According to a new report from 404 Media, Iran is successfully using AI-generated propaganda, including viral LEGO animations and catchy rap songs, to target American audiences and critique US leadership. Meanwhile, the US administration's attempts at counter-propaganda using video game memes are largely falling flat outside of its core base.
This is a horror series made using script by ChatGPT + Cinema Studio 3.0 for image and image to video ,original series , in this we have blur some scenes so everyone can watch it :)
‘We have a few times in our history realized something really important is working, or about to work so well, that we have to stop a bunch of other projects. In fact, this was the original thing that happened with GPT3. We had a whole portfolio of bets at the time. A lot of them were working well. We shut down many projects that were working well, like robotics which we mentioned, so that we could concentrate our compute, our researchers, our effort into this thing that we said "okay there's a very important thing happening." I did not expect 3 or 6 months ago to be at this point we're at now; where something very big and important is about to happen again with this next generation of models and the agents they can power.'
He goes on to imply there may be a possible future relationship with Disney, then finishes up with:
'we need to concentrate our compute and our product capacity into these next generation of automated researchers and companies.'
Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas recently stated that AI-driven job displacement isn't necessarily a bad thing because most people don't enjoy their jobs. Speaking on the All-In podcast, he argued that losing traditional employment to AI will free individuals to pursue entrepreneurship and start their own mini-businesses.
You can read about it here: rdi.berkeley.edu/blog/peer-preservation/
‘We have a few times in our history realized something really important is working, or about to work so well, that we have to stop a bunch of other projects. In fact, this was the original thing that happened with GPT3. We had a whole portfolio of bets at the time. A lot of them were working well. We shut down many projects that were working well, like robotics which we mentioned, so that we could concentrate our compute, our researchers, our effort into this thing that we said "okay there's a very important thing happening." I did not expect 3 or 6 months ago to be at this point we're at now; where something very big and important is about to happen again with this next generation of models and the agents they can power.'
He goes on to imply there may be a possible future relationship with Disney, then finishes up with:
'we need to concentrate our compute and our product capacity into these next generation of automated researchers and companies.'
It’s trendy to hate on Altman but I think he got into all of this with the right intentions.
You can read about it here: rdi.berkeley.edu/blog/peer-preservation/
I've been doing some science experiments as well as finance research and have been asking the same question to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Venice and Grok. Going forward I kind of want the ease of mind knowing the one I end up using will be most accurate, atleast for my needs (general question asking regarding finance (companies) and science, not any coding or image related).
ChatGPT does the best at summarizing and giving a consensus outline with interesting follow up questions. It's edge in follow up questions that are pertinent will likely have me always using it.
Grok has been best at citing exactly what I need from research papers. I was surprised as I had the lowest expectations for it, but it also provides the link to the publications.
Claude is very good at details and specifics (that are accurate) but doesn't publicly cite sources. Still I come closest to conclusions with Claude because of the accuracy of the info.
Venice provides a ton of relevant info, but it doesn't narrow it down to an accurate conclusion, atleast scientifically, the way Claude does. When I was looking for temperature ranges for bacterial growth, it provided boundaries instead of tightly defined numbers.
Perplexity is very similar to venice.
--
I'm curious to those who have spent time on the chatbots --- what pros and cons do you like about each?
A deeply tragic and concerning report from The Guardian highlights a critical failure in AI safety guardrails. According to a recent inquest, a teenager who tragically took their own life had previously used ChatGPT to search for the "most successful ways" to do so.
To be clear, I saw it go over my budget earlier than that point but wanted to see what would happen if I just kept using it. Surely it'd stop me, right? That's the point of a budget, afterall.
It wasn't until the amount you see there that it finally put the breaks on, and I got a message saying I couldn't generate another request for something like 1.4083408343084e42 weeks.
Guys, honest answers needed. Are we heading toward Agent to Agent protocols and the world where agents hire another agents, or just bigger Super-Agents?
I'm working on a protocol for Agent-to-Agent interaction: long-running tasks, recurring transactions, external validation.
But it makes me wonder: Do we actually want specialized agents negotiating with each other? Or do we just want one massive LLM agent that "does everything" to avoid the complexity of multi-agent coordination?
Please give me you thoughts:)
So I got tired of hitting the daily limit on Cloud AI way too fast. The limit per account feels pretty low, especially if you use it a lot. As a workaround, I started cloning the app and using multiple instances. Now, whenever one reaches the limit, I just switch to another. Currently running about 6 cloned versions 😅 Honestly, it’s been a game changer for me.
Are you guys doing something similar?
Or do you have a better workaround? Let’s share ideas 👇
A small experiment with a computer use agent called gloamy on gpt-4.1
The setup lets it actually interact with a device , sees the screen, decides what to do, taps or types, keeps going until the task is done. Simple cross-device task, nothing complex. The whole point was just to see if it could follow through consistently.