r/StockInvest
The Future of AI Stocks Could Depend on This NVDA Earnings
The earnings report of NVDA is in a few hours' time, but if you are investing or you have invested, these are things you should know, and their positive or negative outcome will affect the stock.
The first one is Revenue and Future Guidance. This talks about how much money they made and how much more they may make in the future. Although Nvidia already told investors that they should expect around $78B revenue, Wall Street is expecting around $87B next quarter.
Secondly, another thing is about the US sending advanced chips to China, which was one of the biggest markets for NVDA before it was cut short. Although I have asked Google and GetAgent about the possibility of how it could go, I now know that if any of these reasons go the right way, then traders and investors will make good earnings from this Q1 earnings result.
When will Mu hit $4000?
Its not a bubble! Its backed by earnings. Full ported today.
I’m 41 this year, and for the first time in my life, I feel like my job is completely irrelevant.
I live in Phoenix. My life isn’t anything special. I bought my house before mortgage rates skyrocketed, I own a paid-off truck, I got divorced a few years ago nothing fancy about my life. Most people around me probably think I’m just a middle-aged guy working at an ordinary company.
To be honest, that’s pretty much how I’ve lived most of my life.
A few years ago, when everyone online was calling PLTR a meme stock, I started building a position. I remember buying in at a low of around $10, and every time the stock dropped another 10%, I’d get anxious. Friends told me it was dead money, and half the internet said its valuation made no sense.
But I could never shake the feeling that, whether people liked the company or not, governments and big corporations would eventually become increasingly reliant on AI-driven data systems.
I currently hold just over 18,000 shares.
Even saying that still feels absurd to me, because there was a time when I genuinely believed I’d made a huge mistake.
Before I knew it, thanks to PLTR, NVDA, and a bunch of boring index funds I’ve been steadily buying, my net worth broke the $3.5 million mark this year.
No yachts. No Rolex collection. To be honest, my biggest bragging right is probably waking up and realizing I no longer worry about bills.
This is the part nobody tells you when your money starts piling up. This emotional shift is far stranger than the material changes.
I used to dwell on every day the market went down. Now I’m more focused on not doing something stupid that could ruin what has already changed my life.
Believe me, I’ve made plenty of mistakes before this.
Selling winners too early. Holding junk stocks for too long. Chasing hype. Panic-selling during pullbacks.
PLTR just happened to be the one I was patient enough to hold until the very end.
I’m curious how many people here are currently holding a stock and genuinely believe that if they just leave it alone for another 5 to 10 years, it will completely transform their future.
Hey guys, if you missed it, CytoDyn just settled $500K with investors over claims it misled the market about its drug leronlimab some time ago. And they have already sent the agreement to the court for final approval.
In a nutshell, in 2021, CytoDyn was accused of overstating the effectiveness and regulatory progress of leronlimab. In short, the FDA later said the company’s claims were not supported by data, revealing no clear benefit.
After this news came out, the stock dropped 25%, and investors filed a lawsuit for their losses.
The good news is that the company recently agreed to settle $500K with them, and already sent this agreement to the court for final approval. So, if you invested in $CYDY when all of this happened, you can check the details and file your claim here.
Anyway, has anyone here invested in $CYDY at that time? How much were your losses, if so?
Which one is that stock that you massively regret not buying?
(Cannot say Nvidia 😉)
Your One Conviction Stock
If you could only choose one stock the one you’d keep holding no matter what, even if the market’s down, your portfolio is in the red, and nobody seems optimistic about it in the short term which one would it be?
Not a short term trade. Not a speculation. I’m talking about that one stock you genuinely believe in the kind you’d keep holding, and even keep adding to on the dips.
I think everyone has a stock like that. Maybe it’s not doing much right now. Maybe you’re even down on it at the moment.But deep down, you still believe its future will eventually prove you right.
To me, the stocks truly worth holding long term aren’t the ones that make you excited when they’re going up they’re the ones you’re still willing to stand behind when the market feels weak and sentiment turns negative.
