
r/eulaw

Why did Denmark bother getting a explicit reservation from adopting the Euro if Sweden has basically found a loophole from ever adopting it(convergence criteria)?
Endless loophole
>“Europe faces a clear moral test, when its Foreign Ministers meet in Luxembourg tomorrow, 21 April, to consider the suspension, in full or in part of this Agreement,” the experts said. “This meeting is taking place amid growing public demand within Europe for accountability.”
>“The European Citizens’ Initiative calling for full suspension of the Agreement in light of Israel’s human rights violations, has gathered over one million signatures to date,” they said.
Please note that you must be a EU citizen to sign the European Citizen Initiative (petition)!
Rules on ECI data/ min. age requirements by Member State:
https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/data-requirements_en
• Austria, Belgium, Germany, Malta: min. age 16 years
• Greece: min. age 17 years
• Other EU countries: min. age 18 years.
We visited Croatia last year in July 2025. I got an email from my rental car in April 2026 that I entered an unauthorized zone and they are charging the rental car company 1,580 EUR for each infraction of me entering the “unauthorized zone”
At this time I don’t remember what happened back in July 2025. Also I thought there was no parking so we always parked in a garage. Now I am finding about this ticket.
Does anyone know a good lawyer or have any experience with this? I have heard if I ask the authorities to charge me as a natural person then it’s lowered? Is that true?
Ziobro confirms he is in US, says he travelled there with document issued by Hungary
“What legal basis allowed Zbigniew Ziobro to leave Hungarian territory and enter the United States without valid documents?”
[LV] Trading Pro “Technical Error” and attempt to settle with “Reward”
Sup folks, I want to start a personal thread about the issue I faced with Revolut Trading Pro.
TLDR; Revolut closed my position by mistake, admitted, but refund only the difference between settle price and market price as “Reward”
So I bought $CAPR stock recently (I’m trading with biotech companies mostly). On 29th April I set up stop order trigger with price $29.91. Purchase price was 33.72.
04th of May $CAPR was opened with gap up and continued to rapidly grow so I was happy until I got notification from Revolut that my stop order was executed with price $27.74 !!! Ok I understand these type of stocks are volatile for sure, and it could happen such sudden drop (after earnings etc). So I quickly open app and $CAPR was not even close. In fact it was far far away from my stop trigger.
I immediately contacted support, but I was gaslighted that it is risky asset bla-bla-bla.
So I said please share me details where I will see the instant drop of the price for more that 10% and having the lowest price possible of the execution… and silence for next few days.
Yesterday I finally got reply that Revolut admitted error with this order and ready to refund me!
You know having such stress I was expecting to get something in return upon my full differential amount. So I said to support that I will check and decide the refund option at first before to accept.
The supporter returned back and said we will refund you with $126 as the difference between $27.74 and market price at that moment $32.24.
I was shocked, in fact, so I reject such refund and demanded the following:
- fully difference between my entry price and sold price e.g. roughly $170
- compensation for the stress and loosing the trust for the service of Trading Pro (which cost 15€ per month)
Obviously the supporter said it is not up to them, so I have to write formal complaint to their legal.
I filled the form, and in parallel I saw that they still “refund” those $126 on trading account. And guess what guys? They marked it as “REWARD”. If you living in Europe you know that is taxable income, so instead of 1 headache they gave me another one.
Back to the story. I received today forma bla-bla response and their “goodwill” coverage for the stress with amount of 30€. So even with this amount I have loss around $10 of my initial investment.
The good part is that they confirmed of their error in the response, so I filled official complaint letter the authority (Bank of Lithuania).
As I’m not the best in legal terms so I asked ai help of the list of their violation:
REVOLUT VIOLATIONS SUMMARY:
MiFID II Best Execution Breach: Revolut is legally required to obtain the best possible result for clients. Executing at $27.74 when the actual market price was $32.24 (a 14% difference) is a massive regulatory failure.
Execution Outside Market Range: The daily low for CAPR was $31.06. Revolut executed my trade at $27.74—a price that literally did not exist on any exchange that day. This is "Gross Negligence," not market volatility.
Trading Pro Service Failure: I paid €15/month for a "Pro" subscription. This is a "Failure of Paid Service" and "Product Mis-selling," as the premium tool failed to perform its core function.
Tax Manipulation (The "Reward" Trick): Instead of a formal "Compensatory Settlement," Revolut labeled $126 of the refund as a "Reward." This is a dirty tactic to:
- Hide operational errors from regulators by masking them as marketing expenses.
