r/IndianTeenagers_pol

Day 1.

As the younger and educated generation of India, it’s our responsibility to think carefully about whom we vote for during elections.

Today, voting is often influenced by media, religion, caste, or emotional narratives. But this cannot continue forever if we truly want a better country.

We need to develop a better way of choosing our representatives.

Personally, I feel voting only based on the “face” of the Prime Minister is not the right approach. Even a great Prime Minister alone cannot transform a nation. Real development also depends on strong local representatives who improve our own surroundings, solve local issues, and work honestly for the people. A developed locality eventually contributes to a developed nation.

There are many sources online where we can read about politicians, their education, criminal records, and background. But the bigger question is: how should we evaluate that information?

For example, what if one candidate is highly educated but has many criminal cases, while another candidate is less educated but has a clean image and no serious cases?

Personally, I would prefer someone with a cleaner image and fewer cases over someone highly educated with many serious allegations. My ideal preference would be:

Clean image + educated > slightly less educated with minor civil cases > highly educated person with serious criminal cases.

At the end of the day, honesty, accountability, and intention to serve people matter more than degrees alone.

What do you all think about this?

What is this r/kashmiri sub even about at this point?

Saw a post literally calling the Kashmiri pandits exodus “just migration” and trying to justify targeting by labeling people as supporters, like.. what? You don’t have to agree on every label, but downplaying fear, threats, and displacement like that isn’t discussion it’s straight up distortion, cherry picking numbers, removing context, and then acting like you’ve set the narrative straight doesn’t make it truth. At this point it just feels like anything can be twisted to fit a narrative and passed off as a different perspective. If this is what passes as discussion here, then it’s not a discussion space, it’s an echo chamber. KPs weren’t outsiders, they were their own people.