3D scanned this metal detector coil cover using the Creality Sermoon S1
For this part, I used:
• Parallel line mode
• 0.2 mm resolution
• 2 separate scans: top side and bottom side
The result came out clean, with good edge definition and enough detail for reverse engineering, redesign, or reproducing a replacement part.
This is a good example of how 3D scanning can be useful for damaged, or harder-to-find plastic parts locally 👍
Tested the scanning capabilities of the Creality Sermoon S1 today on some relics I found metal detecting here in Finland.
Scanned objects:
• Old bullet case
• Finnish 1 Markka coin (1982)
Both were scanned using:
• Laser mode
• Parallel Line Mode
• 0.1 mm resolution
Pretty impressed with how well the small details and surface texture came out, especially on the coin considering its size. The Sermoon S1 handled the reflective and worn metal surfaces surprisingly well.
Always interesting to preserve small pieces of history digitally through 3D scanning 👍
Tested the scanning capabilities of the Creality Sermoon S1 today on some relics I found metal detecting here in Finland.
Scanned objects:
• Old bullet case
• Finnish 1 Markka coin (1982)
Both were scanned using:
• Laser mode
• Parallel Line Mode
• 0.1 mm resolution
Pretty impressed with how well the small details and surface texture came out, especially on the coin considering its size. The Sermoon S1 handled the reflective and worn metal surfaces surprisingly well.
Always interesting to preserve small pieces of history digitally through 3D scanning 👍
Hi guys,
I’m working on a Sea-Doo Spark 90 (2021) wear ring and trying to understand the actual internal geometry.
We bought an aftermarket wear ring locally, but after measuring it carefully with calipers in multiple positions, the internal diameter is consistently around 141.5–142.1 mm, which seems quite large compared to some specs found online (e.g. ~140.6 mm ID).
Because of this, I’m trying to clarify because now I'm completely confused:
What is the actual OEM internal diameter, and outside diameters for a new Spark wear ring ?
OE part number: 267000617. 267000813 267000925. 293200134.
What is the typical impeller-to-wear ring clearance (per side) ?
Is there any intentional taper or non-uniform profile inside the wear ring?
I have access to industrial 3D printing and CNC machining, and I’m prototyping a replacement ring with controlled tolerances and surface finish.
I’ve attached a picture with the dimensions that I need (red marks)
Any confirmed measurements or insights from people who have worked on these pumps would be highly appreciated (maybe even send you a wear ring that we make) 👍
ComplexScanChallenge
Tested out the new feature from Creality Scan 4.2.0, marker free laser scanning, on my Volvo V60 engine bay.
Came out great! It is a little bit slower than with markers, but when you think how much time you need to apply and also remove markers, its much faster.
Tracking whas great, no problems 👍
Scanner: Creality Sermoon S1 (wired to laptop)
Resolution: 0.5 mm
Marker free
Laptop: ASUS TUF, Ryzen 7 260, 32GB RAM, RTX 5060 8GB
If anyone haves any questions, feel free to dm me or leave a comment 👍
Full sunlight. Black glossy paint. No excuses!
This type of scans is one of the hardest surfaces you can scan, highly reflective, deep black automotive paint…and done outside, in real conditions, in full sunlight.
Yet the Creality Sermoon S1 handled it with ease:
✔️ Smooth tracking
✔️ Fast capture
✔️ Clean, detailed mesh
To lock in accuracy, I used AESUB by Scanningspray reflective dots and just a minimal touch of Aesub Blue spray, only on the edge of the charging port and the transition to the painted surface.
No full coating. No over-prep. Just precision where it matters.
From scan to usable model in minutes.
This is what real-world 3D scanning looks like.