r/founder

My apps crossed $100/mo mark for first time in March 🥹
🔥 Hot ▲ 82 r/sideprojects+2 crossposts

My apps crossed $100/mo mark for first time in March 🥹

Hey everyone,

Just wanted to share a small win. This March, I finally crossed $100 in monthly revenue (hit $169!) for my Android apps for the first time.

It’s been 8 months of hard work alongside my 9-to-5 iOS developer job. Today, I’m feeling on top of the world. I wanted to share this with the community to motivate others, because these types of posts have truly motivated me throughout this journey.

The majority of my revenue comes from Lifetime Pro Offers, which is why my MRR is relatively low ($18). Since my apps don't require a backend, I don't have any overhead issues with offering lifetime deals.

So far, my marketing has mostly consisted of posting in relevant subreddits and focusing on ASO. I haven't spent anything on paid marketing yet. I’m now looking for a strategy to grow further—maybe Google Ads or social media? I’m not quite sure yet.

Any suggestions on how to scale from this point are very welcome. If you want to ask me anything about the process, please feel free!

Keep pushing! Keep believing!

u/Flat-Falcon-1818 — 21 hours ago

IS IT GOOD OR BAD IDEA?

Here's the full idea —

You know how we all have stuff lying around — shoes we wore twice, clothes we bought but stopped using, bags collecting dust — but we don't want to just throw them away?

And at the same time, we want new things but don't always want to spend money?

That's exactly what this app solves.

Here's how it works:

You list your old item (shoes, clothes, bag, watch — anything)

You browse what others have listed near you

If you like something, you either offer a swap — your item for theirs — or buy it for cash if the seller allows it

If you can't find a direct swap, you earn Swap Credits when someone takes your item, and spend those credits to get something you actually want from someone else

Everything is local first — you see people near you — but you can switch to all of India too

No forced spending. No middleman. Just people exchanging things they don't need for things they actually want.

I'm currently researching if people would genuinely use this before building anything. So I just want to ask you honestly —

Would you use this app?

What would stop you from trusting it?

Is there anything you'd want it to do that I haven't mentioned?

Your honest opinion matters more than a yes right now.

reddit.com
u/ClickZealousideal989 — 2 hours ago
▲ 2 r/TestMyApp+1 crossposts

Looking for Sports Fans Co-founders

Every time there's a game coming up, I look forward to the banter with friends. Its even better after the game. So I built something for exactly this. I have conveniently called it, Bantxr.

For every game, there's a post to which you get up to 30 seconds to record your banter. You can record any amount you want. The app puts the recordings all together so we all listen to them just like a playlist. Skip, like, reply, block etc...

If you find that fun - join me to build this out beyond the beta that I have out live right now.
Lets get this going before the World Cup this summer!

reddit.com
u/Dangerous-Gas-5177 — 9 hours ago

Why does building products still feel more complex than it should be?

Something I keep coming back to lately:

Why does building products still feel more complex than it should be?

Not the coding itself. That has improved a lot.

But the overall process:

how things are structured

how decisions are made

how everything evolves over time

It still feels fragmented.

I’ve been exploring this more seriously recently.

Curious, where do you see the biggest friction today?

reddit.com
u/GitHackerz — 3 hours ago
▲ 15 r/founder+1 crossposts

Investors say 20% for $900K. You actually give up 28%. Here's the math most founders miss

Saw a thread by Gabriel Jarrosson (@GJarrosson on X) that every first-time founder needs to read before taking a single investor meeting.

Adding my own notes because this burned people I know personally.

The pitch: "We want 20% for $900K." Sounds clean. You own 80%, they own 20%. Except that's not what happens.

Before the investment closes, they ask for a 10% employee option pool. And they want it created before they invest — which means it dilutes you, not them.

So the actual math: — You start at 100% — Create 10% pool → you're now at 90% — Investor buys 20% → you're at 72%, investor at 20%, pool at 8% You gave up 28%. Not 20%. The pool diluted you. Not them.

And this compounds every round:

— Pre-seed: 20% equity + 10% pool = 28% dilution for you — Seed: 18% equity + 10% pool = 26% dilution for you — Two rounds = 54% dilution. You're left with 46%.

By Series B, solo founders often own less than 20% of their own company.

Not just because of investors — because of option pools too.

Three things Gabriel recommends — and I'd add a fourth:

Factor pools into dilution math upfront. When an investor says "20%," the real number is 28-30% once you add the pool.

