
r/CryptoCurrency

Are ltc and xrp sol are legit cryptos?
Other than cryptos that trying to make money off people are these reliable coins?
Has Crypto Changed Your Mindset Too?
Everyone talks about making money in crypto, but nobody talks enough about the mental side of it.
The patience during crashes.
The fear of missing out.
The regret after selling too early.
The stress of checking charts every hour.
At some point, crypto stops being only about profits and starts teaching psychology, discipline, patience, and emotional control.
I honestly feel crypto changes the way people think over time — sometimes for better, sometimes for worse.
Do you think being in crypto has changed your mindset as a person?
Is there still a realistic 10x case for Bitcoin?
I have been hodling BTC since 2013. Unfortunately, not enough to change my life!
These days, I feel caught between two worlds:
- Sometimes I think Bitcoin has had a good run, but now it is just another investment, with a fairly symmetric risk/reward profile.
- Other times, I think the world is going crazy and Bitcoin is the only way out.
What do you guys think could cause another 10x run? Do you think there is one coming?
Edit: Funny how asking a question that isn’t based on “the price will just keep going up forever” doesn’t seem to get many upvotes here.
Daily Crypto Discussion - May 19, 2026 (GMT+0)
Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.
Disclaimer:
Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.
Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.
Rules:
- All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
- Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
- Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
- Comments will be sorted by newest first.
Useful Links:
- Beginner Resources
- Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs 🌔
- MOONs Wiki Page
- r/CryptoCurrency Discord
- r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
- Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
- r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.
Finding Other Discussion Threads
Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.
- u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
- u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
- u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
- u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.
Needing to deposit USD into Coinbase before I can receive USDT? Does this sound right?
I am owed a pretty huge debt, and the debtor's employee wants to pay me back in USDT. I don't do crypto, but in order to get the money returned to me, I opened a Coinbase account today. The debtor's employee said, "You have to deposit $1000 on USDT for activation to get a domain trading account capable of receiving mainnet transfer funds."
Um. What the heck does this mean? I thought I could just set up my account and receive the USDT. Thought this was going to be simple. Not sure this guy knows what he is talking about.
South Korean Funeral Company Faces $33M Unrealized Loss on Leveraged Ether ETFs
cointelegraph.comDo you think BTC is only good for holding, even after all these years?
Do you still think BTC is only good for holding after all these years?
Curious how people see Bitcoin today compared to previous cycles. Is it still just about holding, or do you think there are long-term use cases that will actually last and grow over time?
Just want to know if people here also see other long-term possibilities for BTC aside from just holding it...
the clarity act just passed committee 15-9 and somehow two democrats actually voted for it
this is the first time in YEARS that crypto legislation with actual teeth made it out of committee with bipartisan support. gallego and alsobrooks broke ranks. in 2026.
while elizabeth warren is filing 40+ amendments to try to kill it before floor vote
the bill literally just creates jurisdictional clarity between SEC and CFTC so we stop having this insane situation where nobody knows if their token is a security until gary gensler decides to sue them five years later. thats it. thats the whole thing. and it took congress until now to figure this out
but now warrens got 100+ amendments queued up and you KNOW half of them are gonna be poison pills designed to either tank the bill or make it so useless that it doesnt matter.
“yield bearing stablecoins must register as securities” type stuff that just brings us back to regulation by enforcement the cynical read is this dies in floor vote or gets amended into irrelevance.
the optimistic read is that if it made it out of committee with dems crossing over then maybe theres actually enough votes to pass something. institutional money has been screaming for this framework since the ETFs launched
either way the next few weeks are gonna show whether the US is actually gonna build coherent crypto policy or if were just gonna keep pretending that 1930s securities law works for programmable money in 2026
also someone remind me why we needed a decade and multiple exchange collapses to get to “maybe CFTC and SEC should have defined boundaries” because that seems like something we couldve figured out in like 2017
Metamask swap is a scam, be careful.
I swapped a total 37,028 of wOCT from my wallet to 2010 USDT swap on chain.
This was the executed transaction tx:
https://etherscan.io/tx/0x98724339b603a0158aab2f7a2a350ff47f8501f0bbb49e946a6f8d84eb7fc5ad
Instead of receiving my funds, I was only sent ~$1,576 USDT. When I checked the on-chain data, it clearly showed that the swap successfully executed for the full $2,010. However, the platform's smart contract deliberately routed $421.80 USDT straight into one of their own wallets:
0xd0A67cB08BE17475f4315a04C5F0Be3e200Ef66c
This is deceiving users, providing them with false information and stealing funds without disclosing.
I contacted support and they replied with:
“ 1:1 exchange rate for an asset pair is not guaranteed when trading on a decentralized market with limited liquidity. If the market for the token pair lacks sufficient liquidity, trading can result in a significant price impact, which leads to a lesser fiat value of the received token.”
When I asked customer support, they tried to brush it off by blaming "low liquidity" and "price impact." This is a blatant lie. The blockchain proves there was no price impact issue, the full amount was generated, and they simply pocketed a massive, undisclosed 20% cut. Providing false information to cover up hidden extractions is theft. Stay away.