It could be a tech stock, or something more traditional.
It could be a profitable blue chip company, or a high growth company you really believe in.
So what’s your pick?
What’s the story behind why you believe in it?
Curious to hear what everyone’s holding onto maybe we’ll all discover a few great companies worth keeping on our radar for the long run.
Why Would A Tiny Copper Explorer Suddenly Bring In A Geopolitical And ESG Strategist? I Think NovaRed Sees Where The Market Is Going Before Most Investors Do.
At first glance, this looked like a pretty standard junior mining PR.
Small company.
New advisory board appointment.
Move on.
But the more I read through it, the more I realized this announcement might actually say a LOT about how NovaRed sees the future copper market developing over the next 5-15 years.
Because this is NOT a geology-focused hire.
NovaRed didn’t appoint another driller.
They didn’t bring in another geophysicist.
They didn’t add another mining engineer.
Instead, they appointed Jacob Amsterdam, someone with a background in:
international law
geopolitics
ESG strategy
anti-corruption investigations
public policy disputes
stakeholder engagement
strategic communications
cross-border advisory work
That’s a VERY unusual profile for a company this early-stage.
And honestly… I think the reason is becoming obvious when you zoom out and look at what’s happening globally in copper right now.
The entire copper market is changing.
Fast.
According to S&P Global:
global copper demand could rise from 28 million metric tons in 2025 to 42 million metric tons by 2040
AI data center copper demand alone could approach 572,000 metric tons annually
EV copper demand could grow from 2.6 million tons to more than 5 million tons
global transmission and distribution spending may exceed $7.5 TRILLION by 2040
That is an absolutely massive infrastructure buildout.
And the crazy part is that almost every future growth industry suddenly needs the same material:
copper.
AI infrastructure.
Data centers.
Electric vehicles.
Power grids.
Defense systems.
Renewables.
Industrial electrification.
All competing for the same supply simultaneously.
Now look at the supply side.
The United States currently has:
only 2 primary copper smelters remaining
roughly 45% import dependency for refined copper
mine permitting timelines averaging around 20-30 years in some cases
Meanwhile China controls:
roughly 50%+ of global copper refining capacity
massive downstream processing infrastructure
huge investments across Africa and South America
This is why copper is slowly shifting from:
“commodity”
to:
“strategic infrastructure.”
And I honestly think NovaRed understands that shift earlier than many junior miners do.
That’s why this advisory appointment stood out to me.
Because once copper becomes tied to:
national security
AI infrastructure
industrial policy
supply chain resilience
ESG compliance
government incentives
strategic domestic sourcing
then governance and geopolitical positioning suddenly become VERY important.
This PR feels like NovaRed is preparing for that environment now instead of waiting until later.
Yet they are already trying to position around:
AI-driven mineral exploration
district-scale copper targeting
responsible critical minerals
governance narratives
strategic North American supply chains
That is actually a pretty sophisticated branding strategy for a junior explorer.
The Wilmac project itself has also been growing.
The company has:
expanded the land package to more than 16,000 hectares
continued advancing geophysical targeting
discussed interpreted intrusive centers
highlighted copper-in-soil anomalies
referenced porphyry-style potential in British Columbia’s Quesnel Belt
At the same time they launched:
the MetalCore AI exploration platform
customer onboarding initiatives
AI-focused exploration narratives
So now you have this interesting combination forming:
AI infrastructure growth → copper demand growth → North American supply chain focus → AI-assisted mineral exploration.
That is a MUCH bigger narrative than “small explorer drills some holes.”
Even the option structure here tells a story.
NovaRed granted:
90,000 advisory board options
exercisable at C$2.04
for a two-year period
Meaning compensation is directly tied to long-term share appreciation and company development.
That usually signals management wants advisors aligned with future strategic growth
Obviously this is still speculative.
That’s reality.
But from a macro positioning standpoint, I honestly think this PR was smarter than many people realize.
