![How the Federal Reserve's New Chairman Plans to Restructure the US Monetary System [9:34]](https://external-preview.redd.it/K2D4dljMBx4xUqG4k-i3qDVrlDkx_B2loKJ_-1ay-jM.jpeg?width=140&height=105&auto=webp&s=dfb06fdc7a94f713e2747ecf30eaf5460ac451ce)
u/Thick_Ship_9762
![How the Federal Reserve's New Chairman Plans to Restructure the US Monetary System [9:34]](https://external-preview.redd.it/K2D4dljMBx4xUqG4k-i3qDVrlDkx_B2loKJ_-1ay-jM.jpeg?width=140&height=105&auto=webp&s=dfb06fdc7a94f713e2747ecf30eaf5460ac451ce)
The new Fed chairman's allies published something the same day he was confirmed and I haven't seen a single outlet actually explain what's in it
I pay attention to this stuff more than most people I know Not a finance professional just someone who got deep into monetary policy after 2008 and couldn't really look away after that
Warsh gets confirmed May 6th Everyone covers the usual angles his Goldman background his history at the Fed during the crisis what it means for rates.
And then buried in the same day's announcements is language about programmable digital currency that I had to read twice just to make sure I wasn't misreading it.
The BIS has published peer reviewed papers laying out exactly what programmable money enables by design. Expiry conditions. Category restrictions. Negative nominal rates that reduce your savings without your balance visibly changing. These aren't proposals. They're published specifications.
The part that actually got me wasn't the technology. It was the timing. You don't hand someone that toolkit the same week you confirm them unless the plan is already written.
Most people think digital dollar means faster Venmo. The structural difference between money you legally own and money you're granted access to is not a subtle distinction. It changes what savings means. It changes what financial freedom means.
Bretton Woods didn't ask the world either. Just made it the new reality.
Curious if anyone here has been tracking the Warsh confirmation through this lens or if this is still mostly flying under the radar.
They're Hiding $1 Quadrillion in Debt Inside Every Bank And It's About to Explode
youtu.beI tested myself for a week. No phone for the first 30 minutes after waking up. Here's what actually happened.
I'd read about this habit probably a dozen times. Always thought it sounded like something people do to feel productive without actually being productive.
Tried it anyway because I was waking up exhausted no matter how much I slept.
First two days were genuinely uncomfortable. I'd reach for my phone without even thinking, like a reflex. Didn't realize how automatic it was until I was actively stopping myself.
By day four something shifted. I started noticing I was getting through the first hour of my day without that low grade anxiety I'd normalized so much I forgot it wasn't supposed to be there.
I'm not going to tell you it changed my life. But I will say the version of me that existed before checking anything felt noticeably different from the one that woke up and immediately loaded the world's problems into his head.
Still do it most mornings. Not all. But most.
I've been going to the same diner for two years and today I realized I never actually looked up from my phone once
I work from home so most days the only reason I leave the apartment is to grab lunch somewhere. There's this small diner maybe a 4 minute walk from me. I've been going there probably 3 or 4 times a week for almost two years now.
Today I forgot my phone charger and my battery died before I even ordered. So I just sat there. Nothing to scroll, nothing to check.
And I actually looked around for the first time. There's a older couple that apparently sits at the same corner table every single day. The guy who works the register has a picture of what I'm assuming is his daughter taped next to the cash drawer. The ceiling has these old wooden beams that I genuinely never noticed.
Two years. Hundreds of visits. I knew the menu by heart but I didn't know any of this.
I don't think I'm unique in this. I think a lot of us are physically somewhere but not actually there at all. The phone just makes it easy to never fully arrive anywhere.
Anyway. Charged my phone when I got home and immediately opened Reddit. So clearly I didn't learn that much.
In his 2002 annual letter to shareholders, Warren Buffett described derivatives as "financial weapons of mass destruction", not speculation, his exact words in a publicly available Berkshire Hathaway filing.
The 2008 crisis validated part of that concern. The BIS (Bank for International Settlements) documented the role of unhedged derivative exposure in the credit freeze. Their quarterly reviews are still public.
What's less discussed is what happened after: according to BIS data, the notional derivatives market has grown substantially since 2008, now sitting north of $600 trillion by conservative estimates.
Three structural conditions that BIS researchers have flagged in recent publications:
— Interest rate derivative exposure concentrated in a small number of counterparties . Liquidity assumptions that break down during correlated stress events . Central bank balance sheets that entered this decade already expanded from prior interventions
The Hormuz closure adds an energy price variable on top of a system that wasn't stress-tested for simultaneous rate and commodity shocks.
Not predicting collapse. Asking whether the post-2008 regulatory framework actually addressed the structural concentration . or just moved it.
Sources in comments.