*Spoiler Free* Alchemised: Morality, Myths, and Agnosticism (POV of HP and LOTR reader)
Most people associate the word "agnostic" with religion - specifically with someone who neither believes nor disbelieves in God, sitting deliberately in the uncomfortable middle ground between faith and atheism. But in its broader sense, agnosticism simply means refusing to claim certainty about something that cannot be proven either way. It is the "intellectual honesty" of saying - I do not know, and neither do you.
That quiet refusal to arbitrate is exactly what SenLinYu does with the mythology at the heart of Alchemised, and it is one of the most sophisticated things about the book. And it was entirely intentional. In a Grimdark Magazine interview, SenLinYu described the worldbuilding of Alchemised as something they jokingly call "science-fantasy" - because alchemy tradition itself is so deeply rooted in trying to reconcile the religious and the scientific, "filling gaps or inconsistencies with mythology", and deferring to religion when there is a conflict. In a separate Audible interview, SenLinYu cited Mary Beard's book on Rome as a key research influence - specifically the ways that Romans self-mythologized themselves based on their mythic origin, and how that became very definitive of their culture. The central question SenLinYu kept returning to during writing was: in the process of self-mythologizing, what are the things that we erase?
The world of Paladia is built on deep spiritual foundations - sacred orders, ancient legends, prophecy, and faith that people have bled and died for across generations. But from very early in the story, cracks appear in that foundation. The people closest to the mythology are revealed to be managing it rather than simply believing it. And the question of what is genuinely sacred versus what is institutionally convenient is never cleanly resolved. The opposing side offers no better truth either - the regime Helena finds herself imprisoned by is equally built on constructed mythology, personal agenda disguised as cosmic order. Neither the faithful nor the faithless have clean hands when it comes to how belief has been used to organize, control, and sacrifice people.
The most haunting implication sits underneath all of it - that it may not matter either way. The people who sacrificed everything for their beliefs sacrificed just as completely regardless of whether those beliefs were cosmically true. The myth gave them courage, identity, and purpose in an impossible world. Whether it was real was almost beside the point. SenLinYu leaves that question open like a wound - and somehow that open ending is more honest than any answer could have been.
As someone who grew up loving both Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter, I always struggled with how neatly those worlds ask you to accept their mythology - good is good, the magic is real, the prophecy means something. "Logic and morality in those worlds rarely question the myth. They simply serve it."
"What Alchemised gave me that those books never could" is a world where logic, morality, and myth are in constant tension with each other - where nothing is confirmed, "everything is earned in shades of gray, and the agnostic space between belief and doubt is not a weakness but the most honest place any character can stand."
That is why I adore this book so much.