u/dreamsofcalamity

IMHO tak - żeby osoby zbierające butelki (czy puszki) mogły to robić bezpiecznie i higienicznie.

Nie wszyscy konsumenci oddają butelki do butelkomatów albo do koszów do segregacji. Ktoś kupi colę po drodze z pracy i wyrzuci butelkę do śmietnika, a tak mógłby odłożyć do pfandringu (nie wiem, jak to przetłumaczyć).

Let's talk about life that is already born, that is already existing and suffering, that is not potential.

Unlike in Middle Ages when an attempt to suicide could be met with an execution (sic) or confiscation of property or denial of Christian burial, in modern times suicide is not legally punished in the most of the world. But it is also not supported.

Still people who want to meet their end risk lifetime injuries and disabilities that will make their life even worse. Not to mention difficulties and unnecessary pain.

This is not a promortalist thread. I am simply asking: do antinatalists believe people should be able to end their life and should they receive help in ending it safely so that no further harm is added to their suffering?

Should for example a person in mild/severe/without any depression be able to receive euthanasia? Under what conditions if any? Euthanasia means "good death". Euthanasia is painless and it is safe. Painless and safe are two important keywords here.

Do you know of Noelia Castillo!? Do you think it is right or not that her request for euthanasia has been granted?