r/Hasan_Piker

https://www.thetoc.gr/diethni/article/march-to-gaza-greece-to-israil-anoixe-pur-enantion-ton-aktibiston-tou-global-sumud-flotilla-binteo/

Seriously, though, this night could not have gone any better for PA-3. I was genuinely worried when it was a neck-and-neck race for so long—waiting for the next big poll drop felt like hours. When I saw on Decision Desk that Chris Rabb shot up ahead of the pack, I genuinely could not believe it. I was jumping up and down with excitement!

The Democratic Tea Party Express is here, and it is rocketing out of the station to exciting new destinations. The Feckless Democratic Establishment has the money, BUT WE HAVE THE PEOPLE! The DSA is here to stay, and so are the many victories we will have along the way. This is our party now.

The Pro-Israel, Pro Fascist Collaborator side of the Democratic Party is COOKED. We have the motion, and we have the floor. Voting is certainly not the only way to defeat fascism, but to have an opposition party, we need to vote out every single feckless Dem there is and have thousands of Zohran's across the country!

TLDR: THE PEOPLE! UNITED! WILL NEVER BE DEFEATED!

EDIT: I APOLOGIZE I CANT READ - this is in response to an individual petition, not a legal document. That said, it's still an official document, and represent great progress.

To implement the provisions of laws such as the Constitution, the Civil Code, and the Employment Promotion Law, and to effectively safeguard citizens' personal dignity against infringement, the Supreme People's Court hereby clarifies the following adjudication rules: First, regarding cases involving the public insult or defamation of an individual's sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, people's courts generally deem such acts to constitute an infringement of general personality rights; they order the cessation of the infringement, a formal apology, and compensation for emotional distress, thereby explicitly establishing the illegality of discriminatory speech and conduct based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. Second, in the contexts of recruitment, hiring, job reassignment, or dismissal, should an employer engage in differential treatment on the grounds of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, people's courts shall, in accordance with the law, determine that the employer has committed employment discrimination; they shall order the revocation of the relevant decisions, compensation for losses, and other remedies, thereby explicitly prohibiting unreasonable discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression within the sphere of employment. Third, should a school impose inappropriate disciplinary measures against students—or fail to fulfill its administrative duties, thereby leading to campus bullying—on the grounds of the students' sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, people's courts shall, in accordance with the law, hold the school liable, thereby reinforcing schools' obligation to protect students' personal liberty and dignity. These cases collectively demonstrate the people's courts' unequivocal stance: that the legitimate rights and interests of sexual minorities are entitled to equal protection under the law, and that any unreasonable discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression is strictly prohibited by law. ... Moving forward, we will continue to systematically review cases nationwide involving the protection of sexual minorities' rights and interests, summarize adjudication rules, and standardize adjudication criteria. At appropriate junctures, we will formalize established adjudication rules through various mechanisms—such as judicial interpretations, conference minutes, guiding cases, reference cases, and exemplary cases—to enhance the provision of legal norms. Furthermore, we will incorporate topics such as the protection of personality rights into judicial training programs, thereby ensuring the protection of citizens' personal liberty and dignity in accordance with the law.” — *Reply to the "Proposal on the Application of Law to Explicitly Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Judicial Adjudication"*

Just refreshed to see this. Feeling hopeful. Too bad Hasan had to end the stream!

Sure, MAGA is a cult but pretending 15 million dollars from AIPAC had no effect is psychotic.

The ICC prosecutor has filed a secret request for an arrest warrant against Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. The charges include forced displacement of Palestinians, transfer of Israeli settlers into occupied territory, persecution, and apartheid. If approved by the judges, it would be the first arrest warrant ever issued by an international court specifically for the crime of apartheid.

Note the distinction: this is an application, not an issued warrant. The pre-trial chamber still has to review the evidence and decide whether "reasonable grounds" exist. That process could take months.

Smotrich's response at a press conference today was this: "Issuing an arrest warrant for the Prime Minister is a declaration of war. Issuing an arrest warrant for the Defense Minister and the Finance Minister is a declaration of war. We will respond to a declaration of war with war."

Think about that framing for a moment. A court investigating alleged war crimes is the aggressor. A minister facing accusations of forcibly displacing civilians is the victim. The institution designed to hold individuals accountable for crimes against humanity is, in his words, antisemitic.

This is the same minister who said in 2024 that starving two million Palestinian civilians in Gaza might be "justified and moral." The ICC apparently agrees that's worth investigating.