ahead in the polls so we can award all our votes to that individual and definitely have a contender in November. That is: we're all on edge about the vote being split and not having a boat in the race at all.

Everyone knows this, including the corporate media that's trying to tip the scale. I just found a painful example of this here --

https://www.10news.com/americavotes/new-poll-shows-early-leader-in-california-governors-race-as-key-issues-take-center-stage

Glance at this story, and you soon see this --

Hmm...

This story is from today. Since I was seeking recent polling data, it came up in my feed. It says Steyer is currently leading.

Now we all live busy lives and there's no need to really read much more of this piece, but I was like... wait a minute... I had the impression Becerra was ahead.

(FULL DISCLOSURE -- I'm equally interested in Becerra, Porter, and Steyer. Whoever rises to the top I'll vote for.)

So I clicked that 'recent' survey and got this incredibly densely formatted 'survey' --

Where are my glasses?!?

-- and I think most people would be like, "I don't have the time to read this!" For the TL:DRooler voters, guaranteed they won't read it.

But if you do, you discover this in the fine print --

Excuse me?!?

That's not recent. That's a month ago. When Swalwell was still in the race! All polling has reported Becerra's rise since Eric's departure.

But if you go back to that ABC story, no mention of Becerra. Or any other candidate for that matter. The entire point of the piece was to imply 'Steyer for the Win!'.

So why mislead? Was this an 'ad' paid for by Steyer, or do corporate interests want Steyer? I don't mean to diss him because the endorsements he has aren't meaningless -- but who or what decided to post this ridiculous story?

https://preview.redd.it/0fmuhqnbz5zg1.jpg?width=667&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6cf686b183834400fb182c4a8fac37fbfe611383

reddit.com
u/TeddieSnow — 10 days ago