Sooo, apparently they found the male g-spot... and of course it's the part that gets removed during a circumcision...
So yeah, I just watched a video by MoistCritical and just found out that apparently the frenulum is the "primary erogenous zone" of the penis... which just happens to be the part that gets removed during circumcision... I've been looking into it and apparently it makes bigdickproblems bigger. A lot of the problems I've seen on here like vaginismus and tearing appear to be significantly worsened by circumcision.
For one, the glans penis and clitoral glans are directly equivalent and develop from the exact same tissue. The foreskin and the clitoral hood are also both the same structure. Apparently circumcision is functionally equivalent to removing the entire clitoral hood AND the frenulum underneath it.
Not only that, but removing the foreskin also causes the glans to dry out and become rough, hard, and less sensitive. This is directly equivalent to the clitoris becoming rough, hard, and less sensitive with the exception that the clitoris has more nerves and therefore, males already have less sensitivity to work with.
Furthermore, the foreskin allows the penis to glide in a skin like sheath during sex. This means little, if any, lubrication is needed and greatly reduces vaginismus and microtears. A circumcised penis can't move within that skin sheath and has to slide directly against the vagina like a piston. This, especially with large penises, means a loooot more friction. The foreskin also apparently helps keep lubricating fluids inside the vagina during sex, like an o-ring, while a cut penis actually tends to push fluids out. (Not great for your engine when your piston's o-rings fail. That's how you end up with a seized engine)
Also... a big, hard, rough glans seems like it would be less pleasurable to a woman and causes more friction than a soft, smooth, and internally lubricated one.
I don't know about you, but my parents intentionally circumsised me to reduce sexual function and sensitivity, and now I'm learning it's literally a DIRECT PHYSIOLOGICAL EQUIVALENT to a clitoral hood reduction. And remember, the keratinization of the head of yo dick is just like a woman's clitoris becoming hard, rough, and insensitive. The only difference is the glans has 4,000 nerves to work with compared to the clitoris's 8,000 nerves...
Anyways, I'm just kinda rambling because I just found out about this and I'm kinda fucking pissed to be honest. My parents had that done to me with the explicit intent to reduce sexual function and pleasure, and they got their wish because I've never been sensitive enough down there to make me very interested in sex. Lol
You chop yo babies dick up and then complain when he hasn't gotten married and had kids... SMDH😮💨
Anyways, sorry for rambling. I don't know how this post will be received, but I just had to vent a little I guess... I also wanted to share because it just amplifies bigdickproblems...