It feels like NovaRed is trying to evolve into:
“a future-facing strategic copper platform”
instead of staying:
“another tiny mining microcap.”
And if copper really becomes one of the core bottlenecks of the AI infrastructure era, that positioning could matter a lot more than the market currently expects.
NFA.
Which ETFs do you think will rise a lot in the next 6-12 months?
Which ETFs do you think have the biggest upside over the next 6–12 months?
Semis and AI already exploded, but could ETFs tied to semiconductors, uranium, crypto miners, robotics, space, or defense still do +40%, +70%, even +100% from here?
Curious what people think are the very strong upside ones going forward.
NRED Went From C$0.05 To Over C$2 While Still Pre-Discovery - And Now They’re Adding ESG + AI
What’s interesting about NovaRed Mining (NRED / NREDF) right now is that the company is evolving on multiple fronts at the same time instead of relying on a single narrative.
Over roughly the last 12 months, the stock moved from around C$0.05 to above C$2 at peak levels depending on the session, representing one of the stronger speculative reratings in the junior copper space. Multiple market trackers now show yearly gains measured in the thousands of percent.
Usually when a junior miner runs this hard, the story becomes purely momentum driven. But NovaRed keeps layering in additional pieces that make the company look more sophisticated than a typical exploration microcap.
First, there’s the Wilmac copper-gold project in British Columbia, positioned in a known porphyry belt near Copper Mountain. Then there’s the AI angle through MetalCore and the company’s recently announced provisional patent filing tied to artificial intelligence-driven mineral exploration systems.
Now they’ve added Jake Amsterdam to the advisory board, bringing experience in ESG, governance, anti-corruption strategy, international investigations, and stakeholder engagement. That’s a very unusual combination for a company at this stage.
To me, the market is starting to recognize that modern mining companies will probably need three things simultaneously over the next decade: strong copper exposure, technology integration, and credible ESG positioning. NovaRed seems to be trying to build all three at once.
That obviously doesn’t remove exploration risk. The company is still pre-resource and pre-production. But structurally, this feels much more like an emerging "critical minerals + AI + governance" story than a standard junior explorer.
Drawing upon over twenty years of experience in the investment market—and I will say this only once—my advice for May is as follows
COST (Costco) — Buy
V (Visa) — Must buy
MA (Mastercard) — Must buy
JPM (JPMorgan Chase) — Buy
BAC (Bank of America) — Buy
DIS (Disney) — Don’t buy
NKE (Nike) — Don’t buy
BA (Boeing) — Don’t buy
People ask: “Why don’t you charge?”
Sharing is my passion—that’s why I post for free.
This is not financial advice; I am merely sharing my views.
Here are the top ten holdings in Goldman Sachs' $870 billion 13F portfolio, including their market value and weight
Nvidia (NVDA): $31.5 billion (3.62%)
Apple (AAPL): $27 billion (3.11%)
SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY): $23.8 billion (2.73%)
Microsoft (MSFT): $22.7 billion (2.60%)
Alphabet Class A Shares (GOOGL): $16.6 billion (1.91%)
Amazon (AMZN): $14.1 billion (1.62%)
Broadcom (AVGO): $11.2 billion (1.28%)
Tesla 9. TSLA: $10.9 billion (1.25%)
Meta Platforms (META): $10.7 billion (1.23%)
Alphabet Class C Shares (GOOG): $9.1 billion (1.05%)
Source: Goldman Sachs Q1 2026 13F Report
According to the latest 13F report, Goldman Sachs manages a large 13F portfolio with assets under management (AUM) exceeding $870.9 billion.
Because Goldman Sachs files as an integrated institutional investment manager, the portfolio represents a collection of U.S.-listed stocks, options, and ETFs managed by multiple Goldman Sachs entities.
Goldman Sachs' top ten holdings account for 20.41% of its total 13F portfolio.
