r/SEO_LLM

Has anyone here compared peec ai against AthenHQ? I’m an agency owner looking for a GEO tool to handle client reporting. With Athena I find the credit-based pricing for AI responses a bit confusing. For those who have used it, is it scalable? How much does the enterprise plan tend to cost? We’re evaluating Peec as well but I’d really like to hear from people who have been using these two tools for a while now before we start building out our GEO services around them.

https://preview.redd.it/crbjl0mf8xwg1.jpg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=159d0ccadcca2e265c4b6c5f4693f6ddf52a6929

My dog is an SEO expert, but does not want to invest in Listicles
What should I do?

I was trying to inspect what LLMs actually search before answering, not just the final output.

So I built a browser bookmarklet that opens a separate terminal-style view and shows:

• grounding/fan-out queries
• domain-scoped vs open-web searches
• cited domains that survive into the final answer
• source concentration across retrieved results

It currently works with:

• ChatGPT live conversations
• Claude live conversations, with JSON import fallback when live access is not available

The main reason I built it was for SEO/GEO/retrieval debugging. In a lot of cases, the interesting part is not the answer itself but:

• what queries the model fanned out into
• whether it used explicit site constraints
• which domains kept surfacing
• which sources actually made it into the response

I’m posting this mainly to get feedback on the approach:

• would you inspect anything else in the retrieval chain?
• what would you want to export?
• would Gemini/AI Mode support be useful?

If people are interested, I can share the repo in the comments (but i don't even know if i can post link here...)

spent way too long this week looking at my marketing spend and feeling nothing.

paid ads — burning money to rent attention i don't own. SEO — 6 months minimum before anything moves, and even then you're at Google's mercy every algorithm update.

but here's the thing nobody's really talking about yet: a massive chunk of purchase decisions are now starting with an AI query. not "best project management tool site:google.com" — just "hey what's a good project management tool" typed into ChatGPT. and whatever shows up there? that's organic, that's trusted, and you didn't pay a cent for it.

that's basically what GEO is. making sure your brand exists in the layer that LLMs draw from when making recommendations. structured content, citations, directory presence, brand mentions across sources these models actually trust. you build the signals once, they compound. no bidding wars, no algorithm updates wiping you out overnight.

the current tooling in this space though is either stupidly expensive or just throws a dashboard at you showing you're invisible with zero guidance on what to actually do about it. cool graph, very sad, thanks.

so i'm building RankSearch — it tracks your AI visibility across platforms AND actually helps you improve it. blog generation, FAQ optimization, directory submissions, comparison pages, brand mention seeding — the whole pipeline, not just the score.

still work in progress honestly, but i put up a landing page breaking down everything we're building if you're curious, check the comments for it :)

not asking you to pay anything, just want to know if this resonates with other founders before we go heads down on the MVP.

would love to hear if anyone's already thinking about GEO or if this still feels too early

Do you need to worry about how your company appears in the top AI chatbots?

We looked at our own data and the answer was a little surprising.

Check out the latest blogs on our website at the Pureinsights website.

https://preview.redd.it/3tf5frcxeswg1.jpg?width=512&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36447964cecf11fbd61b83e52b347a177d0e55fd

I'm developing and testing a series of prompts for local SEO. Please consider this one, which is dedicated to optimizing the services section of your Google My Business Profile:

Go to my GBP at [URL] and competitors [URL1], [URL2], [URL3]. Extract every service listed and whether it has a description. Cross-reference against my website at [URL] and flag: services I offer that aren’t in my GBP, services with no description, and services where my description is weaker than competitors. Then write optimized 40–60 word descriptions for all my services: [service1], [service2], [service3]. Each one should naturally include the service keyword, mention a service area, and name a specific outcome customers get.

What do you think?