r/3DScanning

Image 1 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 2 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 3 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 4 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 5 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 6 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 7 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 8 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 9 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 10 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 11 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 12 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode
Image 13 — BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode

BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser vs IR mode

This is the promised re-scan of the motorcycle in markerless laser mode after the latest update enabled markerless laser scanning in standalone mode.

Scanning

The motorcycle was scanned in markerless alser mode on the Rigil using 1mm resolution and feature tracking without connection to a PC. For scanning itself I didn't do any preparations like scan spray and focused on the both sides with one scan per side whilst ensuring enough overlap for easy alignment in later steps.
While scanning the Rigil held roughly 20 FPS. Scanning itself took roughly 5 to 10min per side, so a a bit longer than in IR mode (was using 1.5mm there though).
Tracking performance with the Rigil was very good, much better than on my Rockit. In comparison to the IR mode it still is a bit worse, simply because IR mode has a scan range of over 1m and therefore can work with way more data for tracking. Stability and performance of markerless laser scanning generally was very good and it feels like a production ready feature not a beta version or first release (in IT speak).

Post-Processing

Post processing was done on my workstation and included generation of the point clouds, automatic feature alignment and subsequent meshing in recommended settings. Quicksurface was used for alignment to the coordinate system and reduction of the point cloud size. Since it came out quite large I reduced it to 4M so the scan could be uploaded to Sketchfab.

Results

Both laser and IR came out very good but in laser mode the improved detail and sharpness is directly noticeable. Also the surface quality is a good bit better in laser mode. Best open both scans side by side on Sketchfab and have a closer look at them.

Sketchfab

Sketchfab is like printables for 3d scans with a nice integrated viewer in browser and you can also download the scan, just look at the scan yourself.
Reddit sadly blocks the short links to Sketchfab, you have to search for the title instead:

  • Laser Scan: "BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil Markerless Laser"
  • IR Scan: "BMW Motorcycle - Einscan Rigil IR Mode"

PC Specs

Since a lot of people ask for it:

  • AMD Ryzen 7950X
  • 128GB DDR5 RAM
  • RTX 5070Ti Desktop
  • A few TB of NVME storage with PCIe Gen4 interface
u/PrintedForFun — 16 hours ago
▲ 9 r/3Dmodeling+1 crossposts

Just released an android version of my free and open source 3D viewer!

We just released an .apk for f3d-android, a android version of the F3D open source 3D viewer. It's pretty barebone but it looks nice already!

Let me know what you think!

https://f3d.app/download

u/GloWondub — 13 hours ago

Flexscan3D Genicam industrial cameras not working

Hi, is anyone aware of a way to get a generic Genicam machine vision camera to work with flexscan3d? Currently when I try to select my camera it crashes before I can see the list of cameras. This only happens when the camera is plugged in to my computer. Thanks!

reddit.com
u/Basic_Appointment_90 — 6 hours ago

First scanner

I'm ready to pull the trigger on my first scanner but I am torn between a few options. I am mainly looking to reverse engineer some automotive interior pieces. My computer is a MacBook Air m4 24gb ram 512ssd. The three scanners im considering are einstar 2, metro y pro, and raptor. I'm leaning more towards the instant as it seems they have a better background in the industry. Does anyone have any insight on these three units and if they will run smoothly on my laptop? It seems to fit the requirements for everything on paper but that often differs from real world use.

reddit.com
u/wondering_man13 — 5 hours ago

Scanning action figure

how would I go about scanning this guys legs but has his articulation I know I would take him apart but I’ve never scanned something before and am curious what all I need to do or specifics of it

u/APugWearingAHoodie — 5 hours ago

Best ~ 2k Scanner for Painting Reliefs (e.g. brush strokes. etc) and texture capture?

Hi, I'm new to the whole 3D scanning sphere. I worked years ago with photogrammetry, that's it. So I want to capture the depth map and texture in high resolution and color accurcy of Oil Paintings and then use this to train a neural network to teach it texture -> depthmap for different painting styles.

I have a workstation with 256 GB Ram and a RTX 6000, so if I need to compute anything complex that wouldn't be a problem.

I don't want to use markers on a Oil Painting, but I think the texture and Geometry should provide enough data for tracking. I've been looking up possible scanners for this task and I found these ones:

Einstar Vega and Revopoint MIRACO Pro, not because of their portability and on device compute, but because they seem to have a 48 MP Camera for texture capture.

The only other one I see is the Einstar Rockit which can use cross lasers and other methods without markers, where I can use my Workstation for higher compute, but I fear that the 5 MP Camera will be a let down for good texture capture.

Do you have any suggestions what will be the best solution for my use case?

reddit.com
u/JealousEntrepreneur — 19 hours ago

Mobile 3D scanning apps that actually produce clean meshes?

I’ve been testing a bunch of phone-based 3D scanning tools lately, and most either take forever to process or leave a messy point cloud that needs hours of cleanup.

Recently I tried one called Aholo that uses Gaussian Splatting for both objects. The iOS app is straightforward to use, and the web version lets you process and view the model smoothly.

What surprised me was how little cleanup it needed compared to regular photogrammetry apps.

Curious what everyone’s go-to mobile scanning setup is these days — any apps that have been working well for you?

reddit.com
u/Low_Breadfruit_7781 — 4 hours ago
Week