
Proof that c.ai is adding so many features and paywalling features that are free on alternatives purely for money.
C.ai alternatives such as spicychat, and janitor.ai are much smaller than c.ai themselves, yet, they can add these free features that c.ai paywalls, such as the lorebook feature. and, i get the classic argument of "theyre a big company with more servers which means they need more money." but alternatives like the previously mentioned have userbases of 600k+ users (telling by the chat numbers some bots have), and yet they can afford it without having to paywall a majority of their features.
and the fact that c.ai is a big company makes it even more unjustifiable to a certain extent, due to the very fact they have more users. okay, ads, alright, chase the bag, man, but then they paywall everything, even though they do probably have enough profit to pay for almost everything on a monthly basis, since 1/50 c.ai users on average probably have c.ai+, which means theres about 600k paying users, which is a profit of about 6 million every time the fee comes up, even if the number is lower than my approximaton (1/50) even if we lower it to 1/100, its still roughly 2.5 million every month, or about 28 million a year. add that up with the ads and other stuff, and you get why it isnt exactly justifiable.
and even without this annoying numbers game im playing to prove my point, saying that a big company costs more to maintain so stuff like paywalling is justified is mildly paradoxical, because: big company = more costs to maintain, BUT ALSO, big company = more profits bc its a big company. it sort of balances itself out.
TL;DR: Caatae