u/Electrify338

Can the cracked version play with someone who owns the game?

So I am currently testing how useful AI models can be in day to day workflows, and went why not compare 3 models and see how good they are at replicating my work.

The goal was simple they were asked to replicate one of the kitchen cabinets I am designing for kitchen project and well they all went differently about the task.

Claude Sonnet 4.6: Claude was the fastest by a margin, it added the accessories on the first request and made user parameters, but they did not update the model when changed they were just there. Sadly I was testing the free version so immediatly ran out of limits after the one request. ( https://claude.ai/share/7d06b07c-b753-44cf-a253-f065e7a45448 )

ChatGPT 5.5 high ( in Codex ): Codex took a while and had trouble working in parametric mode so it decided to work in direct modelling, and well it did good adding the materials first try for wood (points for embedding its name on the front panel in a funny way). Sadly not including parameters was a let down and kinda useless for my workflow.

Gemini 3.1 Pro ( Gemini CLI ): Now Gemini CLI had a lot of trouble getting to get the pro model working at one point it took 45 mins before I gave up and had to try few hours later. However, Gemini did the best job of all 3 it created user parameters, and changing them would update the model. Gemini did need a second prompt as it did not add the accessories on the first prompt and had to be asked to add them.

Some Personal Takeaways: All 3 models did get the dimensions for each panel correctly and their relative location to each other. All 3 models did not look deeply enough at how the panels join to each other where the back panel is in the correct place, but its not cut correctly and not making the grooves on the side panels. Finally, I dont think AI will be able to model anytime soon but if used like a dynamic add on that can do tasks they work great.

Ik claude opus is the superior model and I plan to test it soon enough in a different more refined workflow, this was just to mess around.

The Prompt: I want you to create a replica from a file called BC_S1. do not copy and paste I want to test your modelling skills. The file should be saved in the AI playground project and I need you to add your AI name to the file.

My Model

Claude

ChatGPT

Gemini

So I am currently testing how useful AI models can be in day to day workflows, and went why not compare 3 models and see how good they are at replicating my work.

The goal was simple they were asked to replicate one of the kitchen cabinets I am designing for kitchen project and well they all went differently about the task.

Claude Sonnet 4.6: Claude was the fastest by a margin, it added the accessories on the first request and made user parameters, but they did not update the model when changed they were just there. Sadly I was testing the free version so immediatly ran out of limits after the one request. ( https://claude.ai/share/7d06b07c-b753-44cf-a253-f065e7a45448 )

ChatGPT 5.5 high ( in Codex ): Codex took a while and had trouble working in parametric mode so it decided to work in direct modelling, and well it did good adding the materials first try for wood (points for embedding its name on the front panel in a funny way). Sadly not including parameters was a let down and kinda useless for my workflow.

Gemini 3.1 Pro ( Gemini CLI ): Now Gemini CLI had a lot of trouble getting to get the pro model working at one point it took 45 mins before I gave up and had to try few hours later. However, Gemini did the best job of all 3 it created user parameters, and changing them would update the model. Gemini did need a second prompt as it did not add the accessories on the first prompt and had to be asked to add them.

Some Personal Takeaways: All 3 models did get the dimensions for each panel correctly and their relative location to each other. All 3 models did not look deeply enough at how the panels join to each other where the back panel is in the correct place, but its not cut correctly and not making the grooves on the side panels. Finally, I dont think AI will be able to model anytime soon but if used like a dynamic add on that can do tasks they work great.

Ik claude opus is the superior model and I plan to test it soon enough in a different more refined workflow, this was just to mess around.

The Prompt: I want you to create a replica from a file called BC_S1. do not copy and paste I want to test your modelling skills. The file should be saved in the AI playground project and I need you to add your AI name to the file.

My Model

Claude

ChatGPT

Gemini

I am so happy Autodesk have released MCP for fusion and they have been quite the help.

The main use I have been using it as a way to use APIs to automate tasks mostly configuration work. I have this design that has 103 configurations and going through naming them and making them has been a very slow process but both Claude and Gemini CLI have been really amazing I managed to finish one if the designs in less than 10 mins instead of almost 2 hours. Now in fairness, I have a very well made document that states what each configuration entails.

I am still messing around but I think it's main and should be it's only use is to be a much more user friendly way to use the APIs for automating tasks and maybe a design review that could give you insights on the model not make design changes tho.