
Stop Spreading Misinformation
I try to answer questions on this sub occasionally, but oftentimes the top-voted comment is incorrect. Putting the YG/Sparxie doomposting aside, in this thread about using a substat blocker on a 4liner with only 2 good stats, the top response is to NOT use a blocker.
Here's the math, assuming either 4/5 rolls or 5/5 rolls are considered good:
- no blocker: nCr(5,4)*(2/4)^4 * (2/4)^1 + nCr(5,5) * (2/4)^5 = 0.1875
- with blocker: nCr(5,4)*(2/3)^4 * (1/3)^1 + nCr(5,5) * (2/3)^5 = 0.461
unless you're a whale, you likely do not have 6 variable dice you are willing to use without a single blocker. Versus for a 4liner w/ 3 good stats:
- no blocker: 63.3%
- with blocker: 100%
From a numbers standpoint, you therefore save more dice by using blockers on the 2/4 good substats, and naturally rolling the 3/4 good substats (although ideally you would do both, of course). For this piece specifically, since silver wolf only wants SPD, CR, and CD. A 4liner boots with a maxroll base CR is essentially the closest you can get to a godpiece.
I understand that the discourse itself can get annoying, but it's significantly worse when people ask for advice and the top advice that's given is wrong. If you don't know the answer to a question, please don't answer it and potentially misleading others.