Not posting this to bash anyone. I just don't understand the logic and I'm looking for a perspective I might be missing.
Been talking to a woman for about a month now. Things have been good overall. She's smart, funny, easy to talk to. But there's this one thing that keeps coming up and I can't figure out how to process it.
She has a very good job. Like, significantly higher income than me — she's mentioned her salary casually a couple of times and it's not close. I'm not struggling but I'm not at her level either.
Despite this, there's a clear assumption that I should be covering things. Not occasionally. Structurally. When we talk about future plans there's this baseline expectation built in that provision is a male responsibility, full stop. She's also mentioned a few times that she believes a man who "really likes you" demonstrates it financially.
When I gently brought up that the income gap kind of complicates that framing for me, she said that money and attraction are separate things and that her income is hers.
And I get that in a vacuum. People's money is their money. But the same logic seems like it should apply to me too and somehow it doesn't in her framework.
I'm not looking to go 50/50 on everything rigidly. Relationships aren't spreadsheets. But I also can't figure out how "I earn more but you should pay because gender" is a position a person holds unironically in 2026.
Is this more common than I think right now? And is there a version of this conversation that actually goes somewhere productive?