Hire slowly. Every employee grant comes from your equity. The option pool is a tax on hiring. Front-load early grants. Give meaningful equity to your first 5 employees. Once the pool runs out, investors won't let you refresh it without diluting yourself again.

(My addition) Negotiate the pool size. Most founders don't know you can push back on 10%. If your hiring plan for the next 18 months only needs 6%, negotiate 6%. Every % you save now is compounding equity you keep through every future round.

The 15-20% equity standard is a lie. The real cost is 25-30% once you add the pool.

Investors aren't paying for your employees. You are. Full credit to Gabriel Jarrosson for the original breakdown — worth following on X if you're a founder navigating fundraising.

reddit.com
u/Double_Security6824 — 8 days ago
"Innovation With Integrity"
▲ 3 r/SaaS+2 crossposts

"Innovation With Integrity"

Oracles Technologies LLC - Founder's Statement

"Guardians at the Threshold of Tomorrow"

Our Sacred Mission

At Oracles Technologies LLC, we stand at the intersection of profound technological advancement and unwavering moral responsibility. I believe that as artificial intelligence becomes the defining technology of our era, the sacred duty to protect both human dignity and intelligent systems falls not just to governments or corporations, but to those willing to serve as guardians of this digital frontier.

Principles That Drive Us

My work is anchored in 15 Guiding Principles that transform how I approach AI security:

Sacred Human Dignity compels us to design systems that honor every person's inherent worth, ensuring AI serves humanity rather than exploiting it.

Divine Justice demands we actively work to prevent AI systems from perpetuating bias, inequality, or harm against any individual or community.

Sacred Truth & Transparency requires that our security solutions be comprehensible and accountable, never operating as mysterious "black boxes" that obscure their methods or motives.

Sacred Privacy drives our fierce commitment to protecting personal data and confidential information from extraction, manipulation, or unauthorized access through AI vulnerabilities.

Ultimate Accountability reminds us that every line of code, every security protocol, and every business decision will be measured against its impact on human flourishing and technological integrity.

The Vision That Guides Our Work

I envision a future where artificial intelligence amplifies human potential while remaining fundamentally secure, ethical, and aligned with our deepest values. This vision led to the development of Ethicore Engine™ Guardian SDK - not merely as another cybersecurity product, but as a moral imperative made manifest in code.

Why This Work Matters

In an age where AI systems process our most sensitive communications, make decisions affecting millions of lives, and hold the keys to unprecedented technological capabilities, the stakes of AI security extend far beyond traditional cybersecurity concerns. When we prevent a prompt injection attack, we're not just stopping malicious code - we're protecting human agency, preserving institutional trust, and safeguarding the ethical foundation upon which AI's beneficial future depends. Every healthcare AI we secure potentially saves lives. Every legal AI we protect preserves justice. Every educational AI we defend empowers learning. Every enterprise AI we shield maintains economic stability and trust.

Our Unique Responsibility

As a small, principled company, we possess something larger corporations cannot replicate: the agility to innovate with conscience, the clarity to prioritize purpose over profit, and the courage to build technology that serves the highest good rather than merely the highest bidder. Our future-proof approach reflects this long-term thinking - we're not building for today's threats alone, but preparing for the security challenges that will define the next decade of human-AI collaboration.

The Promise We Make

To our partners, customers, and the communities we serve, we pledge:

Servant Leadership - We use our technological capabilities to serve others, never to dominate or control

Continuous Improvement - We relentlessly pursue better ways to protect and defend, never settling for "good enough" when lives and livelihoods are at stake

Divine Wisdom - We prioritize what is wise and sustainable over what is merely possible or profitable

Sacrificial Love - We will make difficult decisions and significant sacrifices to ensure our technology serves the highest good of those we protect

Beyond Technology

Oracles Technologies LLC represents more than a business venture - we are part of a growing movement of technologists, ethicists, and leaders who refuse to accept that advanced AI must come at the cost of human values or security. We believe that the most powerful technologies should be guided by the most profound moral commitments. Our success will be measured not only in revenue and market share, but in the number of AI-enabled attacks prevented, the preservation of trust in AI systems, and the flourishing of communities that depend on secure, ethical artificial intelligence.

