https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.09.10.25335404v1

taken from article : https://www.earth.com/news/scientists-invent-plant-based-serum-shown-in-lab-tests-to-regrow-hair-in-weeks/

The Failure of Human Jurisprudence

• The Quran: While critical, scholars themselves admit it is "incomplete" for practical details like prayer methods without external guidance.
• Consensus & Reasoning: These are dismissed as fallible human inventions. Consensus is rarely reached , and human logic cannot substitute for higher divine authority .

The Critique of "Ilm Al-Rijal"

A major portion of the video attacks Ilm Al-Rijal (the Science of Men), a method used to verify the reliability of Hadith narrators. The speaker argues:

• It is an innovation not taught by the Imams, ironically adopted from Sunni schools of thought .
• It is logically flawed; the video uses the example of a narrator (Duhaim) who was considered "trustworthy" by scholars despite allegedly harboring hatred toward the Prophet's family (Ahl al-Bayt) .
• The Quran and Hadith actually warn against rejecting narrations based on the character of the messenger, as one might accidentally reject a truth from God.

Kurt Gödel, a brilliant mathematician, claimed to have found a logical flaw in the U.S. Constitution that could legally turn the democracy into a dictatorship. Discovered in 1947 while he studied for his citizenship exam, the "loophole" remains a mystery as it was never recorded. A leading theory focuses on Article 5: since it governs how to change the Constitution but is part of it, the rules for amendments could themselves be amended, potentially making any legal change possible.

The core of Gödel’s Loophole is a self-referential paradox. In logic, a system becomes unstable if its rules apply to themselves without restriction.

The paradox works like this: Article 5 defines the rules for changing the Constitution. However, Article 5 is *part* of the Constitution. Therefore, Article 5 can be used to change Article 5.

If a legal majority uses Article 5 to remove the requirements for a majority, they could theoretically "legally" abolish democracy. It is the constitutional version of wishing for more wishes.

i want to know if there is something like this in Quran