u/ManipulativFox

Any suggestions for heat in dhamma divakara center, mehsana?

Any suggestions for heat in dhamma divakara center, mehsana?

I am going to dhamma divakara centre , mehsana, India which is near tropic of cancer and temperature is high.

So if you have been to this center in summer. Any advice/tips what I should carry to help in heat. Is there AC in hall as in Google maps it does not have AC in hall pictures.

Metta.

u/ManipulativFox — 3 days ago

Gujarat Model in Assam - 10 years output. Also income distribution is more among common people compared to socialist parties

Gdp grew fast (not fastest) among all states in india in last decade despite covid pandemic. Also per capita distribution is best compared to socialist states like kerela or tamil nadu. So instead of few people getting benefits of gdp growth like politicians and their close people. More people got benefit for infrastructure like bridges , roads,etc. Also after 10 years Tamil nadu has gdp growth but it has increased growth with debt more due to freebies reliance and less job creation. So this is how gujarat model is applied in bjp ruled states if state leadership is capable. Job creation, investments, law and order and transparency.

u/ManipulativFox — 5 days ago
▲ 2 r/GenZ

https://preview.redd.it/kb0vg72uliyg1.png?width=1454&format=png&auto=webp&s=da398614e70bf486d05bf73e6d5d473c8a965674

its just my radical opinion. if everyone follows "net" 1 child policy then in 4 generations population will decline so much that lot of land occupied for agriculture will be back to forest cover. we will have enough housing for everyone as most will stay in already built homes and newer homes can be built cheaply because less money would be required in economy due to less demand and economic activity. everyone will get access to good basic necessity like food,water,housing so people could follow their passion or work in some company or nature/tourism/leisure...
automation and ai could work in place of humans as japan is trying to do. if everyone is choosing their passion and less unemployment issue then we can progress so much in all sectors when people are happy doing what they want.
this is my opinion

reddit.com
u/ManipulativFox — 14 days ago

We often see AI layoffs and climate change discussed as separate crises. I drew this diagram to visualize an idea I have: that they are intrinsically linked by population scale. I am seeking feedback on the viability of this model before I try to build an NGO around it.

The premise:

Current inflation and resource scarcity are driven by current population demand. AI is about to remove massive numbers of people from the economic engine (unemployment). These two trends seem incompatible.

The diagram visualizes a synchronized approach:

Generation 1 is the starting point (top row), with current levels of automation and high population pressure on a limited environment.

The solution (over Generations 2 and 3) is a synchronized dual action: A conscious shift to smaller family units (the human column showing consolidation down to single children). This natural decrease in population is paired with an aggressive expansion of AI (the robot column).

The outcome (Gen 3): A small, stable population has all its needs (housing, necessities) met because advanced AI produces the necessary value, while the reduced consumption allows nature to thrive. This resolves income inequality (needs are met) and climate change (consumption is down).

This looks clean on a diagram. My questions are:

  1. Which column fails first and why?
  2. Critics of population reduction often point to a collapsing economy or "demographic timebomb." Does the expansion of AI in Column 1 invalidate that specific risk, or just mask it?
  3. Assume the transition to small families is voluntary and proactive. Is there a scenario where this logic still fails?

Thank you for any genuine critical thought you can provide on this logic.
i used ai to draft this post image i could not add so adding in comment

reddit.com
u/ManipulativFox — 14 days ago

Could the solution to the unemployment,Inflation, income inequality and the climate emergency be found in a multi-generational population shift?

I am looking for genuine validation from this community. What if the primary obstacles facing humanity are not individual issues, but rather symptoms of a fundamental system mismatch? I created this diagram to test a specific concept: can we consciously use population management as the master lever to achieve stability?

The Roadmap Explained:

I have structured this over three generations (approximately 75 years).

The Human Column: The core mechanism is a transition to smaller families, perhaps a sustainable 1-child-per-person model. The image shows how pairs in Generation 1 consolidate into single children in Generation 2, leading to a much smaller total population apex in Generation 3. This is done through voluntary, proactive choice.

The Environmental Column: As the human headcount declines naturally, the stress on resources and pollution decreases. This is visualized by the trees and environment thriving. We allow nature to recover because our pressure is lighter.

The Automation Column: This column is essential. We don't just reduce population; we proactively increase the role of Automation and robotics. The image shows the automated workforce expanding over generations to do the heavy lifting of the economy. This allows for housing, clean energy, and basic necessities to be met globally for the much smaller, stable population in Generation 3.

I want to avoid abstract arguments and focus on the mechanics and mathematics.

  1. Is the logic sound? If we successfully stabilize the population through generations (Column 2), can AI (Column 1) logically produce a surplus large enough to guarantee standard of living for that smaller population while allowing nature to heal (Column 3)?
  2. What is the critical failure point in this roadmap? Assume global adoption of the family planning model is achieved. What is the secondary failure?

This idea feels visionary but I am aware of how massive the implementation challenges are. Before trying to pursue this, I need critical feedback on the systemic logic. i think current growth metrics of gdp is not sustainable for long. instead of encouraging people to have more children i think it would be better if we settle for little less wealth but its value will be more like in past and we get good environment and planet in process.

reddit.com
u/ManipulativFox — 14 days ago

So we went again to buy organic kesar mango after buying 1 box last week. Few mangos were spoiled in purchase so we told them about that so owner uncle said they will add few mangos extra in new box. Such a small act of kindness no doubt he had largest mango stall in that Festival event among all.

Location is before gurukul metro station, thaltej.

I thought many people find it difficult to get mangos without carbide in city. We had faced the issue and not bought mangos for few years but now this location hopefully they will continue to come every year.

Also extra information - gujarat government had passed 3 farms laws based on central farms laws and they are still applicable in gujarat so lot of these farmers are directly selling to customers like us and which gives cheaper price for end users and more income for farmers.

There is organic market in sola bhagwat and b r ambedkar open university on Sunday morning.

u/ManipulativFox — 16 days ago