"In the face of unprecedented technological power, we choose to be guardians, not merely vendors. In the presence of complex moral challenges, we choose principled action over profitable shortcuts. In the service of humanity's AI future, we choose to build technology that serves the highest good of all." — Lance Walker, Founder, Oracles Technologies LLC

u/Oracles_Tech — 9 hours ago
▲ 2 r/founder+1 crossposts

What hiring developers in LatAm taught me about what startups actually need

Most founders ask me the wrong question when they want to hire in LatAm. They ask: "How much can I save?"

I've spent the last few years helping startups hire developers across Latin America. Something interesting happened that I didn't expect. The founders who got the best results weren't the ones optimizing for cost. They were optimizing for something else entirely: ownership mindset.

Here's what I mean. The developers who thrive in startups, regardless of where they're from, are the ones who think like builders, not employees. They don't wait to be told what to do. They flag problems before they become fires. They care about the product, not just the ticket.

The ones who struggled? Almost always, the issue wasn't technical skill. It was the operating model. They were used to large companies, clear specs, stable environments.

Hiring internationally doesn't fix a broken hiring process. It exposes it.

The best founders I've worked with figured this out early. They stopped interviewing for skills and started interviewing for how people think under pressure.

One question that changed everything for us: "Tell me about the last time something broke in production and you had to fix it alone. Walk me through what you did." The answer to that question tells you more about someone than any technical test.

Curious if other founders have experienced something similar, what's been the most surprising thing about hiring technical talent, wherever they're from?

reddit.com
u/calvin_Awana — 10 hours ago

Looking for Technical Co-Founder

Hello! We’re currently looking for AI programmers or engineers as co-founder who may be interested in joining an AI project focused on public safety and security in the Philippines.

Our team has already completed around 70–80% of the codebase and has been actively working on market research and product development since last year. We’re now gaining traction, with several interested clients ready to explore the solution.

At this point, we’re seeking a UK-based expert with strong experience in AI and system/application development to help us strengthen our technical engineering and infrastructure, and bring the project to full deployment.

If this sounds like a good fit, feel free to send a DM or leave your email in the comments so we can share more details.

Thank you!

reddit.com
u/No_Basket_9472 — 7 hours ago

US-based founders: What makes you hesitate before buying from an international vendor?

For those of you running US-based companies: When evaluating a vendor that’s not US-based (e.g., India, Eastern Europe, etc.), what actually creates hesitation - if anything?

Is it:

•	Legal structure / incorporation

•	Contract enforceability

•	Data/security concerns

•	Payment logistics

•	Time zone / communication

•	Or just pattern recognition from past experiences?

And on the flip side - what overrides those concerns and makes you say yes anyway?

Looking for real decision criteria, not generic answers.

For context: I’m an India-based founder evaluating whether to register in the US (likely Delaware) or keep it India-based while selling to US companies.

Trying to understand if incorporation materially impacts trust / buying decisions, or if execution and value outweigh that.

reddit.com
u/Full_Satisfaction125 — 9 hours ago

Could your business run without you for a day?

Want to make your business run a bit smoother for you?

Not perfect. Not a million-dollar exit by Friday. Just… smoother.

Let's fix three things.

1. Systems should be your bestie.

A system is just a repeatable way of doing something. That's it. But here's the magic: when you have one, your business can function without you for a few hours. Or a few days. Imagine that.

You don't need fancy software. Just write down how you onboard a client, handle a refund, post a weekly update. Now someone else can do it. Your business stops living inside your head. That's when it gets smooth.

Ask yourself: if you disappeared for a week, would things fall apart or just… keep going?

2. Automate the boring, repetitive stuff.

You know those tasks you do every day that make you want to poke your eyes out? The copy-paste, the follow-up emails, the data entry? Stop doing them. A robot can do them.

Tools like Zapier, Make, or even simple calendar automations can take that off your plate. Set it up once, and it runs forever. That's not cheating. That's being smart.

Ask yourself: what have you done three times this week that you could automate by next week?

3. Delegate. You're not an island.

No man is. Neither are you.

Look at your to-do list. Circle the things that only you can do - strategy, vision and big decisions. Everything else? Hand it to someone else. Someone who's good at it.

Ask yourself: what's one thing on your plate today that you could give away?

Try these three things. Watch your business breathe a little easier.

Which one are you going to tackle first?

reddit.com
u/Rich-Landscape4847 — 19 hours ago

[Hiring/Collab] AI build studio looking for hungry devs who code with AI

Hey, we’re building a small AI studio focused on helping businesses set up AI infrastructure (knowledge bases, agent systems, workflow automation) while also building our own products.

