Alas, it's not the mouse itself in the box. I was amazed Google reverse image search found nothing! I found one or two similar era boxes, but I can't find this one. Curious about any info!
A few months ago when I finally used an agent inside an IDE for the first time, I would diligently review and try to understand every line it wrote. If it wrote something I didn't understand, I'd research it. I told myself I would keep doing this.
Now I give it a scan to see if anything jumps out at me, but I've stopped doing that on the files it doesn't change very much.
I didn't want it to be like this, but it feels....ok?
note - none of the code I'm writing is for high stakes production environments. I have a website and a couple tools we use internally at work.
I hadn't spent much time analyzing the different ai providers billed offerings yet, as I'd managed to get everything I needed by switching between all the free providers, but I just got copilot pro yesterday.
From what I can tell, you're incentivized to generate the largest, most complex, multi-step refractor request you possibly can, as you're only getting billed one request for it.
Am I missing something? Are there background token limits that are going to catch up with me if I always use it like that?
I've seen constant posts from people with both Claude Code and Codex subscriptions complaining about rate limits. Has Microsoft just not stopped the hand-outs yet, or what's the deal?
I'd love to hear other conclusions people have come to.
Feels like a good value? Especially considering how many different steps it took.
I used Haiku 4.5 to generate the plan ($0.01) and 5.3-codex to execute ($0.03).
$0.04 representing 0.4% of pro request allowance at $10.00/month.
I finally bit the bullet and started the pro free-trial yesterday, as I'd exhausted every free allowance on every account on every provider I had, and it was only the 5th day of the month.