b*yazligin var olan her kotulugun kaynagi olmasi
yasadigim toprak parcasi uzerinden ornek vermem gerekirse turk milliyetcileri ten rengi uzerinden etnisitesi hakkinda hicbir bilgi sahibi olmadigi herkesi kurt, arap, cingene vb. bir azinliga yamamaya calisip hicbir alakasi olmayan kisileri turk kabul ettirebilmek icin 40 dereden su getirirken ayni fakat tam tersi bir sekilde (kendisi turk olsun olmasin) turklere karsi olan cogu kisi de temellendirmelerinde ayni b*yaz ovucu retorikleri (benim tenim b*yaz, ben sizdenim, turkler beyaz degil vs.) kullaniyor. yani milliyetcilik bu topraklarda ister turk lehine ister aleyhine olsun hep bu dogrultuda gerceklesiyor.
ben buna karsi sag kanattan hicbir hareket gormedigim gibi garip bir sekilde sol kanat da bu bariz fenomene tamamen sagir.
bu cok garip cunku b*yazlik tamamen kapitalizm ve emperyalizm ile paralel gelismis ve ona butunlesmis bir olgu. bugun b*yazlarin lehine yapacaginiz her soylem bir kapitalizm / sermaye ovuculugu icermek zorunda. ayni sekilde b*yaz olmayanlara yapilan her irkcilik da cevabini kapitalizm karsiti / sol literaturden aliyor.
bu baglamda turkiye veya turkiyede milliyetcilik icin yapilan analizleri ben yanlis veya eksik buluyorum. goz ardi edilen cok muhim bir sey varsa o da turkiyenin a*merika veya a*rupa gibi b*yaz veya b*yaz ovucu bir yapi olmasinin yaninda onlardan farkli olarak somurge veya yari-somurge olmasi.
konuyla alakali:
https://www.reddit.com/r/communism101/comments/rtiqmo/comment/hqtpww2/
>Basically whiteness is a pan-European project designed to supplant former European antipathies (e.g., Catholic v non-Catholic) to create alliances for the formation of capitalism as a whole. Overall, whiteness was a primary precursor to the growth of capitalism, because it allowed European powers to create alliances in lieu of previously held animosities.
>Since the formation of whiteness, bourgeois powers have been able to undermine solidarity movements because those who can identify themselves as “white” (which, while informed by phenotype can be given and taken away as seen in the recent addition of Italians as “white” within the previous century) can receive specific benefits from capitalistic empires at the expense of indigenous communities
>As Sakai points out, the bourgeois have historically used white unions to destroy Black, Mexican, indigenous and Asian communities and workers’ rights. Hence why, in my opinion, an important formation of work should be focusing on the illegitimacy of the US state in its entirety, and why concessions are short term wins for the long term goals of liberation and abolition.
>But this also means that white workers should center indigenous voices and leadership and any notions of “patriotic socialism” are poisonous because this is a continuation of whiteness as a political project, which will always undermine movements. To combat whiteness, white workers and comrades should regularly interrogate their placement, take on more work to offset the historical pressure placed on communities of color, and actively take physical and vocal stances.