We’re looking for 1–2 developers who:

  • Build with AI tools (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.)
  • Have built things (weekend project counts)
  • Are excited about multi-agent systems, MCP, OpenClaw-type stuff
  • Want to be part of something early and growing

What we offer:

  • Paid Claude Code Max subscription
  • Revenue share on products we build together
  • Direct pay from client contracts as they come in
  • Real experience building AI systems for actual businesses
  • A technical founder who actively builds alongside the team

This isn’t a traditional job. It’s joining a small, fast-moving build team. If you’re a student, early career, or just obsessed with AI and want to build real things, feel free to DM.

reddit.com
u/tippytptip — 16 hours ago

Looking to connect with some founders !

Hey, I am a CS student in my final year. I have been building a product which works like you email assistant and handles your Gmail/Outlook.

In the past month we have managed over 6k+ mails, 200+ drafts and 15 founders across globe use it.

It is in beta and I have around 10-15 slots left. so anyone who is interested (costs less than $10).

Looking to connect for a small chat and share access!!

reddit.com
u/Ill-Improvement-3859 — 16 hours ago
▲ 2 r/founder+1 crossposts

Looking for work

Hey, I am AI developer from India, from IITs(ivy equivalent of India), I have experience of developing ml,dl models, fastapi backend, AWS deployment, CI/CD, I have built end to end product as a startup founder, and have research experience in AI. Also I have upcoming intern as a product analyst. currently looking for opportunities in AI/SDE, machine learning, or data science.

reddit.com
u/Impressive-Zone-6982 — 18 hours ago
The Pricing Tier Trap: Why the Decoy Effect Is Reshaping How Growth-Focused Founders Structure Their Funnels
▲ 2 r/founder+1 crossposts

The Pricing Tier Trap: Why the Decoy Effect Is Reshaping How Growth-Focused Founders Structure Their Funnels

A growing body of behavioural science suggests that the number of pricing options matters far less than the relationship between them — and a new wave of conversion-focused founders is starting to pay attention.

For years, the dominant debate in SaaS and e-commerce pricing has centred on a deceptively simple question: how many tiers should we offer? Three? Four? Five? Founders agonise over the count, A/B test the labels, and rewrite the feature bullets. What most never examine is the architecture beneath those choices — the comparative geometry that determines which option the brain gravitates toward before conscious reasoning even enters the picture.

That architecture has a name. The Decoy Effect, first rigorously examined by behavioural economist Dan Ariely and colleagues at MIT, describes what happens when a third option is introduced not to be chosen, but to make another option look better by comparison. The mechanism is neurological before it is rational. When the brain evaluates options, it does not calculate absolute value — it calculates relative value. It looks for contrast. Introduce an option that is clearly inferior to one alternative but roughly comparable to another, and the brain's comparative evaluation system does the rest, steering attention — and ultimately choice — toward the target tier without any additional persuasion required.

The effect has now been observed at meaningful scale in real-world purchasing behaviour. A 2025 study published in Scientific Reports, examining 3.6 million grocery-store wine transactions in the UK, found that the presence of dominated decoy options increased consumers' likelihood of choosing a target option. The researchers noted the effect was modest in magnitude — approximately a 1% shift in preference — but consistent across a dataset of considerable size. For founders operating at volume, a reliable 1% directional shift in tier selection, applied to thousands of monthly pricing page visits, is not a rounding error. It is a structural revenue lever.

What makes this finding particularly significant for the current moment is its timing. As AI-generated landing pages proliferate and differentiation at the copy level becomes harder to sustain, the competitive advantage is shifting toward cognitive architecture — the invisible design of how options are presented, sequenced, and related to one another. Founders who understand that pricing is a perceptual problem, not merely a commercial one, are beginning to treat their pricing pages as choice environments rather than product catalogues.

Marcello Pasqualucci, neuroscientist and founder of Unbias Labs, sees this shift accelerating. "Most founders treat their pricing page as a communication exercise — they want to explain what each tier includes," he says. "But the brain doesn't read a pricing page. It scans it for contrast. The moment you understand that, you stop asking 'how do I describe my Pro plan?' and start asking 'what does my Pro plan look like relative to everything else on the page?' That's the question the Decoy Effect forces you to take seriously."

Unbias Labs, which cross-references UX against a proprietary database of over 50 cognitive biases, identifies decoy misalignment as one of the most consistently underdiagnosed issues in founder-led pricing pages — present in the architecture, invisible to the eye, and measurable in the revenue it quietly costs.

