r/AskConservatives

Why does your side paint AOC as dumb/stupid/dimwitted etc?

Like her policies or not, or even her personality, she's not stupid. She graduated with honors from a very prestigious school with a double major in international relations and economics. I often see your side take shots at her for bartending, but why? Tons of people in the service industry are doing it to pay bills while working on getting a job in their chosen field.

Which brings me to as well, I thought you guys were supposed to be the party of the 'non-elites.' If that's the case, why shit on someone for working as a bartender?

So, why do you guys think she's 'low IQ?' If you're going to hate her, hate her for something real like her policies, not because 'she's a dumb bartender.'

thank you for your attention to this matter.

reddit.com
u/the_anxiety_haver — 14 hours ago

What do you make of Mayor Mamdami balancing NYC budget in under a year (without raising pro?

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/nyc-budget-zohran-mamdani-property-taxes/

From the article:

- It was partially due to the Pierre tax on second homes for Uber wealthy.

- about 40% is from efficiencies to the NYC governmental office (this including layoffs and redendancy). Basically a doge style attempt. Side potentially a model for small governmental bodies.

- Roughly 40% was from a 4 billion fund from the NYC state.

- about 15% was through not filling job vacancy and closing them (trimming government fat).

Edit: fixing banner

Property taxes.

Do Conservatives oppose universal healthcare on principle, more than practicality?

Create a magical scenario where the US government could implement a universal healthcare model without driving up taxes, blowing up the budget, or whatever other fiscal requirements you would require for it to be a good decision.

Would you still oppose it purely based on principle, since it’s not an enumerated power on the Constitution?

I ask because a lot of the conversations around UHC get into the weeds about the costs.

Dems tend to point out that the aggregate of everything we pay for healthcare now (premiums, deductibles, OOP expenses, out-of-network charges) amounts to costing more than the cost of UHC would be, so even if your taxes go up, other expenses go down and you actually end up paying less for healthcare than you would with the current model.

Conservatives tend to point out our massive debt, being forced to pay for the health care of others, and the government taking more money out of their paychecks.

So am I correct that the objection is based on principle? i.e:

It’s not specifically enumerated as a power of the federal government in the constitution.

Opposed to any socialist policies, especially if it benefits “freeloaders”.

It’s anti free-market.

“Forcing” others to work (still don’t get that one, since doctors and hospitals would still be getting paid).

Government telling you what you must do with your money.

Any others that aren’t currently on the top of my head.

So is there any scenario in the US specifically where conservatives would support and push for UHC?

reddit.com
u/ReamusLQ — 10 hours ago

Why do you think that, despite making much less money than the average American and having a worse economy, people who live in Europe tend to be much happier?

Not just happier but having a better quality of life and life expectancy.

reddit.com
u/Gym_frere — 18 hours ago

What specifically is it that would change about America that scares you if we became much more progressive?

This is a very genuine question. As someone who has been on the left my whole life, I’ve truly just never understood why many conservatives fear the country becoming more progressive.

I guess I just don’t really understand what changes would come about that would be a net negative enough that it makes people feel as though moving at all to the left is going to decimate our country. Obviously I view ideals to the right as more harmful (in my own personal opinion) but I would like to hear how you actually believe progressive ideology would play out in this country and what are the specific things that would change that scares you the most?

reddit.com
u/MissHannahJ — 5 days ago

Unless Republicans Make Major Changes In The Other Direction, How Bad Do You Think The Midterms Will Be For Them (Read Description)?

Many, many, many news outlets basically say they are facing the following:

- Very blue environment

- Gas prices nearing $4.5 average and could be $5 around midterms

- New reporting of a nearly 70% disapproval of Trump's handling of the economy

- Much worse approval overall than his approval at the same time in his first term around now, instead of ~8-10 points underwater, nearly 20-23 points underwater, including a near-vast majority of Independents disliking him -- and those midterms were historic House losses of 40+ seats for Republicans in 2018

- Nearly only 2 in 5 Americans approve of him.

- Historically, the party in power's voters come out less frequently during midterms because they are less motivated to vote. Not guaranteed, but likely to happen again.

- Even if you don't like polls, it's not really about one poll or another, it's about a pattern of hundreds to thousands of reports of this telling the same story across news outlets of multiple partisanships / completely non-partisan...

reddit.com
u/Zipper222222 — 14 hours ago

Is this how you thought the Iran conflict would go?

We're now into the 10th week of the conflict with Iran and the prospect of obtaining a lasting end to it has been elusive. For those who continue to support this conflict, no longer support it, or never supported it, is this what you expected would happen?

reddit.com
u/G_H_2023 — 3 days ago

Democrats lost 2.1M registered voters (2020–2024) and Independents hit record 45%. Were you one of them?

According to a detailed New York Times analysis of voter registration data from the 30 states + D.C. that track party affiliation:

- Between 2020 and 2024, Democrats lost ground to Republicans in every single one of those states.

- Democrats lost 2.1 million registered voters while Republicans gained 2.4 million.

- Gallup’s 2025 full-year data shows a record-high 45% of Americans identify as political independents (up from 43% in 2024), with Democrats and Republicans tied at 27% each.

A lot of the coverage notes that the drop in Democratic registrations is feeding directly into the independent/unaffiliated column (and some into Republican).

