
I built a CMS that works on MS-DOS, Netscape 3 and modern browsers (Web 1.0 approach)
I’ve been experimenting with the idea of “downgrading” the web — not just for nostalgia, but to explore simpler, more durable approaches to building sites.
As a result, I built a CMS that:
- works on MS-DOS and very old Windows systems
- uses extremely minimal HTML (roughly HTML 3.x level)
- still renders correctly in modern browsers (backward compatibility)
The editor intentionally mimics the workflow of early browsers like Netscape 3, so content is created in a way similar to late 90s websites.
Screenshots:
https://hamster.oldcities.org/2025_19_54_48.png
http://downgrade.w10.site/login.jpg
I’m curious from a developer perspective:
- Does this kind of extreme backward compatibility make any sense today?
- Where would you draw the line between constraints and usability?
- What would you improve in such a system?