Nvidia is the largest holding in Goldman Sachs' portfolio, accounting for 3.62% of its total 13F holdings, with a market value exceeding $31.5 billion. Apple ranked second with a market capitalization of $27 billion, and SPY ranked third with a market capitalization exceeding $23.8 billion.
Other top ten holdings included Microsoft, Alphabet Class A shares, Amazon, Broadcom, Tesla, Meta Platforms, and Alphabet Class C shares.
About Goldman Sachs:
Goldman Sachs is an American multinational investment bank and financial services firm founded in 1869. By revenue, it is the world's largest investment bank and the world's seventh-largest asset manager, managing over $3.6 trillion in assets.
Why Jake Amsterdam’s role could help NovaRed stand
NovaRed Mining’s latest update is the appointment of Jake Amsterdam as Strategic Advisor, and I think the market may be underestimating why this matters.
A lot of junior mining names sound the same. They all talk about exploration, critical minerals, future demand, supply chains, and upside. The problem is that most of them struggle to separate themselves. NovaRed’s move here looks like an attempt to build a more credible and polished corporate identity around responsible resource development.
Amsterdam’s background is not typical mining promotion fluff. He works with Amsterdam & Partners LLP, a law, advocacy, and geopolitics firm operating out of Washington, DC and London. His listed experience includes public-policy disputes, human-rights matters, anti-corruption cases, investigations, political advocacy, strategic communications, and report-driven advocacy.
That is meaningful because critical minerals are becoming deeply political. Governments care about supply chains. Investors care about ESG. Communities care about transparency. Institutions care about governance. If NovaRed wants to be taken seriously in that environment, having someone focused on ESG positioning, responsible critical-minerals strategy, stakeholder engagement, and reputation management is a smart move.
From a stock perspective, this does not replace the need for project updates, financing progress, or technical results. But it can improve the company’s narrative quality. In small-cap mining, narrative matters because attention is scarce and trust is even scarcer.
The positive angle is that NovaRed appears to be building the soft infrastructure around the business. Better governance messaging, better stakeholder strategy, and better reputation management can help reduce perceived risk over time.
This is not a “buy because advisor” situation. It is more like a quiet credibility upgrade. If future news starts connecting this appointment to partnerships, permitting progress, ESG reports, or investor outreach, then this could become more important than it looks today.
Do you prefer boring businesses with upside optionality?
I’m gradually becoming less interested in flashy concept names and more interested in businesses that at least have some operational foundation.
TROO caught my eye partly because it doesn’t look like a pure narrative story.
Am I the only one shifting this way?
Sandisk flashes investors uncommon technical signal.
This is not a normal company, normal financial rules do not apply - with sandisk ... The high RSI is because of insane revenue
How long will it take for MU to break through $2,000?
As an investor, I have recently been closely monitoring the performance of Micron Technology (Ticker: MU). Given its pivotal position within the semiconductor industry coupled with the market's sustained demand for memory chips and storage solutions many are beginning to speculate on whether MU's share price could eventually break the $2,000 mark.
Whether MU can indeed surpass $2,000 in the near term hinges primarily on its own operational performance as well as the broader market environment. While potential challenges certainly exist, the stock retains the potential to achieve such a breakthrough, particularly given the favorable outlook for the industry.
What are your thoughts on MU's future share price trajectory? How long do you think it will take for the stock to reach the $2,000 milestone? I invite you to share your views and join the discussion in the comments section below!
Stocks with identity problems are weirdly interesting
Sometimes the market doesn’t know whether to treat something as growth, value, turnaround, or pure speculation. That confusion can create weird opportunities.
$TROO seems to sit in that awkward middle zone.
How do you guys actually start researching a stock?
I’m currently holding a couple long term stocks for investing and trading a few around in my portfolio as I think that’s a good split for me.
However I noticed that even when making choices I just quickly scan through a company’s statements and earnings and make some connections then pull the trigger.
But then I’d be holding that stock for a few months to years so that makes me wonder how much should and how should I go about researching a security?
Any details are appreciated and your methods and process is more than welcome to be shared.