So my questions for you all: Are many of you (or conservatives you know) included in those numbers - meaning former registered Democrats who switched to Republican, went independent, or simply stopped identifying as Dem? If yes, what were the biggest reasons you left the Democratic Party?

I’m genuinely curious about the “why” from the conservative side. Not looking for a debate, just your honest takes.

Thanks in advance!

reddit.com
u/July_Seventeen — 10 hours ago

Who will be the Republican nominee in 2028 ?

REPORTER: Why do you think Trump brings up you or Marco Rubio running for president in 2028?

VP JD VANCE: "I just don't think it sounds like the President of the United States to have a televised competition for who would succeed him as his apprentice!"

Choosing the next president shouldn’t look like a reality show where contestants compete for approval.

This is what Vance was trying to communicate. This is the first time Vance has revealed himself by taking a tiny dig at trump.

reddit.com
u/One_Fix5763 — 8 hours ago

What conservative policies would reduce the cost of having and raising children?

I think a lot of people disagree on how to solve the birth rate crisis, if there even is one, whether we should try to solve it, etc. but everyone can agree that having children is more expensive than it should be. What policies would you support which would reduce the cost of having and raising children?

reddit.com
u/Shawnj2 — 4 days ago

How have recent developments around COVID-19's origins shifted or cemented your view — and what specific evidence do you find most persuasive?

Over the past year there have been several significant developments related to the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic:

  • In January 2025, the CIA released a declassified assessment concluding, with low confidence, that a research-related origin is more likely than a natural one.
  • In April 2025, the White House replaced the covid.gov website with a page titled "Lab Leak: The True Origins of Covid-19," laying out the administration's case for a laboratory origin.
  • In April 2026, the Department of Justice indicted Dr. David Morens, a former senior adviser to Dr. Anthony Fauci at NIAID, on charges of concealing federal records related to COVID-19 origins communications.

Below are some of the main lines of scientific evidence cited on each side of the debate, with links so you can verify the underlying claims.

Evidence often cited for a laboratory-related origin:

  • The 2018 DEFUSE proposal — EcoHealth Alliance, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and UNC proposed inserting human-specific furin cleavage sites into bat coronaviruses; DARPA rejected it, but the proposal describes the kind of work that could produce a virus resembling SARS-CoV-2.
  • The unique furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2's spike protein is not found in any known close relatives in nature, and the specific CGG-CGG codon usage is uncommon in natural sarbecoviruses.
  • The October 2021 Tabak letter to Congress acknowledging that NIH-funded work at WIV produced chimeric coronaviruses that replicated more efficiently than wild-type in humanized mice.
  • The released Slack messages between the authors of the influential "Proximal Origin" paper, showing they privately considered a lab leak "highly likely" while publicly dismissing it.
  • The proximity of the outbreak to WIV combined with WIV's biosafety practices — much sarbecovirus research was conducted at BSL-2 rather than higher containment levels.

Evidence often cited for a natural zoonotic origin:

  • The Worobey et al. 2022 paper in Science showing the earliest known COVID-19 cases were geographically centered on the Huanan Seafood Market in Wuhan.
  • The Crits-Christoph et al. 2024 Cell paper genetically tracing wildlife and SARS-CoV-2 at the Huanan market, finding viral RNA co-located with raccoon dog and civet DNA at specific wildlife stalls.
  • The discovery of BANAL viruses in Laos sharing up to 96.8% of their genome with SARS-CoV-2 and infecting human cells via the ACE2 receptor — demonstrating that natural bat coronaviruses with human-cell entry capacity exist in the wild.
  • The Pekar et al. 2022 Science paper arguing for two separate zoonotic introductions (lineages A and B) at the Huanan market, more consistent with natural spillover than a single lab incident.
  • The historical pattern: every documented viral pandemic in recorded history — including SARS in 2003 and MERS in 2012 — has had a natural zoonotic origin, with no documented case of an engineered virus ever causing a pandemic.

My questions for conservatives:

  1. Which specific line(s) of evidence do you find most persuasive? Feel free to cite anything, not just the links I've summarized above.
  2. Has your assessment shifted over the past year as a result of these recent developments, or has it mostly cemented what you already believed?
  3. If you're confident in your view, what kind of evidence — if any — might lead you to revise it?
u/Aggravating-Vehicle9 — 9 hours ago

New poll shows AOC has a strong chance at winning the Democratic Primary for the 2028 Presidential Election. If she does, what are hers chances of winning (based on the current climate)? What would be the best Republican response to an AOC campaign?

u/Kungfudude_75 — 1 day ago

Are there any industries you think should be publicly owned (in some form or another) rather than privately owned? If so, why?

I understand the benefits and drawbacks of free‑market capitalism, but I can’t help wondering whether some industries might function better without a profit incentive. I’m curious how conservatives see this since the right tends to be more opposed to government-run services.

Do you think there are industries that should be publicly run rather than privately owned? If so, why? If you think this would be a bad idea, I’d like to hear why too.

reddit.com
u/breigns2 — 7 hours ago

What will your financial situation look like by years end if gas prices remain elevated (or get worse)?

Nothing more to add from title really. Obviously gas prices being up is bad. Curious what the impact to you will be specifically if they remain this way for the rest of the year.

Edit: To clarify, I'm also assuming inflated prices for goods and services as well. I can't put a number on that of course, but if you can roughly estimate how that would impact you please do.

reddit.com
u/MoonStache — 1 day ago