r/LiberalUS

🔥 Hot ▲ 7.3k r/LiberalUS+2 crossposts

Va Supreme Court Justice D. Arthur Kelsey just voted against redistricting

The vote was 4-3 and so he decided it. His term ends Jan 2027. Let's make sure he isn't getting reappointed. Call your State Legislator today!

u/APence — 5 days ago
▲ 1.5k r/LiberalUS+8 crossposts

Trump Says He Will Send An ‘Election Integrity Army’ Into Every State For Midterms | The Independent

May 10, 2026 - Excerpt

President Donald Trump announced Sunday that Republicans plan to dispense a large “Election Integrity Army” to every single state for the 2026 midterms – invoking his debunked claims that the United States does not have fair elections. 

In a message on his Truth Social platform the president appeared to attribute his “Historic Election in 2024” to the fact that the Republican National Committee sent thousands of volunteers across the country to poll watch or assist with election litigation through a volunteer program.

“During my Historic Election in 2024, when I won every single Swing State, and decisively won both the Electoral and Popular votes by wide margins, the Republicans had an Election Integrity Army in every single State to preserve the sanctity of each legal vote. We will be doing the same again in 2026, but it will be much bigger and stronger,” Trump wrote.

Trump did not elaborate on who would be part of the “Election Integrity Army” or how large it would be.

But his announcement is reminiscent of familiar claims he made in the run-up to the 2024 presidential race in which he planted seeds of doubt on the validity of U.S. election – seemingly dependent on the outcome.

the-independent.com
u/Annisty — 2 days ago
▲ 3.0k r/LiberalUS+5 crossposts

Canada/USA - The System Is Not Broken. It Is Working Exactly as Designed

When Shawn Fain says we are at our worst point in history on wealth inequality, the instinct in polite circles is to argue the data. To soften it. To contextualize it. To pretend this is just another cycle that will correct itself.

It is not.

What Fain is describing is not a fluctuation. It is the logical endpoint of a system that has spent four decades transferring risk downward and reward upward. If you have lived inside that system, not as an observer but as a participant, you do not need a chart to recognize it. You can feel it in the way contracts are negotiated, in the way wages stagnate while productivity climbs, in the way entire sectors quietly normalize precarity as a business model.

The modern economy does not fail loudly. It fails quietly, through design choices that accumulate over time. Trade liberalization without labour protections. Financialization that prioritizes shareholder value above all else. Tax structures that reward capital over work. None of this is accidental. It is policy.

The result is a widening gap that no longer hides behind averages. The top tier is not just pulling ahead. It is operating in a different reality entirely. Asset ownership compounds. Access compounds. Influence compounds. Meanwhile, the majority are told to measure success in survival metrics. Can you cover rent. Can you absorb a shock. Can you retire without collapsing back into the workforce.

What makes this moment different is not just the scale of inequality. It is the visibility of it. Social media, alternative media, independent journalism. The distance between how people live and how they are told the system works is no longer abstract. It is documented daily. That exposure changes the equation. It turns private frustration into collective awareness.

Fain’s comments land because they cut through the language that usually protects the system. He is not speaking as an academic. He is speaking from within a labour movement that sees the outcomes directly. Negotiations that once revolved around incremental gains now revolve around clawing back ground that was lost years ago. That alone tells you the direction of travel.

There will be those who argue that conditions today are still better than in previous eras. That absolute poverty has declined. That innovation has improved quality of life. All of that can be true and still miss the point. Inequality at this scale is not just an economic issue. It is a structural one. It reshapes power.

When wealth concentrates, decision making follows. Policy follows. Media narratives follow. Over time, the system begins to insulate itself from the people it is supposed to serve. That is where the real fracture begins. Not in statistics, but in legitimacy.

From a Canadian perspective, there is a tendency to treat this as an American problem. It is not. The same pressures exist here, just expressed with a different tone. Housing costs that detach from income. Wage growth that lags behind inflation. Public services stretched to the point where access becomes uneven. The architecture is similar even if the branding is different.

What Fain has done, intentionally or not, is strip the conversation down to its core. If this is the worst point in history for wealth inequality, then the question is no longer whether the system needs adjustment. It is whether the system, as currently structured, can produce a different outcome at all.

Because if it cannot, then what we are living through is not a temporary imbalance. It is a stable configuration. And stable configurations do not change without strikes and other asymmetric economic pressures applied by regular working people.

That is the part no one wants to say out loud.

GC

u/AirRegular6234 — 7 days ago
▲ 437 r/LiberalUS+4 crossposts

There is a moment when corruption stops being a scandal and becomes a system. The United States crossed that line years ago. What we are witnessing now is not a series of isolated grifts tied to Donald Trump and his orbit. It is something far more dangerous. It is normalization. It is industrial scale monetization of public office.

Trump did not invent corruption. He optimized it.

The mythology around Trump has always been that of the outsider businessman who disrupted politics. That story collapses under even minimal scrutiny. What he actually disrupted was the old etiquette of corruption. Previous administrations obscured it behind think tanks, speaking fees, post office lobbying careers. Trump removed the mask. He turned the presidency into a live demonstration of transactional power.

Access became currency. Loyalty became invoiceable.

