Standard vs Performance, One Pedal or Not
I know these have been discussed but I couldn't find it.
I paid for ultra, twin motor performance because I wanted to pull a utility trailer. The EX90 replaced a pickup truck. I don't pull it often, but when I do, I don't want to get stuck in wet grass, like my pickup would do pulling the trailer around the yard. I was also aware the front and rear tires are different sizes, so no rotating to take care of the tires. And the tires are expensive.
I feel, traction for acceleration and braking is best distributed to four surfaces rather than two. This may extend the wear on the tires and would certainly be less stress on two motor/generators than one. I see no difference viewing instant consumption when I switch back and forth between standard and performance. One pedal when stopping is surely less wear on two motors and four tires than on one motor two tires. A number hard to pinpoint is regen, it kind of seems I get more regen in performance than standard.
I have nothing to go on but gut. Hopefully, someone with more technical knowledge can weigh in with statistics. When I owned a 442, that big block practically idled through the gears. To me, two motors propelling forward at less strain is better than having one motor do all the work. But then I am using more kWh to run two motors, but only at half the work.
When using standard, am I front wheel or rear wheel drive? When in performance, is cornering tire wear increased? Is there limited slip between the two front and two rear tires?