u/inglubridge

Scaling

At 5 employees I was the one who could do everything (sales, operations, customer service, technical work, etc). The clients loved working directly with me, I was the competitive advantage.

At 15 employees I’m the bottleneck, every decision waits for me, every client wants to talk to me, every problem escalates to me, etc. Nothing moves unless I’m involved.

What made me successful at the start is now what’s preventing growth, the things that got you to this point will actively hold you back from the next point.

Being involved in everything worked when there were 10 things, but it breaks when there are 100 things.

Knowing every client personally was great when you had 8 clients, but it’s impossible at 40 clients.

Making every decision yourself was fine when there were 3 decisions per day, but it’s a disaster at 20 decisions per day.

The transition I’m struggling with right now is learning to trust other people to do things I know I could do better myself.

Because even if they do it 80% as well as I would, that’s fine, 80% quality on 10 things is better than 100% quality on 3 things because I’m the bottleneck on everything else.

I’m documenting how I do things with Soperate so other people can handle them, teaching people to make decisions without me, letting clients work with account managers instead of always escalating to the founder, etc.

But it feels wrong, like I’m lowering standards or abandoning what made us successful.

But the alternative is staying at 15 employees forever because I can’t let go of being the person who does everything.

Did anyone else struggle with this transition?

reddit.com
u/inglubridge — 12 hours ago

I tracked the hours I worked for a month

I started time tracking last month to figure out where my day actually and I thought I was being productive, but i was wrong.

So I logged 160 hours of work, which were divided into these tasks:

- 52 hours in meetings that could have been emails, that's a third of my entire month sitting in rooms where my attendance didn't matter.

- 31 hours answering the same 8 questions I've already answered before. Questions like "How do we do this", "What's the process for that", "Who approves this thing", the same questions from different people every week.

- 18 hours switching between tasks because I kept getting interrupted. So I started something, then get pulled into a conversation, then try to remember where I was, all the time.

- 23 hours on actual strategic work, the stuff I'm actually supposed to be doing as the founder. Less than 15% of my time.

The rest was admin, emails, putting out fires, and pretending to work while being completely mentally exhausted.

I'm paying myself a salary to attend meetings nobody needs me in and answer questions that should be documented somewhere.

What i changed was rejecting meeting invites unless I'm critical to the decision, cutting my meeting time by 60% in two weeks.

The documented the 8 questions I answer repeatedly, now I send links instead of explaining the same thing for the 100th time.

Also blocked 3 hour chunks with no interruptions, because mornings are for actual work, afternoons are for coordination and fires.

After tracking time again this week, it was 41 hours of strategic work, which is still not perfect but way better than 23.

Most founders think they're busy being productive, but we're actually busy being available for things that don't need us.

I recommend you tracking your time for one week, you'll hate what you learn but at least you'll know what to fix.

Anyone else tried this?

reddit.com
u/inglubridge — 14 hours ago

This is why my clients ghosted me mid-project

In my experience clients don’t ghost because your work is bad, but because they don’t know what’s happening.

I learned this the expensive way after losing 3 clients in 2 months. All of them just stopped responding, they wouldn’t answer emails or take calls and projects died halfway through.

I thought maybe the work wasn’t good enough or they found someone cheaper or I did something to piss them off, but after I talked to one of them months later at a networking thing and asked what happened, she said she just felt confused about where the project was and didn’t want to seem dumb by asking basic questions, so she just stopped engaging.

So the problem wasn’t the work itself, but that I wasn’t communicating the process clearly enough, so she didn’t know what was happening next, when to expect deliverables, what she needed to provide, or whether things were on track.

So she assumed the worst and bailed.

Now I send a simple 3 line email after every client interaction:

∙	What we just finished

∙	What’s happening next

∙	What I need from you and when

And that’s it, it literally takes 2 minutes, then client ghosting dropped to basically zero. They might not love every deliverable but they at least know what’s happening and when to expect things.

The other thing that helped was documenting our process so I could send clients a simple overview at project start. Here’s what happens week 1, week 2, week 3, here’s when you’ll see drafts, here’s when we need feedback, etc.

I use Soperate for internal stuff but honestly you could do this in a Google Doc. The tool doesn’t matter, but the clarity does.

So, resumed, clients ghost when they’re confused.

Keep them informed and they’ll stay engaged even when things aren’t perfect.

Did this also happen to you?

reddit.com
u/inglubridge — 4 days ago

Your clients can tell when your team doesn’t follow consistent processes

So it’s been three months into running my small agency and I’m learning painful lessons about consistency.

I had 2 different account managers handle the same type of client request last week, with completely different approaches, different timelines, different communication styles, etc. 1 followed up proactively, the other waited for the client to chase.

The client who got the proactive service was happy, while the one who had to chase multiple times is now questioning whether we’re the right agency for them.

Both account managers are good at what they do, but the problem is we don’t have documented processes for how we handle common client situations, so everyone just does what feels right to them in the moment.

I realized clients notice these inconsistencies even when we don’t. It makes us look disorganized and unprofessional, which is the last thing you want when you’re trying to build trust.

I started documenting our client processes with Soperate so everyone follows the same approach. Things like client onboarding steps, how we handle feedback, escalation procedures, monthly reporting workflow. It takes maybe 5 minutes to document each process.

The new account manager we just hired can actually reference the documented workflows instead of making it up as they go or constantly asking me how to handle things.

It’s only the early days but clients have definitely noticed the difference. Consistency builds trust way faster than individual heroics.

reddit.com
u/inglubridge — 5 days ago