Start with the simplest mechanism. Branding. The Trump name was not just a symbol. It was a toll booth. Foreign governments, corporate actors, and political hopefuls understood quickly that proximity to the brand translated into influence. Hotel bookings, licensing deals, real estate partnerships. These were not passive business activities. They were signals. Payments dressed as commerce.

The Trump International Hotel in Washington became a case study in plain sight. Diplomats and lobbyists did not stay there for the décor. They stayed because it was understood. Money spent there was not hospitality. It was communication.

Then came the family.

The line between public office and private enrichment did not blur. It was erased. Jared Kushner moved through Middle Eastern diplomacy while simultaneously building relationships that later intersected with massive investment flows. Ivanka Trump occupied a senior advisory role while maintaining business interests that benefited from global visibility tied directly to US policy posture. Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump operated the business empire while openly leveraging political capital as a marketing engine.

This was not subtle. It was structural.

Critics often treat these as ethical violations. That framing is too small. What emerged was a feedback loop. Political power increased brand value. Brand value attracted capital. Capital reinforced political influence. Round and round.

Then there is the ecosystem around him.

Cabinet officials, advisers, and aligned politicians did not merely tolerate this environment. Many adapted to it. The incentives were clear. Align with the centre of gravity and benefit. Whether through consulting arrangements, media platforms, book deals, or post office opportunities, the message was consistent. Loyalty pays.

Congress, for its part, performed outrage when necessary and silence when profitable. Insider trading controversies did not disappear. They multiplied. Legislative timing and market movement began to look less like coincidence and more like pattern. Pandemic era trades exposed just how comfortable elected officials had become treating privileged information as an asset class.

The grift expanded beyond individuals into movements.

Political action committees, fundraising vehicles, and legal defence funds became financial black boxes. Donations surged on the back of outrage narratives, election denial claims, and legal battles. Where the money ultimately flowed often remained opaque. What mattered was the scale. Millions became hundreds of millions. Anger became revenue.

Even the concept of truth became monetized.

Media ecosystems aligned with Trump learned quickly that outrage drives engagement and engagement drives profit. Conspiracy adjacent narratives were not accidents. They were business models. The more destabilizing the claim, the more valuable the audience.
This is where the system reveals itself fully.

It is not just Trump. It is the network effect.

Allies, opportunists, ideologues, and profiteers all feeding into the same cycle. Each scandal that would have once ended a career instead became content. Each investigation became a fundraising pitch. Each accusation became proof, to supporters, of persecution rather than misconduct.

There is a psychological shift underpinning all of this.

When corruption is constant, it becomes background noise. When every accusation is framed as partisan attack, accountability loses meaning. The public does not resolve the contradiction. It adapts to it. Cynicism replaces outrage. And cynicism is the perfect environment for sustained exploitation because it lowers expectations to zero.

The most dangerous part is not the money. It is the precedent.

Trump demonstrated that the guardrails of American democracy are not laws. They are norms. And norms, once broken repeatedly without consequence, do not repair themselves. They decay.

What follows is not a return to integrity. It is escalation.

Future political actors, watching this playbook, are not learning what not to do. They are learning what is possible. They are learning that the risk is low, the rewards are high, and the public can be conditioned to accept it.

This is no longer about one man or one administration. It is about a system that has proven it can be captured, monetized, and sustained.

The United States is not being governed.

It is being leveraged.

GC

Sources
CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington) reports on Trump properties and conflicts of interest

U.S. House Oversight Committee investigations and reports (2019–2024)

U.S. Senate Ethics and Intelligence Committee reports
New York State Attorney General civil case filings and rulings on Trump Organization

The New York Times reporting on Trump taxes and business dealings

The Washington Post reporting on Trump International Hotel and foreign spending

ProPublica investigations into political fundraising and dark money networks

Federal Election Commission filings and campaign finance disclosures

OpenSecrets (Center for Responsive Politics) data on political donations and lobbying

Pandora Papers and Paradise Papers investigative journalism consortium reports

Major media investigations into Jared Kushner investment funds and foreign financing

Congressional STOCK Act disclosures and financial transaction reports by lawmakers

u/Important_Lock_2238 — 7 days ago
▲ 125 r/LiberalUS+6 crossposts

WAREHOUSES

PROFITS

DEATHS

ICE expands

Corporations cash in

Americans normalize mass detention

History repeats when fear becomes policy

G

u/Important_Lock_2238 — 3 days ago
▲ 116 r/LiberalUS+2 crossposts

The reporter expresses frustration that Congress is taking another break. Meuser counters that it’s a “district work week” rather than a vacation, asserting that they’re returning home to work for their constituents. The reporter specifically highlights the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and TSA funding, mentioning that employees might go without pay. Meuser insists they’re doing their best to pass the bill but blames the narrow Republican majority and Democratic opposition for the delays. As the reporter continues to press him on the optics of leaving while workers face pay uncertainty, Meuser’s patience wears thin. He accuses the reporter of being disrespectful and tells him to stop talking to him. The interaction concludes with Meuser telling the reporter to “talk to the fucking Democrats” before walking away and entering a gated area.

Talk to the fucking democrats?!

u/hellosteve_ — 13 days ago