Hey everyone,
I’m building a closed-beta market intelligence dashboard and I’m trying to get feedback from people who actively follow crypto markets.
I want to be clear upfront: this is not financial advice, not copy trading, not trade execution, and not a “buy/sell signal” service.
The problem I’m trying to solve is more about workflow.
Crypto traders and investors usually have information scattered across a bunch of places:
- exchange/watchlist app
- TradingView or charting tools
- X/Reddit/Discord/Telegram sentiment
- macro news
- BTC/ETH dominance and market structure
- funding/open interest data
- notes or spreadsheets
- alerts that often lack context
I’m trying to build something that organizes market context better, especially around:
- what moved
- why it might be moving
- whether there is a catalyst or just noise
- what risk/context matters
- what would invalidate the setup
- what to review later
The goal is not to tell people what to buy. The goal is to make market research and watchlist tracking cleaner.
A few questions for people here:
- What crypto market information do you check every day?
- What makes a dashboard/tool useful vs. just another noisy “signals” product?
- Do you care more about alerts, watchlist context, funding/open interest, news catalysts, or post-trade review?
- Would confidence/risk labels be useful if they are explained clearly, or would that make you distrust the tool?
- What do you currently use to track why a coin/token is on your watchlist?
I’m mostly looking for blunt feedback before inviting more beta users.
Contributors are leaving the Ethereum Foundation
cryptopolitan.comCapital B Acquires 192 BTC for $15.2M, Lifts Holdings to 3,135 BTC
coinmarketcap.comIs the AI Race, Datacenter construction, and the push to cloud computing a 51% attack on the bitcoin blockchain network by the powers that be?
I was watching a video on a bitcoin lottery device and the video included a brief technical explanation of the blockchain network. One line made me realise that there is an underlying assumption, which, at the time of creation, in 2009, could not have accounted for the global changes and tech trends in terms of compute.
So, I ask;
Is the AI Race, Datacenter construction, and the push to cloud computing a 51% attack on the bitcoin blockchain network by the powers that be?
https://youtu.be/2UM4j1_xEs0?si=4k3Qvh1xoxkUjr_f&t=94
"Whenver there are competing versions of the ledger, the network always trusts the longest chain.
Why does this work?
Because to forge a fraudulent version of the ledger, an attacker would need to produce more computation than all the rest of the network combined.
In practice that would require them controlling more than half of the worlds computing power which is effectively impossible."
The moment he finished this sentence, I was hit with a flash and immediately made the connection to the current push by big tech, building massive, no, collosal AI data-centers, utilising GPUs and Networking, (the same architecture as bitcoin mining) and likewise, the push for consumers to 'rent' everything from the cloud, moving away from individuals posessing their own powerful hardware.
Think "You'll own nothing and be happy" courtesy of the WEF (World Economic Forum).
Now, an open question I pose is, are these two trends in technology and economics actually a concerted attempt to seize control of the majority of the world's compute by a handful of companies, (serving the same, central interests), rivalling the collective masses of indiviudals in terms of compute, thus enabling a '51% attack' on the bitcoin network, and effectively destroying the bitcoin and cryptocurrency ecosystem, and thus the incredible benefits and power they afford to private individuals?
Could the AI hype, indeed be a bubble, and marketing, in service of feeding a massive inflow of investment, ultimately into the construction of datacenters, putting massive GPU compute into the hands of centralised corporate interests, and, once everything is in place, the rug will be pulled, AI will go offline, and a 51% attack on the bitcoin network will occur?
This post is one a bit more technical in nature, and takes seriously the topic involved, so, it might not be for everyone, just those with an understanding in blockchain, bitcoin, and compute.
I lost money this week and it wasn't even a scam
I lost money twice in the same week. Not to a rug. Not to a hack. To my own wallet.
First time — I was managing like six addresses across three chains, I could literally feel my adrenaline 😭. A new L1 just dropped and the chart was going crazy. So I copy an address, I send and I was waiting for conformation on the other chain but unfortunately after checking again it was the wrong one. And my funds where gone just like that. The wallet didn't flinch. No warning. Just a little confirmation tick like it was proud of itself. It was my fault, I know but sending money shouldn't require me to have a cs degree, understanding chains and stuff. Crypto wasn't correctly built for humans, I'm sure you agree with me 😭.
Second time — same week, same opportunity. My friend is newer to this. He had funds sitting across four different chains but couldn't move fast enough because half of it was stuck — wrong network, not enough gas on another, bridge taking 20 minutes. By the time we figured it out, the window was closed. He had the money. He just couldn't use it.
We both got wrecked by the tooling instead of the market 😂.
I've been quietly thinking about what a wallet looks like if it was actually built for humans. Like what if the chain was just nobody's problem but the app's. You own your keys, you move your money, and the complexity just... disappears underneath. Wild concept, I know.
Not launching anything. Not shilling anything. Just curious — what's the most unhinged thing a wallet has made you do just to complete a basic transaction?
Ask me what I'm building if you're curious 👽