u/Glad-Western5346

Do you know latent gays and closeted gays?

I live in Russia. There are plenty of closeted gays here. My friend has a wife and kids, and he flaunts his muscularity and religious beliefs. Even though he's gay, his friends and family don't know it.

It's typical to have sex with a guy, have a hot night, and the next morning he calmly admits he's heterosexual and just enjoys dick occasionally. Then it might turn out he's in the riot police and breaks up LGBT and anti-war rallies.

But I didn't create this post to whine about gays in third-world countries. It's because I've started meeting people who simply don't believe in closeted gays. They think that if a 30-year-old man turns out to be gay, it means he was straight before, and then somehow became gay.

Or, for example: we're sitting at a bar playing quizzes. Our team includes two closeted gays, me (I'm openly bi, but I don't say it every time I greet someone), and a married couple. Suddenly, the married couple starts discussing how there are no gays in our city, because they've never seen one. It's a random conversation.

And I'm just sitting there in shock.

It must be acknowledged that even in Russia there are openly gay people. And Western media actively portrays queer culture in its films and TV series. And I have a feeling it's not just that I live in a wild country. It's that people are used to seeing openly gay people, rainbow-colored, affected, feminine... And in their mindset, if someone suddenly realizes they're gay as a teenager, they don't continue to live their life as a normal guy. They join a gay scene and live their life as an openly gay person.

And I thought that in the US, gays essentially live like that. And it's probably strange to them that someone might not even realize they're gay—even if their penis gets hard for men (i.e., it's latent).
Or that a gay man can be closeted, live with a woman, go to church, vote Republican, and be a conservative. Simply because he thinks it's the norm.

reddit.com
u/Glad-Western5346 — 23 hours ago

The future of the "Nazi" party! (lol)

Not a bad title for a post in 2026?

My jokin playthrough as a nationalist and a Nazi left so many unsaid thoughts about the future Party of Norvik! What do you think the future holds for them?

I call on all law-abiding evil assholes from the only true party to express their opinion.

A brief summary of what happened, as I see it (let's call it "my struggle"):

>!1) It's clear that the old party leadership, the magistrate, has betrayed everyone. And the party as an ideology has been practically destroyed. Reputation destroyed. But the officials, guards, and, of course, the clergy can't vanish into thin air. They retain some influence and authority. !<

>!2) The Freestriders will apparently begin to simply rape the city economically. Owning the ports is no joke. The city is effectively becoming a colony of the Reeds. So many city residents will be against them. Yes, yes. Decolonization advocates are also a form of nationalism.!<

>!3)The Azgalians seem like the city's hope. But I think they have internal contradictions. The city faces endless arguments between foremen about ideology. Small-time capitalists will likely be less than thrilled with the idea of ​​abolishing private property. Overall, I think they'll have their share of opponents among the population.!<

>!4)Arcanists. By the end of the game, it turns out there are quite a few of them in the city. Two liches, Rubrick Prax... They have ambitions. But the Magocracy has clearly earned a worse reputation than even the Fascists, and the people don't like them. I think if they decide not to start from scratch but join and lead one of the parties, nationalism is the only thing that won't make them sick (aside from the Agrarian Party). The Freestrider's literally overthrew them, and the Azgal are too egalitarian.!<

So I think a nationalist underground is emerging. Certainly weaker than other parties, but still quite active.

https://preview.redd.it/qowfk0hvdk0h1.jpg?width=723&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=19f88d29ae0dc2504a893f488f1735f81d986da5

reddit.com
u/Glad-Western5346 — 3 days ago

I'm also talking about the LGBT community. And many gay prudes stubbornly condemn sex for sex's sake as something bad and "immoral."

I think feminism, which is mistakenly considered a friend of LGBT, plays a big role in this.

I'm convinced that biologically, by nature, I'm lustful. And all the judgments about this come only from societal norms.

But even other gays write that this is supposedly toxic muscularity, and that what I really want is to start a gay family, adopt children, and lead a pseudo-heterosexual life with a guy. And it's only society that makes me want to be a club prostitute.

Literally just now, I was talking to a gay man who was wondering, "How can we save gays from promiscuity?" People want to save me from this.

Which of these desires do you think are imposed by society, and which are genuine, natural?

reddit.com
u/Glad-Western5346 — 14 days ago