Study on Natural Progression by Ultrasound Result
I am trying to understand what the natural progression of this disease is for my case (young, no penile fracture, 2 plaques, related disease, family genetics, ...).
I found this study interesting as it provides an estimate on how the disease develops naturally depending on ultrasound result.
The study is especially nice as they exclude penile fractures—so it is more relevant to the "genetic, started out of nowhere" variant which I believe is different to scarring after penile fracture.
What I found super interesting is that when there is no shadow (no calcification?) there is a high chance of natural improvement over the follow up period?!?
Thinking about this and traction and other therapies it is super difficult to design studies and to rely on anecdotal result of therapies. I mean they would need to drastically classify patients to find similar cohorts.
Also this would allow shady studies to put more single lesion people in the group of their treatment and they will see a X% better outcome for them.
What I understand is that based on the study if you have a lesion without any shadow then there is a higher chance of it improving. If you have a hard calcified plaque then there is almost none. So I think this is something I will discuss with my uro as he avoids ultrasound (he says it makes no difference in treatment) and the ultrasound would be helpful for me to decide between an actual wait and see or conservative traction therapy treatment vs. surgery.