Has anyone done a detailed comparison of the difference between AI chatbots
I've been doing some science experiments as well as finance research and have been asking the same question to ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Venice and Grok. Going forward I kind of want the ease of mind knowing the one I end up using will be most accurate, atleast for my needs (general question asking regarding finance (companies) and science, not any coding or image related).
ChatGPT does the best at summarizing and giving a consensus outline with interesting follow up questions. It's edge in follow up questions that are pertinent will likely have me always using it.
Grok has been best at citing exactly what I need from research papers. I was surprised as I had the lowest expectations for it, but it also provides the link to the publications.
Claude is very good at details and specifics (that are accurate) but doesn't publicly cite sources. Still I come closest to conclusions with Claude because of the accuracy of the info.
Venice provides a ton of relevant info, but it doesn't narrow it down to an accurate conclusion, atleast scientifically, the way Claude does. When I was looking for temperature ranges for bacterial growth, it provided boundaries instead of tightly defined numbers.
Perplexity is very similar to venice.
--
I'm curious to those who have spent time on the chatbots --- what pros and cons do you like about each?