- Shift the tax burden to the customer (Rewards are taxable income in many jurisdictions, whereas compensation is not).Operational Resilience Breach (DORA): Under the Digital Operational Resilience Act, this "technical error" proves their trading infrastructure lacks the necessary safeguards to prevent systemic execution bugs.
Bad Faith Settlement: Attempting to "lowball" a customer with $124 when the math-verified loss was $170+ is a violation of basic consumer protection standards for financial institutions.
So I will continue to fight for my rights in parallel will update this post or create a chain.
By the way if you ever experienced of similar situation when REVOLUT executed with significant lower price let me know. I’m sure such errors is quite common and cannot be hidden under “market volatility”.
Hi everyone,
I’m making this post because I’m tired of being gaslit by Revolut support regarding Instant SEPA transfers.
As a reminder, Regulation (EU) 2024/886 is now fully in effect. For banks within the Eurozone (including Revolut via its Lithuanian license), the deadline to fully implement the sending of Instant SEPA payments was October 2025. We are now well past that.
The Issue:
I’ve been trying to move funds to Trading 212. T212’s intermediary banks are part of the Instant SEPA scheme, yet Revolut consistently processes my deposits as "Standard SEPA," causing delays of hours or even days. It happens every time.
The Support Excuse (see screenshot):
Support (Subham) claims that the "beneficiary's bank might not be part of the scheme" or that there might be a "processing error."
Why this is total BS:
- The Law is Clear: Under the new mandate, if a bank offers standard SEPA, they MUST offer Instant SEPA. It is no longer an "optional" feature or a "premium" perk.
- The "Error" Loophole: Claiming a "processing error" that defaults to standard SEPA is a convenient way for Revolut to bypass the 10-second rule mandated by the EU. If it happens consistently, it's not an error—it’s a configuration choice.
- Price Parity: The law also mandates that Instant SEPA cannot cost more than standard SEPA. Since Revolut offers free standard transfers, they are legally obligated to provide Instant for free and by default whenever the receiving bank is capable.
It feels like Revolut is intentionally downgrading transfers to manage their own liquidity or save on infrastructure costs, hoping users won't cite the specific EU Regulation.
Has anyone else noticed Revolut "accidentally" failing to use Instant SEPA lately?
I am preparing a formal complaint to the Bank of Lithuania (Lietuvos bankas). If a transfer isn't completed within 10 seconds and both institutions are in the SEPA Instant network, Revolut is in direct breach of EU law.
Source: Regulation (EU) 2024/886 on Instant Credit Transfers
Is there any legal mechanism to expel a rogue state from the EU?
reddit.comCoE French language requirements
Hello! I intend to apply for college of Europe and I believe I have good chances. Yet I do not have a French Language Diploma. I am taking intensive courses and I believe I can get to a level of B2 by the time of application. Yet, I will not be able to take an exam. Can I still get shortlisted or it is considered as I do not fulfill the requirements?
ING Belgium pays €1.6 million settlement in Didier Reynders money laundering case
brusselstimes.comCan they be kicked out or lose their voting rights in the council or lose funding from EU?
I will be starting the International and European Law bachelor at the University of Groningen and I have been thinking a lot about what comes after, the field sounds really interesting to me but I am not sure how things look in reality, I am trying to understand what kind of opportunities this degree actually opens, how competitive it is to get into Brussels roles or EU institutions, and whether most people end up needing an LLM to make it work, if anyone has experience with this degree or a similar path I would really appreciate hearing your perspective
As the title says, I (28 m) am interested in making a move to the EU. Though I am U.S. born and raised, I have German citizenship. Uncertainty about the future here, rising cost of living, and an extremely demanding work culture have made me curious about finding a way to practice in the EU. My German is around B2, but I am open to moving most places in the EU and am a fairly quick language learner (though I certainly wouldn't be professionally proficient in any relevant time frame). What would you recommend I do to craft a career path practicing law in the EU?
Here are my thoughts: Getting an LLM at an accredited EU institution seems like a reasonable way of getting my foot in the door. Though I imagine I will largely be bound to working for international U.S. firms, this could also be a time to study for necessary exams (say, the Irish QLTT exam, which would then admit me to practice in other EU jurisdictions).
I have some specialized experience in the issuance of bonds and other types of municipal financing. It wouldn't be much of a jump to get an LLM in international tax law or a related field. I have a strong research background in natural resources (water) law, though my impression is that is extremely specific to the U.S. (and even more so to my jurisdiction).
I decided to go to law school in the first place after living in Jerusalem for a year and being motivated to use my skills for human rights purposes (read: Palestine). I have strayed far from that original goal, and I'm feeling it. Is there a world in which human rights law is a viable career path at all?