Why aren't most atheists convinced by antinatalism?
What if those children suffer horribly due to any random evil or bad thing that can happen?
In the warped world of religious people, God will hopefully make everything right either in this life or in the next one. In that world, there is an afterlife where everything will be fine and where God will be able to maybe cancel everything bad that happened to innocent people that suffered horribly. This gives religious people so many answers they can give their children if something horrible happens to them.
I am of course aware that in both sides no one really thinks about anything and just goes with the flow of life and their biological impulses. I am sad and finding no trace of the critical thinking that is supposed to be present here.
What answers can an atheist give to his child if he has cancer and suffers horribly ? What if he has an accident and becomes paralyzed ? What if he goes through horrible traumatic events ?
Why would they condemn innocent beings to certain death in a world that provides no answers to all the evil that is done in it ? Why would they want, knowingly, to expose their child to the fear of death and the unkown?
Why would they expose innocent beings to unnecessary risks and guaranteed suffering and death ? They are not the ones who will pay the price of all the dangers that their children can encounter.
I will now try to pre-shot a few possible counter arguments I've seen given by atheists in the past :
\- I consider that life is worth living and I will take good care of my child no matter what.
\-> This is in no way in the interest of the child and does not account for catastrophic events that can happen to him. I of course do not disagree that it is in the interest of the parent to have children. What should matter is the life of the child who could have been spared unnecessary suffering.
\- If the child is not satisfied with his life he can easily exit it.
\-> This is of course not true. Once you are born, the harm is already done and generally everyone will have a biological drive and impulse to to hold on to life no matter the degree of their suffering.
Even for someone who wants to do it, it is extremely hard to do so because it can be very scary, it could fail and leave him in a state worth than death, it will hurt the people he loves and he may choose to continue with life just to avoid traumatizing his loved ones.
\- Why watch a movie if you know that is going to end?
\-> When you make decisions for yourself it is completely fine because you are the only one that will bear the consequences. Making a decision on behalf of someone else who will then face the consequences is not normal.
\- Being a nihilist and knowing that life has no meaning or purpose shouldn't prevent you from leaving it fully and sharing it with people you love before your death.
\-> Of course. The problem is bringing new people in this hell that we're living in. Please don't fall in the trap of justifying evil actions. Be happy and share this life with your loved ones. If you truly want children no matter what, please adopt and save innocent beings that have been thrown in this meat grinder and abandoned by life.
Adoption is completely different from having your own biological children? You really want your own biological children no matter what? This is absolutely not for the sake of the child.