
u/Nerd-19958

10,000 rulings: The courts’ overwhelming rebuke of Trump’s ICE policies
According to the linked article, Federal courts have ruled against ICE in approximately 90% of detention cases in connection with Trump's mass deportation agenda. Not surprisingly, ICE and its xenophobic followers attribute this to activist judges, radical left-wing lunatics, and the usual catchphrases.
However, the extent of rulings against ICE are telling: out of 11,600 court decisions, 10,200 went against ICE. According to the article, Politico has released the full database of those rulings.
Federal gas tax holiday sees growing support amid pain at the pump
rollcall.comTrump rejects traditional conservatism, embraces a Republican version of socialism
When the Federal government demands 10% ownership of a company in return for a bailout, and approves another company's foreign merger only in return for veto power over the merged company's major decisions -- anyone who does not recognize that as socialism is blinded by the orange fool's fake tan glow.
I am very thankful that Spirit Airlines did not agree to a similar Trumpist takeover; had they done so, Don the Con definitely would have had his chubby diseased hands in the till. Considering Trump's war of choice on Iran and resulting skyrocketing jet fuel prices definitely put the final nail in Spirit's coffin, that would have been a decidedly corrupt look (even considering the source).
NAACP files emergency petition to block Tennessee’s newly approved redistricting plan
thehill.comMediacom using customers' leased equipment for their own Wi-Fi network
Section 8.2.2.1 of Mediacom's updated service agreement states that, for customers who use Mediacom's routers / gateways, that equipment [which the customer pays to lease] is also used to broadcast Mediacom's Wi-Fi network for their cell customers (Mediacom Mobile Service) as well as the customer's own home Wi-Fi. (Mediacom cell phones default to using Wi-Fi where available rather than cell networks.)
I don't know if this is standard practice among cell service providers. It seems to me that if a customer pays to lease equipment and pays for Mediacom Wi-Fi at a specified bandwidth, that if Mediacom is also using that equipment to service their cell customers, the home customer's bandwidth might be negatively affected.
In any event, in the same section noted above, a phone number is provided for home customers to inform Mediacom that they do not want their leased equipment used to also broadcast Mediacom's Mobile Service Wi-Fi network.
Does Xfinity use customers leased equipment for its own network?
Three years ago we moved to a small development where Mediacom is the only provider. Mediacom recently sent an updated service agreement which stated (among other things) that if a customer rents their Wi-Fi equipment from Mediacom, Mediacom will use that equipment to provide service to Mediacom's Wi-Fi network (Mediacom Mobile, for cell phone customers) as well as the home customer's Wi-Fi. Mediacom's cell phone network defaults to Wi-Fi where available.
In other words, Mediacom is charging home Wi-Fi customers to rent equipment, which Mediacom also uses to extend its own Wi-Fi network.
I am posting this here to ask if Comcast / Xfinity does the same? We were Comcast / Xfinity customers for 20+ years at our previous home, but unfortunately only Mediacom is available in our small community.
UnitedHealthcare to remove prior authorization for 30% of services
United Healthcare, the nation's largest private health insurer covering more than 50 million patients, recently announced that it will drop prior authorization (PA) for some services. These include some outpatient operations, diagnostic tests such as echocardiograms, outpatient therapies, and chiropractic care by the end of 2026.
The linked article reports that according to an AMA survey, 93% of physicians reported that PA delayed care for patients.
FDA is proposing to add several unapproved peptides to their "503A Bulks List" which permits individual compounding of listed compounds pursuant to a physician's prescription. These will be discussed at a meeting of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee on July 23 and 24, 2026. This information is noteworthy because Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a strong proponent of the use of such compounds.
The individual peptides to be discussed each day are listed below.
July 23
| Bulk drug substance | Uses evaluated |
|---|---|
| BPC-157 (free base), BPC-157 acetate | Ulcerative colitis (UC). |
| KPV (free base), KPV acetate | Wound healing and inflammatory conditions. |
| TB-500 (free base), TB-500 acetate | Wound healing. |
| MOTs-C (free base), MOTs-C acetate | Obesity and osteoporosis. |
July 24:
| Bulk drug substance | Uses evaluated |
|---|---|
| Emideltide (free base), Emideltide acetate | Opioid withdrawal, chronic insomnia, and narcolepsy. |
| Semax (free base), Semax acetate | Cerebral ischemia, migraine, and trigeminal neuralgia. |
| Epitalon (free base), Epitalon acetate | Insomnia. |
Recent post from SCOTUSblog indicates that the Court is likely to rule in favor of generic drug manufacturer Hikma in litigation brought by branded marketer Amarin, in which Amarin claimed Hikma induced infringement of Amarin's patent(s) covering one indication for their product Vascepa® although Hikma's labeling carved out the patented indication. Amarin's claim is that Hikma's public statements that their product is a generic equivalent to Vascepa® constitute induced infringement.