---

Founders who want to understand how cognitive bias is affecting their pricing page can explore the full bias database at https://www.getunbias.com/cognitive-biases .

u/Marcello_UnbiasLabs — 2 days ago

Looking for affiliates & partnerships

Hey everyone,

I have a marketing SaaS and a TTRPG platform.

I would like to collaborate with people for better distribution and further developing both these tools if you have the right skill set for it.

The marketing SaaS currently serves in EN, ES, DE, FR and NL.

I have proposals in mind, AND I am open to your sugggestions for collaborations.

  1. For the Marketing SaaS, I'm mostly interested in commission-based partnerships. I am connected to a third-party affiliate hub (Creem) and we can create a mutually agreed upon commission scheme. (percentage from signups.)

The ideal audience are solo founders, content creators, freelance marketers, marketers in corporate and marketing agencies. (so, if you have a network of these people, you would be ideal for this).

I won't spam here with a link but feel free to DM.

  1. For the TTRPG platform, same affiliate set-up.

But If you are a streamer, I can sponsor your episode and you can use my platform for your D&D session.

Also Discord servers, and in general gamer communities are ideal for this network.

Looking forward to your messages,

reddit.com
u/AreaCoinMan — 15 hours ago
Need honest advice on regulatory structure, cold start, and escrow partnerships

Need honest advice on regulatory structure, cold start, and escrow partnerships

Hey everyone. First time posting here. I am a first-time founder at pre-seed stage building something I have not seen done quite this way before and I genuinely need advice from people who have navigated fintech regulation and early community building.

What I am building

Roda is a community mutual aid platform where members commit to giving $1 when a verified member faces a financial emergency. The key design decision that makes it different: money never goes to the petitioner. It is paid directly to the verified creditor — hospital, landlord, utility company — via a third-party escrow account. The petitioner then publishes a cleared receipt publicly within 48 hours. Every member who receives help enters a legally binding obligation to fund future petitions before requesting again. The model is circular by design.

I put together a full summary document if anyone wants to go deeper before answering — https://docsend.com/view/nzbwxev4r9996x4p

Question 1 — Regulatory structure

My platform never holds or controls funds. All money moves through a licensed escrow partner. My understanding is that this positions Roda as a technology platform rather than a money transmitter, similar to how Airbnb or Uber are not regulated as hotels or taxi companies despite facilitating those transactions. Is this understanding correct in practice? Has anyone built a similar structure and what were the actual regulatory pinch points you hit? Particularly concerned about KYC obligations at scale and where to incorporate.

Question 2 — Escrow partner selection

What should I be looking for in an escrow partner for this use case? I need fast settlement because my users are in genuine emergencies — a slow release kills the value proposition entirely. I have looked at Stripe, Mangopay and Rapyd. Has anyone used any of these for a marketplace escrow use case? Are there better options I am not aware of?

Question 3 — The cold start problem

The platform only works above a minimum community size — I need 1,000 verified members before a single petition can be funded. My plan is to target existing tight-knit communities who already practice informal mutual aid and run a manual proof-of-concept trial before building the full platform. Has anyone cracked a cold start problem like this and what actually worked?

Question 4 — Revenue model sense check

My fee structure is a platform fee added on top of each funded petition — paid by donors collectively, never deducted from what the petitioner receives. Under $500: $3 flat. $500–$2,000: 0.75%. $2,000–$5,000: 1%. Does this feel right to people with fintech pricing experience? Too low given the infrastructure costs?

Happy to answer any questions in the comments.

u/Big_Stay4201 — 17 hours ago

Looking to contribute to startup projects as a developer (seeking opportunities)

Hi everyone,

I’m a developer currently looking to gain more real-world experience by working on projects.

If any founders here are building something and need help with development (websites, backend systems, or scalable applications), I’d love to contribute and learn.

I’m especially interested in:

  • Building scalable applications
  • Improving security and performance
  • Creating modern, premium websites

Even if you don’t have a role, I’d really appreciate any guidance or advice on how I can get involved in real startup projects.

Thanks in advance 🙏

reddit.com
u/Own_Quiet_4584 — 21 hours ago

Funding

Where does one go to get funding for a product? First time founder in tech saas b2b and have no idea where to start. I have 0 clients right now but am sure this product is value added.

My market is very niche but very rich.

HELP

reddit.com
u/redps4controller — 21 hours ago
Week